Literature DB >> 26056810

Early cranioplasty vs. late cranioplasty for the treatment of cranial defect: A systematic review.

Hao Xu1, Chaoshi Niu2, Xianming Fu2, Wanhai Ding2, Shiying Ling2, Xiaofeng Jiang2, Ying Ji2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cranioplasty is considered as a routine procedure in everyday neurosurgical practice for the patient with cranial defect, however, there is no established consensus on optimal surgical timing.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of early cranioplasty (1-3 months after DC) and late cranioplasty (3-6 months after DC) on the complications and recovery of neurological function in the management of patients who received decompressive craniotomy.
METHODS: In this paper, the authors report a systematic review and meta-analysis of operative time, complications and neurological function outcomes on different timing of cranioplasty. Randomized or non-randomized controlled trials of early cranioplasty and late cranioplasty surgery were considered for inclusion.
RESULTS: Nine published reports of eligible studies involving 1209 participants meet the inclusion criteria. Compared with late cranioplasty, early cranioplasty had no significant difference in overall complications [RR=1.14, 95%CI (0.83, 1.55), p>0.05], infection rates [RR=0.87, 95%CI (0.47, 1.61), p>0.05], intracranial hematoma [RR=1.09, 95%CI (0.53, 2.25), p>0.05]; subdural fluid collection [RR=0.47, 95%CI (0.15, 1.41), p>0.05]. However, early CP significantly reduced the duration of cranioplasty [mean difference=-13.46, 95%CI (-21.26, 5.67), p<0.05]. The postoperative hydrocephalus rates were significant higher in the early cranioplasty group [RR=2.67, 95%CI (1.24, 5.73), p<0.05].
CONCLUSION: Early CP can only reduce the duration of operation, but cannot reduce the complications of patients and even increase the risk of hydrocephalus. More evidence from advanced multi-center studies is needed to provide illumination for the timing selection of CP surgery.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cranioplasty; Decompressive craniotomy; Meta-analysis; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26056810     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.05.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  22 in total

1.  Calvaria critical-size defects in rats using piezoelectric equipment: a comparison with the classic trephine.

Authors:  R Senos; K D Hankenson
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Risk factors for surgical site infections and assessment of vancomycin powder as a preventive measure in patients undergoing first-time cranioplasty.

Authors:  Kingsley O Abode-Iyamah; Hsiu-Yin Chiang; Nolan Winslow; Brian Park; Mario Zanaty; Brian J Dlouhy; Oliver E Flouty; Zachary D Rasmussen; Loreen A Herwaldt; Jeremy D Greenlee
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Analysis of PMMA versus CaP titanium-enhanced implants for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a retrospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Dominik Wesp; Harald Krenzlin; Dragan Jankovic; Malte Ottenhausen; Max Jägersberg; Florian Ringel; Naureen Keric
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  Transforming Growth Factor-β3/Recombinant Human-like Collagen/Chitosan Freeze-Dried Sponge Primed With Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells Promotes Bone Regeneration in Calvarial Defect Rats.

Authors:  Shiyi Huang; Fenglin Yu; Yating Cheng; Yangfan Li; Yini Chen; Jianzhong Tang; Yu Bei; Qingxia Tang; Yueping Zhao; Yadong Huang; Qi Xiang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  Prospective randomized evaluation of therapeutic decompressive craniectomy in severe traumatic brain injury with mass lesions (PRECIS): study protocol for a controlled trial.

Authors:  He-xiang Zhao; Yi Liao; Ding Xu; Qiang-ping Wang; Qi Gan; Chao You; Chao-hua Yang
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.474

6.  Polymethylmethacrylate imbedded with antibiotics cranioplasty: An infection solution for moderate and large defects reconstruction?

Authors:  Paulo Valdeci Worm; Tobias Ludwig do Nascimento; Fabricio do Couto Nicola; Eduardo Farias Sanches; Carlos Fernando Dos Santos Moreira; Luiz Pedro Willimann Rogério; Marcelo Martins Dos Reis; Guilherme Finger; Marcus Vinicius Martins Collares
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-11-09

7.  Effects of Early Cranioplasty on the Restoration of Cognitive and Functional Impairments.

Authors:  Byung Wook Kim; Tae Uk Kim; Jung Keun Hyun
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2017-06-29

8.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of procalcitonin for early intracranial infection after craniotomy.

Authors:  Y Yu; H J Li
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.590

9.  Effect of cranioplasty timing on the functional neurological outcome and postoperative complications.

Authors:  Ahmed Aloraidi; Ali Alkhaibary; Ahoud Alharbi; Nada Alnefaie; Abeer Alaglan; Abdulaziz AlQarni; Turki Elarjani; Ala Arab; Jamal M Abdullah; Abdulaziz Oqalaa Almubarak; Munzir Abbas; Ibtesam Khairy; Wedad H Almadani; Mohammed Alowhaibi; Abdulaziz Alarifi; Sami Khairy; Ahmed Alkhani
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-06-07

Review 10.  Review of Cranioplasty after Decompressive Craniectomy.

Authors:  Yong Jun Cho; Suk Hyung Kang
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.