Literature DB >> 17175432

A clinical assessment of the Glidescope videolaryngoscope in nasotracheal intubation with general anesthesia.

Fushan Xue1, Guohua Zhang, Jin Liu, Xuanying Li, Haitao Sun, Xiao Wang, Chengwen Li, Kunpeng Liu, Yachao Xu, Yi Liu.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Glidescope videolaryngoscope as a device to aid nasotracheal intubation, and to determine whether the GSVL provides a better laryngeal view in patients with difficult laryngoscopy compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope.
DESIGN: Prospective, clinical study.
SETTING: Two university hospitals. PATIENTS: 156 healthy adult ASA physical status I and II undergoing elective plastic and intraoral surgery with general anesthesia.
INTERVENTIONS: After anesthesia induction with intravenous injection of fentanyl 2 microg/kg, propofol 2 mg/kg, and vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg, nasotracheal intubation was performed using GSVL. MEASUREMENTS: Preoperative airway measurements were taken to predict potential difficult airways. During nasotracheal intubation using GSVL, laryngeal views, times required for full visualization of glottis and successful intubation, difficulty encountered and auxiliary maneuvers adopted, and upper airway trauma were recorded. The laryngeal views obtained by GSVL and by Macintosh laryngoscope were compared. MAIN
RESULTS: The laryngeal views obtained by GSVL in all patients were Cormack and Lehane (C&L) grades I and II, and the success rate of intubation using GSVL at one attempt was 98.1%. The times required for visualization of the glottis and successful intubation were 40.2 +/- 11.5 s and 52.7 +/- 12.3 seconds, respectively. Patients with C&L grade II needed more auxiliary maneuvers to achieve successful intubation than did those with C&L grade I (P < 0.001). In 36 patients with potential difficult airways, the frequency of difficult laryngoscopy (C&L grades III and IV) with the Macintosh laryngoscope (58.3%) was significantly higher than with the GSVL (0%, P < 0.05). The frequency of minor upper airway trauma was 4.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: The GSVL is an effective device for nasotracheal intubation and may be incorporated easily into routine clinical practice. Compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope, the GSVL can provide an improved laryngeal view in the patient with difficult airway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17175432     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  11 in total

1.  Nasotracheal intubation using the Airtraq versus Macintosh laryngoscope: a manikin study.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Hirabayashi; Norimasa Seo
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2008

2.  Distortion of anterior airway anatomy during laryngoscopy with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Hirabayashi; Akifumi Fujita; Norimasa Seo; Hideharu Sugimoto
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Use of Airtraq, C-Mac, and Glidescope laryngoscope is better than Macintosh in novice medical students' hands: A manikin study.

Authors:  Abdullah M Kaki; Waleed A Almarakbi; Hazem M Fawzi; Abdulaziz M Boker
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2011-10

Review 4.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates.

Authors:  Krithika Lingappan; Jennifer L Arnold; Caraciolo J Fernandes; Mohan Pammi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-04

5.  Orotracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients, comparison of GlideScope(®) video laryngoscope and the LMA CTrach™ with direct laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Gamal T Yousef; Dief A Abdalgalil; Tamer H Ibrahim
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2012 Jul-Dec

6.  Randomized comparison of the effectiveness of nasal intubation using a GlideScope video laryngoscope with Magill forceps versus vascular forceps in patients with a normal airway.

Authors:  Jong H Yeom; Mi K Oh; Woo J Shin; Dae W Ahn; Woo J Jeon; Sang Y Cho
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  A comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope, McGrath video laryngoscope, and Pentax Airway Scope in paediatric nasotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Ji Young Yoo; Yun Jeong Chae; Young Bok Lee; Sujin Kim; Jaemoon Lee; Dae Hee Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study.

Authors:  Kwon Hui Seo; Kyung Mi Kim; Hyunji John; Joo Hyun Jun; Minsoo Han; Soyoun Kim
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  A randomized controlled trial comparing McGRATH series 5 videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Reshma Ambulkar; Priya Ranganathan; Sukhada Savarkar; Jigeeshu V Divatia
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-01-18

10.  Does really selection of nostril affect performance of nasotracheal intubation with nasotracheal Airtraq®?

Authors:  Liu-Jia-Zi Shao; Shaohua Liu; Fushan Xue
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 0.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.