| Literature DB >> 32331284 |
Lamya H Al-Wahaibi1, Natalia Alvarez2, Olivier Blacque3, Nicolás Veiga2, Aamal A Al-Mutairi4, Ali A El-Emam5.
Abstract
Two new N'-heteroarylidene-1-carbohydrazide derivatives, namely;Entities:
Keywords: DFT; Hirshfeld surface analysis; IR; UV-Vis spectra; adamantane-1-carbohydrazides; antibacterial activity; crystal structure
Year: 2020 PMID: 32331284 PMCID: PMC7221572 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25081934
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthesis of compounds 1 and 2.
Crystal data and structure refinement parameters of compounds 1 and 2.
| Structural Parameters | Compound 1 | Compound 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Empirical formula | C17H23N3O2 | C16H19N3O3S |
| Formula weight | 301.38 | 333.40 |
| Temperature | 160(1) K | 160 (1) K |
| Wavelength | 1.54184 Å | 1.54184 Å |
| Crystal system | Monoclinic | Orthorhombic |
| Space group | I 1 2/a 1 | Pbca |
| Unit cell dimensions | ||
| Volume (Å3) | 3051.72(7) | 3030.74(12) |
|
| 8 | 8 |
| Calculated density (mg/m3) | 1.312 | 1.461 |
| Absorption coefficient (mm−1) | 0.700 | 2.073 |
| 1296 | 1408 | |
| Crystal size (mm3) | 0.13 × 0.04 × 0.02 | 0.12 × 0.065 × 0.015 |
| Theta range for data collection | 4.385 to 74.475° | 4.515 to 74.488° |
| Index ranges | −14 ≤ h ≤ 14, −8 ≤ k ≤ 7, −50 ≤ l ≤ 49 | −8 ≤ h ≤ 7, −14 ≤ k ≤ 14, −47 ≤ l ≤ 48 |
| Reflections collected | 25245 | 13432 |
| Independent reflections | 3122 [ | 3102 [ |
| Completeness | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Max. and min. transmission | 0.985 and 0.929 | 0.973 and 0.846 |
| Data/restraints/parameters | 3122/0/211 | 3102/0/212 |
| Goodness-of-fit on | 1.045 | 1.071 |
| Final | ||
| Largest diff. peak and hole (e.Å−3) | 0.252 and −0.216 | 0.505 and −0.273 |
| CCDC number | 1992005 | 1992009 |
Figure 1ORTEP diagrams at 50% probability for the asymmetric units of 1 (a) and 2 (b) with atom numbering scheme.
Hydrogen bonding geometrical parameters for compounds 1 and 2 (Å, °).
| D-H···A | <(DH···A) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound | ||||
| N(3)-H(3A) | 0.881(17) | 1.959(17) | 2.8345(14) | 172.8(15) |
| O(2)-H(2A) | 0.90(2) | 1.95(2) | 2.8368(14) | 165(2) |
| O(2)-H(2B) | 0.89(3) | 1.93(3) | 2.8118(16) | 172(2) |
| Compound | ||||
| N(3)-H(3) | 0.82(3) | 2.19(3) | 2.881(2) | 142(3) |
Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: 1: #1a x − 1/2, −y + 1, z, #2a –x + 1, y + 1/2, −z + 1/2; 2: #1b –x + 1, y − 1/2, −z + 3/2.
Figure 2Hydrogen bond (blue dashed line) scheme for compound 1. Atom color code: C (grey), H (white), O (red), N (blue), S (yellow).
Figure 3Isodensity (0.0004 e) and Hirshfeld surfaces for compounds 1 (a and b) and 2 (c and d). The electrostatic potential is mapped on the isodensity surfaces from red (−0.03 V) to blue (+0.03 V). Atom color code: C (grey), N (blue), O (red), H (white), S (yellow).
Figure 4View of crystal packing of compound 1 along the crystallographic a axis (a) and compound 2 along the crystallographic b axis (b).
Figure 5Fingerprint 2D plots for 1 (a) and 2 (b). Contact percentage contribution of the studied compounds in the surface (c).
Figure 6Experimental and calculated IR spectra of compounds 1 (a) and 2 (b). Theoretical spectra were determined from the gas-phase optimized geometries at the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level. The assignment of the most important IR bands are depicted.
Figure 7Density functional theory (DFT)-optimized geometries of compounds 1 (a) and 2 (b) at the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory. The corresponding crystal structures are shown superimposed in green. Atom color code: C (grey), H (white), O (red), N (blue), S (yellow).
Figure 8DFT-optimized geometries of 1 (a) and 2 (b). The corresponding crystal structures are shown superimposed in green. Atom color code: C (grey), H (white), O (red), N (blue), S (yellow).
Figure 9UV-vis spectra of a 10 μg/mL methanolic solution of 1 (a) and 2 (b). Experimental and calculated spectra (CAM-B3LYP-SMD/6-311+G(d,p)) are depicted as solid and dashed lines, respectively. For the theoretical spectra, the half-width at half-height is 0.333 eV. In (c) and (d), the molecular orbitals involved in the different electronic transitions and their energies are shown for both systems. The electron density difference maps (EDDM) associated with the electronic transitions are also depicted. The electron density changes from purple to cyan upon light absorption. Atom color code: C (grey), H (white), O (red), N (blue), S (yellow).
In vitro diameter of growth inhibition zones of compounds 1, 2 (200 μg/8 mm disc), the broad-spectrum antibacterial drugs Gentamicin sulfate and Ampicillin trihydrate, and the antifungal drug Clotrimazole (100 μg/8 mm disc) against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6571 (SA), Bacillus subtilis ATCC 5256 (BS), Micrococcus luteus ATCC 27141 (ML), Escherichia coli ATCC 8726 (EC), Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (PA), and the yeast-like pathogenic fungus Candida albicans MTCC 227 (CA).
| Diameter of Growth Inhibition Zone (mm) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Compound | 28 | 26 | 23 | 12 | 14 | 15 |
| Compound | 31 | 32 | 22 | 22 | 19 | 11 |
| Gentamicin sulfate | 27 | 26 | 20 | 22 | 21 | NT |
| Ampicillin trihydrate | 22 | 23 | 20 | 16 | 16 | NT |
| Clotrimazole | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | 21 |
NT: not tested.
The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of compounds 1, 2, the broad-spectrum antibacterial drugs Gentamicin and Ampicillin, and the antifungal drug Clotrimazole against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6571 (SA), Bacillus subtilis ATCC 5256 (BS), Micrococcus luteus ATCC 27141 (ML), Escherichia coli ATCC 8726 (EC), Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (PA), and the yeast-like pathogenic fungus Candida albicans MTCC 227 (CA).
| MIC, µg/mL (µM) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Compound | 1 (3.53) | 1 (3.53) | 2 (7.06) | 64 (225.85) | >64 | 64 (225.85) |
| Compound | 0.5 (1.50) | 0.5 (1.50) | 1 (3.0) | 2 (6.0) | 2 (6.0) | >64 |
| Gentamicin | 1 (2.09) 1 | 2 (4.19) 1 | 2 (4.19) 1 | 0.5 (1.05) 1 | 0.5 (1.05) 1 | NT |
| Ampicillin | 2 (5.72) 2 | 1 (2.86) 2 | 2 (5.72) 2 | 8 (22.90) 2 | 8 (22.90) 2 | NT |
| Clotrimazole | NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | 4 (11.60) |
1 μM values were calculated based on Gentamicin base, 2 μM values were calculated based on anhydrous Ampicillin, NT: not tested.