| Literature DB >> 32325868 |
Minseok Kim1,2, Tansol Park3, Jin Young Jeong1, Youlchang Baek1, Hyun-Jeong Lee4.
Abstract
This study demonstrated the potential effects of the rumen microbiota on the deposition of intramuscular fat, known as marbling. Previous studies on fatty acid metabolism in beef cattle have mostly focused on biohydrogenating rumen bacteria, whereas those on the overall rumen microbiota-to understand their roles in marbling-have not been systematically performed. The rumen microbiota of 14 Korean beef cattle (Hanwoo), which showed similar carcass characteristics and blood metabolites but different marbling scores, were analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The rumen samples were grouped into two extreme marbling score groups of host animals as follows: LMS, marbling score≤ 4 or HMS, marbling score ≥7. Species richness tended to be higher in the HMS group, whereas the overall microbiota differed between LMS and HMS groups. RFP12, Verrucomicrobia, Oscillospira, Porphyromonadaceae, and Paludibacter were differentially abundant in the HMS group, whereas Olsenella was abundant in the LMS group. Some marbling-associated bacterial taxa also contributed to the enrichment of two lipid metabolic pathways including "alpha-linolenic acid metabolism" and "fatty acid biosynthesis" in the HMS microbiome. Taxonomic drivers of fatty acid biosynthesis, particularly in the rumen microbiome of high-marbled meat, could thus be further studied to increase the intramuscular fat content.Entities:
Keywords: Hanwoo; beef cattle; lipid metabolism; marbling; rumen microbiota
Year: 2020 PMID: 32325868 PMCID: PMC7222830 DOI: 10.3390/ani10040712
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Carcass characteristics and blood metabolites of Hanwoo beef cattle between LMS and HMS groups.
| Evaluations | Marbling Score Groups | SEM 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMS 1 | HMS 2 | MS | Diet * | MS × Diet | ||
| Live weight (kg) | 600.29 | 665.86 | 17.26 | 0.2066 | 0.9777 | 0.8048 |
| Carcass weight (kg) | 331.12 | 375.76 | 11.53 | 0.2702 | 0.9761 | 0.9299 |
| Carcass percent (%) | 55.16 | 56.23 | 0.52 | 0.8267 | 0.9032 | 0.3424 |
| Lean meat weight (kg) | 233.50 | 259.92 | 8.03 | 0.3703 | 0.9746 | 0.8277 |
| Fat weight (kg) | 55.99 | 68.94 | 3.13 | 0.1851 | 0.9441 | 0.8723 |
| Bone weight (kg) | 43.74 | 47.79 | 1.14 | 0.2617 | 0.9773 | 0.9273 |
| Backfat thickness (mm) | 10.29 | 9.57 | 0.64 | 0.8693 | 0.6736 | 0.9717 |
| Sirloin area (cm2) | 90.71 | 100.14 | 2.90 | 0.2255 | 0.8071 | 0.2504 |
| Meat yield index | 71.69 | 69.44 | 1.34 | 0.5246 | 0.7485 | 0.5262 |
| Meat color | 4.57 | 4.29 | 0.14 | 0.2969 | 0.1826 | 0.6559 |
| Fat color | 3.14 | 3.29 | 0.11 | 0.5188 | 0.6885 | 0.4281 |
| Marbling score ** | 3.14 B | 7.43 A | 0.62 | <0.0001 | 0.3742 | 0.0618 |
| Sirloin crude fat (%) | 28.84 | 35.07 | 1.69 | 0.2585 | 0.9403 | 0.8442 |
| Renal fat (%) | 16.22 | 14.26 | 1.01 | 0.4523 | 0.9268 | 0.8684 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 120.17 | 127.57 | 8.94 | 0.3508 | 0.0884 | 0.2079 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 22.83 | 21.57 | 2.11 | 0.9478 | 0.9257 | 0.6944 |
| High-density lipoprotein (mg/dL) | 87.00 | 106.86 | 5.70 | 0.1908 | 0.2682 | 0.3136 |
| Low-density lipoprotein (mg/dL) | 30.50 | 33.00 | 2.79 | 0.4966 | 0.2349 | 0.5109 |
| Total Lipid (mg/dL) | 293.83 | 306.43 | 20.75 | 0.3753 | 0.0826 | 0.4457 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 96.67 | 112.57 | 7.50 | 0.7138 | 0.4471 | 0.9402 |
| Insulin (μU/ml) | 13.27 | 6.77 | 2.22 | 0.2038 | 0.8244 | 0.3795 |
1 Low marbling score. 2 High marbling score. 3 Standard error of the mean. * Diet effect was considered based on the four regimens used for feeding during the early weaning period. Control, mother milk + roughage; T1, milk replacement + concentrate; T2, milk replacement + concentrate + roughage; T3, milk replacement + concentrate + 30% starch. ** Determined based on the beef marling standard [31].
Alpha-Diversity measurements of the prokaryotic microbiota in Hanwoo beef cattle.
| Measurements | Marbling Score Groups | SEM 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMS 1 | HMS 2 | |||
| Observed ASVs | 855.57 b | 1039.14 a | 49.74 | 0.0614 |
| Chao1 estimates | 860.06 b | 1045.96 a | 50.39 | 0.0615 |
| Evenness | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.01 | 0.1959 |
| Faith’s Phylogenetic diversity | 64.80 | 62.14 | 3.05 | 0.6818 |
| Shannon’s index | 7.76 | 8.24 | 0.15 | 0.1070 |
| Simpson’s index | 0.984 | 0.989 | 0.002 | 0.2979 |
1 Low marbling score. 2 High marbling score. 3 Standard error of the mean. Good’s coverage was >99.9% in all samples. Statistical difference was declared at p < 0.05 (uppercase superscript), 0.05 < p < 0.1 (lowercase). ASV, amplicon sequencing variant.
Figure 1Principal coordinates analysis based on both unweighted (A) and weighted (B) UniFrac distances of prokaryotic populations in the rumen of Korean beef cattle. PERMANOVA was computed for non-parametric statistical tests between low marbling score (LMS) and high marbling score (HMS) groups.
Figure 2The number of shared and exclusively identified taxa in collapsed (A) phyla, (B) families, and (C) genera BIOM tables between low marbling score (LMS) and high marbling score (HMS) groups.
Figure 3Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe; differentially abundant bacterial taxa defined by LEfSe analysis) computed between low marbling score (LMS) and high marbling score (HMS) groups.
Figure 4Principal components analysis of PICRUSt2 functional prediction retrieved from prokaryotic populations in the rumens of Korean beef cattle. PERMANOVA was computed for non-parametric statistical tests between low marbling score (LMS) and high marbling score (HMS) groups.
Figure 5Characterization of taxonomic drivers of two functional pathways related to lipid metabolism in the rumen of the high marbling score (HMS) group of Korean beef cattle using FishTaco.
Figure 6Correlation coefficient matrix between meat quality measurements and relative abundances of major bacterial genera each found in more than 50% of the 14 rumen samples. Only significant correlations (p < 0.05, |r| > 0.5) are shown. The degree of correlation coefficients are shown using both the color and size of the circles based on the color key on the right side.