| Literature DB >> 28846537 |
Kuang-Yi Tseng1, I-Cheng Lu2, Ya-Chun Shen1, Chia-Heng Lin1, Po-Nien Chen1, Kuang-I Cheng3.
Abstract
Nasotracheal intubation (NTI) is usually required in patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery. Though video-scopes have been demonstrated to perform well in oral endotracheal intubation, limited information is available concerning NTI. The aim of the study is to compare the efficiency of video-scopes and the traditional direct laryngoscopy in NTI. One hundred and eight patients scheduled for elective oro-maxillofacial surgery under nasotracheal intubation general anesthesia were randomly allocated into one of 3 groups of GlideScope, Pentax AirWay Scope, or Macintosh laryngoscope respectively. The primary outcome measures were total intubation time and each separate time interval (time A: for placement for the nasotracheal tube from selected nostril to oropharynx; time B: for use of devices to view the glottic opening; time C: for advancing nasotracheal tube from oropharynx into trachea and removing the scope from the oral cavity). The secondary outcomes were measurement of scores of modified naso-intubation difficulty scale (MNIDS) and attempts at intubation.Entities:
Keywords: GlideScope; Macintosh laryngoscope; Nasotracheal intubation (NTI); Pentax airway scope
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28846537 DOI: 10.1016/j.aja.2017.05.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Anesthesiol ISSN: 2468-824X