Literature DB >> 33261392

Pitch perception at very high frequencies: On psychometric functions and integration of frequency information.

Hedwig E Gockel1, Brian C J Moore2, Robert P Carlyon1.   

Abstract

Lau et al. [J. Neurosci. 37, 9013-9021 (2017)] showed that discrimination of the fundamental frequency (F0) of complex tones with components in a high-frequency region was better than predicted from the optimal combination of information from the individual harmonics. The predictions depend on the assumption that psychometric functions for frequency discrimination have a slope of 1 at high frequencies. This was tested by measuring psychometric functions for F0 discrimination and frequency discrimination. Difference limens for F0 (F0DLs) and difference limens for frequency for each frequency component were also measured. Complex tones contained harmonics 6-10 and had F0s of 280 or 1400 Hz. Thresholds were measured using 210-ms tones presented diotically in diotic threshold-equalizing noise (TEN), and 1000-ms tones presented diotically in dichotic TEN. The slopes of the psychometric functions were close to 1 for all frequencies and F0s. The ratio of predicted to observed F0DLs was around 1 or smaller for both F0s, i.e., not super-optimal, and was significantly smaller for the low than for the high F0. The results are consistent with the idea that place information alone can convey pitch, but pitch is more salient when phase-locking information is available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33261392      PMCID: PMC7613188          DOI: 10.1121/10.0002668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  40 in total

1.  Evaluating auditory performance limits: II. One-parameter discrimination with random-level variation.

Authors:  M G Heinz; H S Colburn; L H Carney
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.

Authors:  B C Moore; M Huss; D A Vickers; B R Glasberg; J I Alcántara
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  2000-08

3.  Cancellation model of pitch perception.

Authors:  A de Cheveigné
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase invariance, pitch circularity, rate pitch, and the dominance region for pitch.

Authors:  P A Cariani; B Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A unitary model of pitch perception.

Authors:  R Meddis; L O'Mard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effect of harmonic components on frequency discrimination.

Authors:  G B Henning; S L Grosberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Superoptimal Perceptual Integration Suggests a Place-Based Representation of Pitch at High Frequencies.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A two-filter model for frequency discrimination.

Authors:  H Dai; Q T Nguyen; D M Green
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Representation of steady-state vowels in the temporal aspects of the discharge patterns of populations of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  E D Young; M B Sachs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory frequency and intensity discrimination explained using a cortical population rate code.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Paul R Schrater; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  3 in total

1.  On musical interval perception for complex tones at very high frequencies.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Human discrimination and modeling of high-frequency complex tones shed light on the neural codes for pitch.

Authors:  Daniel R Guest; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Temporal Pitch Sensitivity in an Animal Model: Psychophysics and Scalp Recordings : Temporal Pitch Sensitivity in Cat.

Authors:  Matthew L Richardson; François Guérit; Robin Gransier; Jan Wouters; Robert P Carlyon; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.