Literature DB >> 28846537

A comparison of the video laryngoscopes with Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation.

Kuang-Yi Tseng1, I-Cheng Lu2, Ya-Chun Shen1, Chia-Heng Lin1, Po-Nien Chen1, Kuang-I Cheng3.   

Abstract

Nasotracheal intubation (NTI) is usually required in patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery. Though video-scopes have been demonstrated to perform well in oral endotracheal intubation, limited information is available concerning NTI. The aim of the study is to compare the efficiency of video-scopes and the traditional direct laryngoscopy in NTI. One hundred and eight patients scheduled for elective oro-maxillofacial surgery under nasotracheal intubation general anesthesia were randomly allocated into one of 3 groups of GlideScope, Pentax AirWay Scope, or Macintosh laryngoscope respectively. The primary outcome measures were total intubation time and each separate time interval (time A: for placement for the nasotracheal tube from selected nostril to oropharynx; time B: for use of devices to view the glottic opening; time C: for advancing nasotracheal tube from oropharynx into trachea and removing the scope from the oral cavity). The secondary outcomes were measurement of scores of modified naso-intubation difficulty scale (MNIDS) and attempts at intubation.
RESULTS: Mean total intubation time and time C interval were taken with GlideScope (33.1 s and 9.7 s), Pentax (38.4 s and 12.9 s), and Macintosh (42.2 s and 14.9 s) respectively. There was a significant difference among the groups (total time, P = 0.03; time C, P = 0.02). The median score of MNIDS was significantly lower using GlideScope or Pentax compared with using Macintosh in NTI (P = 0.037) and difficult intubation grading by MNIDS presented as easier in the GlideScope group than in the Macintosh group (0.016). Using GlideScope, intubation was successful at the first attempt in 80% patients whereas only 65% and 72.5% with the Pentax and Macintosh (P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: As compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope, the GlideScope video laryngoscope facilitated nasotracheal intubations with shortened intubation time and reduced intubation difficulty in patients undergoing oromaxillofacial surgery.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GlideScope; Macintosh laryngoscope; Nasotracheal intubation (NTI); Pentax airway scope

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28846537     DOI: 10.1016/j.aja.2017.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Anesthesiol        ISSN: 2468-824X


  7 in total

1.  A comparison of McGrath MAC, Pentax AWS, and Macintosh direct laryngoscopes for nasotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yun Jeong Chae; Dae Hee Kim; Eun Jeong Park; Juyeon Oh; In Kyong Yi
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study.

Authors:  Kwon Hui Seo; Kyung Mi Kim; Hyunji John; Joo Hyun Jun; Minsoo Han; Soyoun Kim
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  A randomized controlled trial comparing McGRATH series 5 videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Reshma Ambulkar; Priya Ranganathan; Sukhada Savarkar; Jigeeshu V Divatia
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-01-18

4.  Comparative evaluation of glidescope videolaryngosocope and conventional macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing oropharyngeal cancer surgeries: A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Abhishek Kumar; Nishkarsh Gupta; Vinod Kumar; Sachidanand Jee Bharti; Rakesh Garg; Rajeev Kumar; Sushma Bhatnagar
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-11-25

5.  Comparative Analysis of the Usefulness of the GlideScope®, Macintosh, and McCoy Laryngoscopes for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients with Obesity: A Randomized, Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Seyed Reza Akbarzadeh; Maryar Taghavi Gillani; Masoumeh Tabari; Negar Morovatdar
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2017-12-25

6.  Suitability of Nasotracheal Intubation using King Vision and TruviewPCD Video Laryngoscopes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Gayatri Mishra; Varghese Mammen Philip; Vadlamudi Reddy Hemanth Kumar; Thiyagarajan Sivashanmugam
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

7.  Ease of intubation and hemodynamic responses to nasotracheal intubation using C-MAC videolaryngoscope with D blade: A comparison with use of traditional Macintosh laryngoscope.

Authors:  Sunil Rajan; Dilesh Kadapamannil; Kaushik Barua; Pulak Tosh; Jerry Paul; Lakshmi Kumar
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.