Literature DB >> 3944337

Rate discrimination of high-pass-filtered pulse trains.

J K Cullen, G R Long.   

Abstract

Difference limens for trains of 30-microseconds pulses were determined for repetition rates of 50, 100, 200, 400, and 800 pulses per second under conditions of no filtering and high-pass filtering (115 dB/oct) with corner frequencies of 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10 kHz. Low-pass-filtered noise was mixed with the trains of impulses to preclude discrimination on the basis of potential low-frequency signal components. Measures were obtained from four trained listeners at a signal level of 30 dB SL relative to individually determined thresholds for each filter condition and repetition rate. The data support the hypothesis that resolution of pulse-train repetition rate involves both temporal- and frequency-based processes--the latter becoming ineffective when frequency resolution of the ear is insufficient to resolve separate harmonics of the signal. Inter- and intra-individual differences are interpreted as reflecting frequency resolution capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3944337     DOI: 10.1121/1.393762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  Detection and discrimination thresholds for auditory periodicity.

Authors:  I Pollack
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-02

2.  Effect of lowest harmonic rank on fundamental-frequency difference limens varies with fundamental frequency.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The burst gap is a peripheral temporal code for pitch perception that is shared across audition and touch.

Authors:  Deepak Sharma; Kevin K W Ng; Ingvars Birznieks; Richard M Vickery
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Pitch strength decreases as F0 and harmonic resolution increase in complex tones composed exclusively of high harmonics.

Authors:  D Timothy Ives; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Place and Temporal Cues in Cochlear Implant Pitch and Melody Perception.

Authors:  Brett A Swanson; Vijay M R Marimuthu; Robert H Mannell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Temporal Pitch Sensitivity in an Animal Model: Psychophysics and Scalp Recordings : Temporal Pitch Sensitivity in Cat.

Authors:  Matthew L Richardson; François Guérit; Robin Gransier; Jan Wouters; Robert P Carlyon; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.