Literature DB >> 23394335

Predictors of cranioplasty complications in stroke and trauma patients.

Brian P Walcott1, Churl-Su Kwon, Sameer A Sheth, Corey R Fehnel, Robert M Koffie, Wael F Asaad, Brian V Nahed, Jean-Valery Coumans.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Decompressive craniectomy mandates subsequent cranioplasty. Complications of cranioplasty may be independent of the initial craniectomy, or they may be contingent upon the craniectomy. Authors of this study aimed to identify surgery- and patient-specific risk factors related to the development of surgical site infection and other complications following cranioplasty.
METHODS: A consecutive cohort of patients of all ages and both sexes who had undergone cranioplasty following craniectomy for stroke or trauma at a single institution in the period from May 2004 to May 2012 was retrospectively established. Patients who had undergone craniectomy for infectious lesions or neoplasia were excluded. A logistic regression analysis was performed to model and predict determinants related to infection following cranioplasty.
RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-nine patients met the study criteria. The overall rate of complication following cranioplasty was 23.85% (57 patients). Complications included, predominantly, surgical site infection, hydrocephalus, and new-onset seizures. Logistic regression analysis identified previous reoperation (OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.30-8.11, p = 0.01) and therapeutic indication for stroke (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.11-5.39, p = 0.03) as significantly associated with the development of cranioplasty infection. Patient age, location of cranioplasty, presence of an intracranial device, bone flap preservation method, cranioplasty material, booking method, and time interval > 90 days between initial craniectomy and cranioplasty were not predictive of the development of cranioplasty infection.
CONCLUSIONS: Cranioplasty complications are common. Cranioplasty infection rates are predicted by reoperation following craniectomy and therapeutic indication (stroke). These variables may be associated with patient-centered risk factors that increase cranioplasty infection risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23394335     DOI: 10.3171/2013.1.JNS121626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  33 in total

Review 1.  The storage of skull bone flaps for autologous cranioplasty: literature review.

Authors:  Vicente Mirabet; Daniel García; Nuria Yagüe; Luis Roberto Larrea; Cristina Arbona; Carlos Botella
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 1.522

2.  Cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: minor surgical complexity but still high periprocedural complication rates.

Authors:  Ehab Shiban; Nicole Lange; Antonia Hauser; Ann-Kathrin Jörger; Arthur Wagner; Bernhard Meyer; Jens Lehmberg
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Complications Associated with Decompressive Craniectomy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  David B Kurland; Ariana Khaladj-Ghom; Jesse A Stokum; Brianna Carusillo; Jason K Karimy; Volodymyr Gerzanich; Juan Sahuquillo; J Marc Simard
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Suturing-Free Artificial Dura with Dacron Heart Patch in Decompressive Craniectomy and Cranioplasty.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Yan Xue; Si-Shun Zhao; Ting-Jian Yang; Hao-Qing Song; Hong Liu
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 0.656

5.  Multidisciplinary approach for improved outcomes in secondary cranial reconstruction: introducing the pericranial-onlay cranioplasty technique.

Authors:  Chad R Gordon; Mark Fisher; Jason Liauw; Ioan Lina; Varun Puvanesarajah; Srinivas Susarla; Alexander Coon; Michael Lim; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Jon Weingart; Geoffrey Colby; Alessandro Olivi; Judy Huang
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Risk factors for surgical site infections and assessment of vancomycin powder as a preventive measure in patients undergoing first-time cranioplasty.

Authors:  Kingsley O Abode-Iyamah; Hsiu-Yin Chiang; Nolan Winslow; Brian Park; Mario Zanaty; Brian J Dlouhy; Oliver E Flouty; Zachary D Rasmussen; Loreen A Herwaldt; Jeremy D Greenlee
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Factors influencing the outcome (GOS) in reconstructive cranioplasty.

Authors:  U R Krause-Titz; N Warneke; S Freitag-Wolf; H Barth; H M Mehdorn
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 8.  Complications and cosmetic outcomes of materials used in cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy-a systematic review, pairwise meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jakob V E Gerstl; Luis F Rendon; Shane M Burke; Joanne Doucette; Rania A Mekary; Timothy R Smith
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Surface Area of Decompressive Craniectomy Predicts Bone Flap Failure after Autologous Cranioplasty: A Radiographic Cohort Study.

Authors:  W Chase Johnson; Vijay M Ravindra; Tristan Fielder; Mariam Ishaque; T Tyler Patterson; Michael J McGinity; John V Lacci; Ramesh Grandhi
Journal:  Neurotrauma Rep       Date:  2021-08-27

10.  Bone flap necrosis after decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction.

Authors:  Christian Ewald; Pedro Duenisch; Jan Walter; Theresa Götz; Otto W Witte; Rolf Kalff; Albrecht Günther
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.210

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.