Literature DB >> 33354733

Consensus statement from the international consensus meeting on post-traumatic cranioplasty.

C Iaccarino1, A Kolias2,3, P D Adelson4, A M Rubiano5, E Viaroli6, A Buki7, G Cinalli8, K Fountas9, T Khan10, S Signoretti11, V Waran12, A O Adeleye13, R Amorim14, A Bertuccio15, A Cama16, R M Chesnut17,18, P De Bonis19, A Estraneo20,21, A Figaji22, S I Florian23, R Formisano24, P Frassanito25, C Gatos26, A Germanò27, C Giussani28, I Hossain29, P Kasprzak30, F La Porta31, D Lindner32, A I R Maas33, W Paiva34, P Palma35, K B Park36, P Peretta37, A Pompucci38, J Posti39, S K Sengupta40, A Sinha41, V Sinha42, R Stefini43, G Talamonti44, A Tasiou26, G Zona45,46, M Zucchelli47, P J Hutchinson6, F Servadei48,49.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to the lack of high-quality evidence which has hindered the development of evidence-based guidelines, there is a need to provide general guidance on cranioplasty (CP) following traumatic brain injury (TBI), as well as identify areas of ongoing uncertainty via a consensus-based approach.
METHODS: The international consensus meeting on post-traumatic CP was held during the International Conference on Recent Advances in Neurotraumatology (ICRAN), in Naples, Italy, in June 2018. This meeting was endorsed by the Neurotrauma Committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS), the NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, and several other neurotrauma organizations. Discussions and voting were organized around 5 pre-specified themes: (1) indications and technique, (2) materials, (3) timing, (4) hydrocephalus, and (5) paediatric CP.
RESULTS: The participants discussed published evidence on each topic and proposed consensus statements, which were subject to ratification using anonymous real-time voting. Statements required an agreement threshold of more than 70% for inclusion in the final recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: This document is the first set of practical consensus-based clinical recommendations on post-traumatic CP, focusing on timing, materials, complications, and surgical procedures. Future research directions are also presented.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cranioplasty; Decompressive craniectomy; Neurosurgery; Rehabilitation; hydrocephalus

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33354733      PMCID: PMC7815592          DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04663-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  80 in total

1.  Dynamics of subdural hygroma following decompressive craniectomy: a comparative study.

Authors:  Bizhan Aarabi; David Chesler; Christopher Maulucci; Tiffany Blacklock; Melvin Alexander
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.047

2.  Direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) of a customized titanium mesh for prosthetically guided bone regeneration of atrophic maxillary arches.

Authors:  L Ciocca; M Fantini; F De Crescenzio; G Corinaldesi; R Scotti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition.

Authors:  Nancy Carney; Annette M Totten; Cindy O'Reilly; Jamie S Ullman; Gregory W J Hawryluk; Michael J Bell; Susan L Bratton; Randall Chesnut; Odette A Harris; Niranjan Kissoon; Andres M Rubiano; Lori Shutter; Robert C Tasker; Monica S Vavilala; Jack Wilberger; David W Wright; Jamshid Ghajar
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  From decompressive craniectomy to cranioplasty and beyond-a pediatric neurosurgery perspective.

Authors:  Thomas Beez; Christopher Munoz-Bendix; Sebastian Alexander Ahmadi; Hans-Jakob Steiger; Kerim Beseoglu
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  D James Cooper; Jeffrey V Rosenfeld; Lynnette Murray; Yaseen M Arabi; Andrew R Davies; Paul D'Urso; Thomas Kossmann; Jennie Ponsford; Ian Seppelt; Peter Reilly; Rory Wolfe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Cranioplasty after postinjury decompressive craniectomy: is timing of the essence?

Authors:  Kathryn M Beauchamp; Jeffry Kashuk; Ernest E Moore; Gene Bolles; Craig Rabb; Joshua Seinfeld; Oszkar Szentirmai; Angela Sauaia
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-08

7.  Outcomes of cranial repair after craniectomy.

Authors:  Victor Chang; Paul Hartzfeld; Marianne Langlois; Asim Mahmood; Donald Seyfried
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Decompressive craniectomy bone flap hinged on the temporalis muscle: A new inexpensive use for an old neurosurgical technique.

Authors:  A Olufemi Adeleye; A Luqman Azeez
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-10-18

Review 9.  The Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in Limited Resource Environments.

Authors:  Angélica Clavijo; Ahsan A Khan; Juliana Mendoza; Jorge H Montenegro; Erica D Johnson; Amos O Adeleye; Andrés M Rubiano
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Current Applications and Future Perspectives of the Use of 3D Printing in Anatomical Training and Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Vivek Baskaran; Goran Štrkalj; Mirjana Štrkalj; Antonio Di Ieva
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.856

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Characterisation of Selected Materials in Medical Applications.

Authors:  Kacper Kroczek; Paweł Turek; Damian Mazur; Jacek Szczygielski; Damian Filip; Robert Brodowski; Krzysztof Balawender; Łukasz Przeszłowski; Bogumił Lewandowski; Stanisław Orkisz; Artur Mazur; Grzegorz Budzik; Józef Cebulski; Mariusz Oleksy
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 2.  Cranioplasty: A Multidisciplinary Approach.

Authors:  H Mee; F Anwar; I Timofeev; N Owens; K Grieve; G Whiting; K Alexander; K Kendrick; A Helmy; P Hutchinson; A Kolias
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-17

3.  The Application of Guideline-Based Care for Traumatic Brain and Spinal Cord Injury in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Provider-Based Survey.

Authors:  Jacob R Lepard; Saniya Mediratta; Andres M Rubiano; Kee B Park
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2022-03-26

4.  Current Concepts in Cranial Reconstruction: Review of Alloplastic Materials.

Authors:  Darin T Johnston; Steven J Lohmeier; Hannah C Langdell; Bryan J Pyfer; Jordan Komisarow; David B Powers; Detlev Erdmann
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-08-19

5.  Ultra-Early Cranioplasty versus Conventional Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study at an Academic Level 1 Trauma Center.

Authors:  Akal Sethi; Keanu Chee; Alia Kaakani; Kathryn Beauchamp; Jennifer Kang
Journal:  Neurotrauma Rep       Date:  2022-08-01

6.  Superimposing Pre-Cranioplasty on Pre-Craniectomy Images to Gauge Feasibility of Early Cranioplasty: A Proof of Concept.

Authors:  Yu-Ying Wu; Han-Jung Chen; Kang Lu; I-Fan Lin
Journal:  Neurotrauma Rep       Date:  2022-08-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.