| Literature DB >> 32408862 |
Kwon Hui Seo1, Kyung Mi Kim2, Hyunji John1, Joo Hyun Jun3, Minsoo Han1, Soyoun Kim1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immobilization with cervical spine worsens endotracheal intubation condition. Though various intubation devices have been demonstrated to perform well in oral endotracheal intubation, limited information is available concerning nasotracheal intubation (NTI) in patients with cervical spine immobilization. The present study compared the performance of the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope with the McCoy laryngoscope for NTI in patients with simulated cervical spine injuries.Entities:
Keywords: Cervical spine; Immobilization; Intratracheal; Intubation; Laryngoscopes; Videolaryngoscope
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32408862 PMCID: PMC7227116 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-020-01021-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Anesthesiol ISSN: 1471-2253 Impact factor: 2.217
Modified nasal intubation-difficulty scale (NIDS)
| Parameters | Score |
|---|---|
| N1: Intubation attempts | Each additional intubation attempt after the first one adds 1 point |
| N2: Operators to attempt intubation | Each additional operator required to attempt intubation adds 1 point |
| N3: Alternative intubation techniques or change head position | Each alternative intubation technique or change head position adds 1 point |
| N4: Glottic exposure | 0 = good visualization of vocal cords with little manipulation 1 = tools manipulated in all directions to identify the vocal cords 2 = tools extensively manipulated in all directions to identify the vocal cords |
| N5: Lifting force required to expose the vocal cords | 0 = lifting without assistance 1 = lifting required by assistant to improve view of the vocal cords |
| N6: Optimize glottis exposure with BURP (backward, upward and right ward pressure) | 0 = none 1 = BURP applied |
| N7: Techniques to aid intubation | 0 = none 1 = cuff inflation or Magill forceps |
Fig. 1CONSORT diagram depicting the flow of participants
Demographic and preoperative data of patients
| Patient characteristics | Group C | Group M |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 47 (30.8–55.8) | 36 (26.0–50.0) |
| Gender (M/F) (n) | 29/19 | 27/20 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.8 ± 3.5 | 24.4 ± 3.8 |
| ASA class (n) | ||
| I/II/III | 10/33/5 | 17/26/4 |
| Mallampati class (n) | ||
| I/II/III/IV | 21/18/5/4 | 16/19/10/2 |
| Thyromental distance (cm) | 8.0 (8.0–9.0) | 8.0 (8.0–10.0) |
| Neck circumference (cm) | 37.5 (34.0–39.8) | 38.0 (36.0–40.0) |
| Inter-incisor distance (cm) | ||
| Without collar | 4.0 (4.0–5.0) | 4.0 (4.0–5.0) |
| With collar | 2.5 (2.0–3.0) | 2.0 (2.0–3.0) |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD, median (interquartile range 25th–75th) or number (%), SDStandard deviation
BMI Body mass index, ASA American society of anesthesiologists
Fig. 2(a) Lateral picture of a patient with simulated cervical spine immobilization using the Philadelphia neck collar. (b) Lateral radiograph of a patient undergoing nasotracheal intubation with the McCoy laryngoscope. The McCoy laryngoscope significantly elevates the epiglottis; therefore, Magill forceps are frequently needed to navigate the nasotracheal tube into the glottic inlet. McCoy: McCoy laryngoscope, MF: Magill forceps, E: Epiglottis, NTT: nasotracheal tube, arrow without marking = glottic inlet. (c) Lateral radiograph of a patient undergoing nasotracheal intubation with C-MAC videolaryngoscope. C-MAC videolaryngoscope maintains the configuration of the airway in its original position, which allows for alignment of the nasal tube tip with the glottic inlet and smooth advancement of the NTT. C-MAC: C-MAC videolaryngoscope. The picture and radiographs were taken after obtaining informed consent
Intubation profiles compared between CMAC video-laryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope according to each intubation step
| Characteristics | Group C | Group M | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nose to oropharynx | |||
| Grade of difficulty | 0.434 | ||
| 1 | 43 (89.6) | 42 (89.4) | |
| 2 | 2 (4.2) | 4 (8.5) | |
| 3 | 3 (6.3) | 1 (2.1) | |
| Time (S) | 9.6 ± 5.6 | 8.5 ± 2.6 | 0.563 |
| Oropharynx to glottic inlet | |||
| Grade of difficulty | < 0.001 | ||
| 1 | 37 (77.1) | 12 (25.5) | |
| 2 | 11 (22.9) | 35 (74.5) | |
| Time (S) | 13.0 ± 5.3 | 17.7 ± 7.7 | 0.004 |
| Glottic inlet to trachea | |||
| Grade of difficulty | 0.002 | ||
| 1 | 18 (37.5) | 5 (10.6) | |
| 2 | 30 (62.5) | 42 (89.4) | |
| Time (S) | 16.8 ± 7.4 | 22.0 ± 11.4 | 0.027 |
| 39.5 ± 11.4 | 48.1 ± 13.9 | 0.004 | |
Values are median ± SD or number of patients (%)
Intubation profiles in the overall intubation period
| Characteristics | Group C | Group M | |
|---|---|---|---|
| VAS of facemask ventilation difficulty | 2.1 ± 1.6 | 2.6 ± 1.7 | 0.135 |
| Cormack-Lehane grade (I/II/III/IV) | 25/16/7/0 | 4/19/16/8 | < 0.001 |
| POGO scores (%) | 79.6 ± 20.6 | 50.6 ± 25.9 | < 0.001 |
| NIDS | 0.034 | ||
| 0 (no difficulty) | 10 (20.8) | 2 (4.3) | |
| 1–5 (minor difficulty) | 38 (79.2) | 44 (93.6) | |
| 6–11 (moderated difficulty) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.1) | |
| ≥ 12 (profound difficulty) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Use of Magill’s forceps (Yes/No) | 27/21 (56.3/43.7) | 40/7 (85.1/14.9) | 0.002 |
| Epistaxis (Yes/No) | 8/40 (16.7/83.3) | 5/42 (10.6/89.4) | 0.504 |
| Hoarseness (Yes/No) | 0/48 (0/100) | 1/46 (2.1/97.9) | 0.310 |
| VAS of sore throat | 5.0 (4.0–6.0) | 37.5 (34.0–39.8) | 0.911 |
Values are median ± SD, median (interquartile range 25th–75th) or number (%)
VAS visual analog scale, POGO percentage of glottic opening, NIDS Nasal intubation difficulty scale
Fig. 3Kaplan-Meier plot demonstrating the proportion of patients intubated vs time. Pooled log-rank test. P = 0.002