Literature DB >> 27499122

Complications following cranioplasty and relationship to timing: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

James G Malcolm1, Rima S Rindler1, Jason K Chu1, Jonathan A Grossberg1, Gustavo Pradilla1, Faiz U Ahmad2.   

Abstract

The optimal timing of cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy has not been well established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between timing of cranioplasty and related complications. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane databases was performed using PRISMA guidelines for English-language articles published between 1990 and 2015. Case series, case-control and cohort studies, and clinical trials reporting timing and complication data for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy in adults were included. Extracted data included overall complications, infections, reoperations, intracranial hemorrhage, extra-axial fluid collections, hydrocephalus, seizures, and bone resorption for cranioplasty performed within (early) and beyond (late) 90days. Twenty-five of 321 articles met inclusion criteria for a total of 3126 patients (1421 early vs. 1705 late). All were retrospective observational studies. Early cranioplasty had significantly higher odds of hydrocephalus than late cranioplasty (Odds Ratio [OR] 2.38, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.25-4.52, p=0.008). There was no difference in odds of overall complications, infections, reoperations, intracranial hemorrhage, extra-axial fluid collections, seizures, or bone resorption. Subgroup analysis of trauma patients revealed a decreased odds of extra-axial fluid collection (OR 0.30, p=0.02) and an increased odds of hydrocephalus (OR 4.99, p=0.05). Early cranioplasty within 90days after decompressive craniectomy is associated with an increased odds of hydrocephalus than with later cranioplasty, but no difference in odds of developing other complications. Earlier cranioplasty in the trauma population is associated with fewer extra-axial fluid collections.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Craniectomy; Cranioplasty; Early; Timing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27499122     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  29 in total

1.  Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jack Henry; Michael Amoo; Adam Murphy; David P O'Brien
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: minor surgical complexity but still high periprocedural complication rates.

Authors:  Ehab Shiban; Nicole Lange; Antonia Hauser; Ann-Kathrin Jörger; Arthur Wagner; Bernhard Meyer; Jens Lehmberg
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Diagnostic Approach to Health Care- and Device-Associated Central Nervous System Infections.

Authors:  Ryan M Martin; Lara L Zimmermann; Mindy Huynh; Christopher R Polage
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Decompressive craniectomy and CSF disorders in children.

Authors:  Marie Manfiotto; Carmine Mottolese; Alexandru Szathmari; Pierre-Aurelien Beuriat; Olivier Klein; Matthieu Vinchon; Edouard Gimbert; Thomas Roujeau; Didier Scavarda; Michel Zerah; Federico Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Surface Area of Decompressive Craniectomy Predicts Bone Flap Failure after Autologous Cranioplasty: A Radiographic Cohort Study.

Authors:  W Chase Johnson; Vijay M Ravindra; Tristan Fielder; Mariam Ishaque; T Tyler Patterson; Michael J McGinity; John V Lacci; Ramesh Grandhi
Journal:  Neurotrauma Rep       Date:  2021-08-27

Review 6.  The Materials Utilized in Cranial Reconstruction: Past, Current, and Future.

Authors:  Haley Meyer; Syed I Khalid; Amir H Dorafshar; Richard W Byrne
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 0.558

7.  Analysis of PMMA versus CaP titanium-enhanced implants for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a retrospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Dominik Wesp; Harald Krenzlin; Dragan Jankovic; Malte Ottenhausen; Max Jägersberg; Florian Ringel; Naureen Keric
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 8.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of factors involved in bone flap resorption after decompressive craniectomy.

Authors:  Francesco Signorelli; Martina Giordano; Valerio Maria Caccavella; Eleonora Ioannoni; Camilla Gelormini; Anselmo Caricato; Alessandro Olivi; Nicola Montano
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Effect of cranioplasty timing on the functional neurological outcome and postoperative complications.

Authors:  Ahmed Aloraidi; Ali Alkhaibary; Ahoud Alharbi; Nada Alnefaie; Abeer Alaglan; Abdulaziz AlQarni; Turki Elarjani; Ala Arab; Jamal M Abdullah; Abdulaziz Oqalaa Almubarak; Munzir Abbas; Ibtesam Khairy; Wedad H Almadani; Mohammed Alowhaibi; Abdulaziz Alarifi; Sami Khairy; Ahmed Alkhani
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-06-07

Review 10.  Review of Cranioplasty after Decompressive Craniectomy.

Authors:  Yong Jun Cho; Suk Hyung Kang
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.