Literature DB >> 34879207

Rabbits use both spectral and temporal cues to discriminate the fundamental frequency of harmonic complexes with missing fundamentals.

Joseph D Wagner1,2, Alice Gelman1, Kenneth E Hancock1,3, Yoojin Chung1,3, Bertrand Delgutte1,3.   

Abstract

The pitch of harmonic complex tones (HCTs) common in speech, music, and animal vocalizations plays a key role in the perceptual organization of sound. Unraveling the neural mechanisms of pitch perception requires animal models, but little is known about complex pitch perception by animals, and some species appear to use different pitch mechanisms than humans. Here, we tested rabbits' ability to discriminate the fundamental frequency (F0) of HCTs with missing fundamentals, using a behavioral paradigm inspired by foraging behavior in which rabbits learned to harness a spatial gradient in F0 to find the location of a virtual target within a room for a food reward. Rabbits were initially trained to discriminate HCTs with F0s in the range 400-800 Hz and with harmonics covering a wide frequency range (800-16,000 Hz) and then tested with stimuli differing in spectral composition to test the role of harmonic resolvability (experiment 1) or in F0 range (experiment 2) or in both F0 and spectral content (experiment 3). Together, these experiments show that rabbits can discriminate HCTs over a wide F0 range (200-1,600 Hz) encompassing the range of conspecific vocalizations and can use either the spectral pattern of harmonics resolved by the cochlea for higher F0s or temporal envelope cues resulting from interaction between unresolved harmonics for lower F0s. The qualitative similarity of these results to human performance supports the use of rabbits as an animal model for studies of pitch mechanisms, providing species differences in cochlear frequency selectivity and F0 range of vocalizations are taken into account.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Understanding the neural mechanisms of pitch perception requires experiments in animal models, but little is known about pitch perception by animals. Here we show that rabbits, a popular animal in auditory neuroscience, can discriminate complex sounds differing in pitch using either spectral cues or temporal cues. The results suggest that the role of spectral cues in pitch perception by animals may have been underestimated by predominantly testing low frequencies in the range of human voice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory behavior; pitch; place coding; rabbit; temporal coding

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34879207      PMCID: PMC8759963          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00366.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  88 in total

1.  Perception of the missing fundamental by chinchillas in the presence of low-pass masking noise.

Authors:  William P Shofner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-25

2.  Neural rate and timing cues for detection and discrimination of amplitude-modulated tones in the awake rabbit inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Virtual vocalization stimuli for investigating neural representations of species-specific vocalizations.

Authors:  Christopher DiMattina; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Suboptimal use of neural information in a mammalian auditory system.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney; Muhammad S A Zilany; Nicholas J Huang; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. I. Pitch and pitch salience.

Authors:  P A Cariani; B Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Perception of pitch by goldfish.

Authors:  Richard R Fay
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  A quantitative acoustic analysis of the vocal repertoire of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  James A Agamaite; Chia-Jung Chang; Michael S Osmanski; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Parameters From the Complete Phonatory Range of an Excised Rabbit Larynx.

Authors:  Randal D Mills; Keith Dodd; Alex Ablavsky; Erin Devine; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Detection of changes in timbre and harmonicity in complex sounds by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  B Lohr; R J Dooling
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Processing pitch in a nonhuman mammal (Chinchilla laniger).

Authors:  William P Shofner; Megan Chaney
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 2.231

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cochlear tuning and the peripheral representation of harmonic sounds in mammals.

Authors:  William P Shofner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.389

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.