Literature DB >> 28799868

Timing of cranioplasty: a 10.75-year single-center analysis of 754 patients.

Ryan P Morton1, Isaac Josh Abecassis1, Josiah F Hanson1, Jason K Barber1, Mimi Chen1, Cory M Kelly1, John D Nerva1, Samuel N Emerson1, Chibawanye I Ene1, Michael R Levitt1,2, Michelle M Chowdhary1, Andrew L Ko1, Randall M Chesnut1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Despite their technical simplicity, cranioplasty procedures carry high reported morbidity rates. The authors here present the largest study to date on complications after cranioplasty, focusing specifically on the relationship between complications and timing of the operation. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed all cranioplasty cases performed at Harborview Medical Center over the past 10.75 years. In addition to relevant clinical and demographic characteristics, patient morbidity and mortality data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to analyze variables potentially associated with the risk of infection, hydrocephalus, seizure, hematoma, and bone flap resorption. RESULTS Over the course of 10.75 years, 754 cranioplasties were performed at a single institution. Sixty percent of the patients who underwent these cranioplasties were male, and the median follow-up overall was 233 days. The 30-day mortality rate was 0.26% (2 cases, both due to postoperative epidural hematoma). Overall, 24.6% percent of the patients experienced at least 1 complication including infection necessitating explantation of the flap (6.6%), postoperative hydrocephalus requiring a shunt (9.0%), resorption of the flap requiring synthetic cranioplasty (6.3%), seizure (4.1%), postoperative hematoma requiring evacuation (2.3%), and other (1.6%). The rate of infection was significantly higher if the cranioplasty had been performed < 14 days after the initial craniectomy (p = 0.007, Holm-Bonferroni-adjusted p = 0.028). Hydrocephalus was significantly correlated with time to cranioplasty (OR 0.92 per 10-day increase, p < 0.001) and was most common in patients whose cranioplasty had been performed < 90 days after initial craniectomy. New-onset seizure, however, only occurred in patients who had undergone their cranioplasty > 90 days after initial craniectomy. Bone flap resorption was the least likely complication for patients whose cranioplasty had been performed between 15 and 30 days after initial craniectomy. Resorption was also correlated with patient age, with a hazard ratio of 0.67 per increase of 10 years of age (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Cranioplasty performed between 15 and 30 days after initial craniectomy may minimize infection, seizure, and bone flap resorption, whereas waiting > 90 days may minimize hydrocephalus but may increase the risk of seizure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IPH = intraparenchymal hemorrhage; MCA = middle cerebral artery; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; TBI = traumatic brain injury; complication; cranioplasty; infection; resorption; timing; traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28799868     DOI: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  21 in total

1.  Cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: minor surgical complexity but still high periprocedural complication rates.

Authors:  Ehab Shiban; Nicole Lange; Antonia Hauser; Ann-Kathrin Jörger; Arthur Wagner; Bernhard Meyer; Jens Lehmberg
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Surface Area of Decompressive Craniectomy Predicts Bone Flap Failure after Autologous Cranioplasty: A Radiographic Cohort Study.

Authors:  W Chase Johnson; Vijay M Ravindra; Tristan Fielder; Mariam Ishaque; T Tyler Patterson; Michael J McGinity; John V Lacci; Ramesh Grandhi
Journal:  Neurotrauma Rep       Date:  2021-08-27

Review 3.  The Materials Utilized in Cranial Reconstruction: Past, Current, and Future.

Authors:  Haley Meyer; Syed I Khalid; Amir H Dorafshar; Richard W Byrne
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 0.558

4.  A case series of early and late cranioplasty-comparison of surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Anna Bjornson; Tamara Tajsic; Angelos G Kolias; Adam Wells; Mohammad J Naushahi; Fahim Anwar; Adel Helmy; Ivan Timofeev; Peter J Hutchinson
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Postoperative complications influencing the long-term outcome of head-injured patients after decompressive craniectomy.

Authors:  Guangfu Di; Yuhai Zhang; Hua Liu; Xiaochun Jiang; Yong Liu; Kun Yang; Jiu Chen; Hongyi Liu
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 6.  Can early cranioplasty reduce the incidence of hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Davide Nasi; Mauro Dobran
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-05-02

7.  Effect of cranioplasty timing on the functional neurological outcome and postoperative complications.

Authors:  Ahmed Aloraidi; Ali Alkhaibary; Ahoud Alharbi; Nada Alnefaie; Abeer Alaglan; Abdulaziz AlQarni; Turki Elarjani; Ala Arab; Jamal M Abdullah; Abdulaziz Oqalaa Almubarak; Munzir Abbas; Ibtesam Khairy; Wedad H Almadani; Mohammed Alowhaibi; Abdulaziz Alarifi; Sami Khairy; Ahmed Alkhani
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-06-07

8.  Timing for cranioplasty to improve neurological outcome: A systematic review.

Authors:  Maria C De Cola; Francesco Corallo; Deborah Pria; Viviana Lo Buono; Rocco S Calabrò
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Complications in cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: timing of the intervention.

Authors:  Taco Goedemans; Dagmar Verbaan; Olivier van der Veer; Maarten Bot; René Post; Jantien Hoogmoed; Michiel B Lequin; Dennis R Buis; W Peter Vandertop; Bert A Coert; Pepijn van den Munckhof
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 10.  Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy.

Authors:  Corrado Iaccarino; Angelos G Kolias; Louis-Georges Roumy; Kostas Fountas; Amos Olufemi Adeleye
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.