Literature DB >> 9754506

Assessment of airway visualization: validation of the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scale.

R M Levitan1, E A Ochroch, S Kush, F S Shofer, J E Hollander.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Research defining optimal methods of intubation has been limited by the lack of a validated outcome measure to assess airway visualization. The objective of this study was to develop a reliable scale for the assessment of airway visualization during endotracheal intubation.
METHODS: This prospective study was performed to assess the intra- and interphysician reliabilities of emergency physicians (EPs) for estimating the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) that is visualized during direct laryngoscopy. Using video images of laryngeal views obtained from a commercially available videotape, still slide images were prepared representing glottic openings ranging from 0% to 100%. Five EPs, blinded to study objective, reviewed 25 pairs of airway slides (50 slides total). For each slide, the physicians recorded the POGO and their scores using a modified Cormack-Lehane (MCL) scale, where grade I is a view of the full glottic opening, MCL grade II is a partial view of the glottic opening, and MCL grade III is a view of the epiglottis only. Inter- and intraphysician reliabilities were assessed using the kappa statistic (K) for MCL grade and intraclass correlation coefficient for the POGO scores.
RESULTS: For the POGO score, the degree of intrarater reliability was very good, with an intraphysician correlation of 0.85 and an interphysician correlation of 0.74. For the MCL score, the intraphysician concordance had a K of 0.71, and interphysician concordance was also good, with a kappa of 0.59.
CONCLUSION: Both the modified version of the Cormack-Lehane grading classification and the POGO score have good interphysician and intraphysician reliabilities. Because the POGO score can distinguish patients with large and small degrees of partial glottic visibility, it might provide a better outcome for assessing the difference between various intubation techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9754506     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02823.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  50 in total

1.  A comparison of direct laryngoscopic views depending on pillow height.

Authors:  Sang-Heon Park; Hee-Pyoung Park; Young-Tae Jeon; Jung-Won Hwang; Jin-Hee Kim; Jae-Hyon Bahk
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation performed with video and direct laryngoscopy in patients scheduled for major cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Gamze Sarkılar; Mehmet Sargın; Tuba Berra Sarıtaş; Hale Borazan; Funda Gök; Alper Kılıçaslan; Şeref Otelcioğlu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

3.  The visualization of glottis during intubation's efforts in super obese patients: a comparison of total track video intubating laryngeal mask and McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope.

Authors:  Tomasz Gaszyński
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Video versus direct laryngoscopy on successful first-pass endotracheal intubation in ICU patients.

Authors:  Yong-Xia Gao; Yan-Bo Song; Ze-Juan Gu; Jin-Song Zhang; Xu-Feng Chen; Hao Sun; Zhen Lu
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2018

5.  Variables associated with successful intubation attempts using video laryngoscopy: a preliminary report in a helicopter emergency medical service.

Authors:  Jestin N Carlson; Jorge Quintero; Francis X Guyette; Clifton W Callaway; James J Menegazzi
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.077

6.  A prospective randomized comparison of airway seal using the novel vision-guided insertion of LMA-Supreme® and LMA-Protector®.

Authors:  André A J van Zundert; Kerstin H Wyssusek; Anita Pelecanos; Michelle Roets; Chandra M Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 7.  GlideScope video laryngoscopy use tracheal intubation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a series of four cases and literature review.

Authors:  Vahap Saricicek; Ayse Mizrak; Rauf Gul; Sitki Goksu; Mehmet Cesur
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Video-assisted versus conventional tracheal intubation in morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  Gilles Dhonneur; Widad Abdi; Serge K Ndoko; Roland Amathieu; Nabil Risk; Lodfi El Housseini; Claude Polliand; Gerard Champault; Xavier Combes; Loïc Tual
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 9.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Andrew R Butler; Joshua Parker; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-15

10.  A comparative study of glottis visualization according to the method of lifting the epiglottis in video laryngoscopy: indirect and direct lifting methods.

Authors:  Ji Youn Oh; Ji Hye Lee; Yu Yil Kim; Seung Min Baek; Da Wa Jung; Ji Hun Park
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2021-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.