Literature DB >> 6864837

Efficacy of cervical spine immobilization methods.

S Podolsky, L J Baraff, R R Simon, J R Hoffman, B Larmon, W Ablon.   

Abstract

Cervical spine immobilization devices are widely used to stabilize the cervical spine and prevent neurologic deficits associated with unstable fractures. In order to quantitate their efficacy we measured controlled cervical spine motion in three axes, using six different immobilization methods in 25 volunteers instructed to actively move their necks as much as possible in the directions of flexion, extension, rotation, and lateral bending while lying supine. Control measurements were made with no device and measurements were repeated following immobilization with: soft collar (SC), hard collar (HC), extrication collar (EC), Philadelphia collar (PC), bilateral sandbags joined with 3-inch cloth tape across the forehead (ST), and the combination of sandbags, tape, and the Philadelphia collar (ST/PC). Neck movements were reported in degrees recorded on a hand-held goniometer. There were no significant differences between control and SC measurements except in rotary movement. PC was not significantly better than the other two types of hard collars, except in limiting extension. ST immobilization was significantly better than any of the other four methods used alone, for all four movements. The addition of PC to ST was significantly more effective in reducing extension only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6864837     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-198306000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  37 in total

1.  Cervical Spine Motion in Football Players During 3 Airway-Exposure Techniques.

Authors:  Richard Ray; Carl Luchies; Margaret Abfall Frens; Wendy Hughes; Richard Sturmfels
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Emergency management of the airway outside the operating room.

Authors:  D L Bogdonoff; D J Stone
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Comparison of Cervical Spine Motion During Application Among 4 Rigid Immobilization Collars.

Authors:  Colleen Y. James; Bryan L. Riemann; Barry A. Munkasy; A Barry Joyner
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  The efficacy of the rapid form cervical vacuum immobilizer in cervical spine immobilization of the equipped football player.

Authors:  J Ransone; R Kersey; K Walsh
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Airway preparation techniques for the cervical spine-injured football player.

Authors:  R Ray; C Luchies; D Bazuin; R N Farrell
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Rigid cervical collars and intracranial pressure.

Authors:  G R Craig; M S Nielsen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review.

Authors:  Terje Sundstrøm; Helge Asbjørnsen; Samer Habiba; Geir Arne Sunde; Knut Wester
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Removal of the Long Spine Board From Clinical Practice: A Historical Perspective.

Authors:  Francis X Feld
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Pre-hospital care time intervals among victims of road traffic injuries in Iran. A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Maryam Bigdeli; Davoud Khorasani-Zavareh; Reza Mohammadi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Post-crash management of road traffic injury victims in Iran. Stakeholders' views on current barriers and potential facilitators.

Authors:  Davoud Khorasani-Zavareh; Hamid Reza Khankeh; Reza Mohammadi; Lucie Laflamme; Ali Bikmoradi; Bo J A Haglund
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2009-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.