Literature DB >> 32368860

Effect of low-thermal dissection device versus conventional electrocautery in mastectomy for female-to-male transgender patients.

Torsten Schlosshauer1,2, Marcus Kiehlmann1, Marc-Oliver Riener3,4, Jens Rothenberger1, Robert Sader5, Ulrich M Rieger1.   

Abstract

Subcutaneous mastectomy, the first step in sexual reassignment surgery of female-to-male transsexuals, is associated with high rates of complication and revision surgery. Also, conventional electrosurgery and the associated thermal tissue damage may compromise outcome. This retrospective randomised clinical study evaluated the effect of low-thermal plasma dissection device (PEAK PlasmaBlade, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) in comparison with conventional electrosurgery. A total of 17 female-to-male transsexuals undergoing mastectomy were randomised to PEAK PlasmaBlade on one breast side and to monopolar electrosurgery on the other side of the same patient. Wounds of 17 patients were examined histologically for acute thermal injury. Significantly less total volume of drain output (58.8 ± 37.4 mL vs 98.5 ± 76.4 mL; P = .012) was found on the PEAK PlasmaBlade side compared with the electrosurgery side. Duration of drain was significantly shorter on the PEAK PlasmaBlade side (2.5 ± 0.7 days vs 3.2 ± 0.6 days; P = .010). Furthermore, the PEAK PlasmaBlade side showed fewer thermal damages (41.2% vs 82.4%; P = .039) and thermal injury depth from PEAK PlasmaBlade side was less (3170 vs 4060 μm). PEAK PlasmaBlade appears to be superior to monopolar electrosurgery for mastectomy in female-to-male transsexuals, because it demonstrated less thermal tissue damage, less total volume of drain output, and shorter duration of drain, resulting in faster wound healing.
© 2020 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PEAK PlasmaBlade; drain output; duration of drain; electrosurgery; mastectomy; transsexuals

Year:  2020        PMID: 32368860      PMCID: PMC7949210          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  26 in total

1.  Pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) for intraocular surgery.

Authors:  D V Palanker; J M Miller; M F Marmor; S R Sanislo; P Huie; M S Blumenkranz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Comparison of wound-healing characteristics with feedback circuit electrosurgical generators in a porcine model.

Authors:  Harrison S Pollinger; Gamal Mostafa; Kristi L Harold; Catherine E Austin; Kent W Kercher; Brent D Matthews
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 3.  Concepts, considerations, and concerns on the cutting edge of radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Daniel B Brown
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Comparative analysis on the effect of low-thermal plasma dissection device (PEAK PlasmaBlade) versus conventional electro surgery in post-bariatric body-contouring procedures: A retrospective randomised clinical study.

Authors:  Torsten Schlosshauer; Marcus Kiehlmann; Pablo Ramirez; Marc-Oliver Riener; Gabriel Djedovic; Ulrich M Rieger
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Chest-wall contouring surgery in female-to-male transsexuals: a new algorithm.

Authors:  Stan Monstrey; Gennaro Selvaggi; Peter Ceulemans; Koen Van Landuyt; Cameron Bowman; Phillip Blondeel; Moustapha Hamdi; Griet De Cuypere
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Comparative healing of rat fascia following incision with three surgical instruments.

Authors:  Edward I Chang; Grace A Carlson; Joshua G Vose; Eric J Huang; George P Yang
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Histologic evaluation of porcine skin incisions produced by CO2 laser, electrosurgery, and scalpel.

Authors:  D S Arashiro; J W Rapley; C M Cobb; W J Killoy
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Comparative analysis on the effect of low-thermal plasma dissection device (PEAK PlasmaBlade) vs conventional electrosurgery in post-bariatric abdominoplasty: A retrospective randomised clinical study.

Authors:  Torsten Schlosshauer; Marcus Kiehlmann; Marc-Oliver Riener; Robert Sader; Ulrich M Rieger
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK-fc) for dissection of retinal tissue.

Authors:  Siegfried G Priglinger; Christos Haritoglou; Daniel V Palanker; Claudia S Alge; Arnd Gandorfer; Anselm Kampik
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10

10.  Wound healing of skin incisions produced by ultrasonically vibrating knife, scalpel, electrosurgery, and carbon dioxide laser.

Authors:  R Hambley; P A Hebda; E Abell; B A Cohen; B V Jegasothy
Journal:  J Dermatol Surg Oncol       Date:  1988-11
View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of low-thermal dissection device versus conventional electrocautery in mastectomy for female-to-male transgender patients.

Authors:  Torsten Schlosshauer; Marcus Kiehlmann; Marc-Oliver Riener; Jens Rothenberger; Robert Sader; Ulrich M Rieger
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Cancer treatment with gas plasma and with gas plasma-activated liquid: positives, potentials and problems of clinical translation.

Authors:  Juliette C Harley; Natalka Suchowerska; David R McKenzie
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2020-08-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.