Literature DB >> 28235871

Metatranscriptomic Profiling Reveals Linkages between the Active Rumen Microbiome and Feed Efficiency in Beef Cattle.

Fuyong Li1, Le Luo Guan2.   

Abstract

Exploring compositional and functional characteristics of the rumen microbiome can improve the understanding of its role in rumen function and cattle feed efficiency. In this study, we applied metatranscriptomics to characterize the active rumen microbiomes of beef cattle with different feed efficiencies (efficient, n = 10; inefficient, n = 10) using total RNA sequencing. Active bacterial and archaeal compositions were estimated based on 16S rRNAs, and active microbial metabolic functions including carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) were assessed based on mRNAs from the same metatranscriptomic data sets. In total, six bacterial phyla (Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Spirochaetes, Cyanobacteria, and Synergistetes), eight bacterial families (Succinivibrionaceae, Prevotellaceae, Ruminococcaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Veillonellaceae, Spirochaetaceae, Dethiosulfovibrionaceae, and Mogibacteriaceae), four archaeal clades (Methanomassiliicoccales, Methanobrevibacter ruminantium, Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii, and Methanosphaera), 112 metabolic pathways, and 126 CAZymes were identified as core components of the active rumen microbiome. As determined by comparative analysis, three bacterial families (Lachnospiraceae, Lactobacillaceae, and Veillonellaceae) tended to be more abundant in low-feed-efficiency (inefficient) animals (P < 0.10), and one archaeal taxon (Methanomassiliicoccales) tended to be more abundant in high-feed-efficiency (efficient) cattle (P < 0.10). Meanwhile, 32 microbial metabolic pathways and 12 CAZymes were differentially abundant (linear discriminant analysis score of >2 with a P value of <0.05) between two groups. Among them, 30 metabolic pathways and 11 CAZymes were more abundant in the rumen of inefficient cattle, while 2 metabolic pathways and 1 CAZyme were more abundant in efficient animals. These findings suggest that the rumen microbiomes of inefficient cattle have more diverse activities than those of efficient cattle, which may be related to the host feed efficiency variation.IMPORTANCE This study applied total RNA-based metatranscriptomics and showed the linkage between the active rumen microbiome and feed efficiency (residual feed intake) in beef cattle. The data generated from the current study provide fundamental information on active rumen microbiome at both compositional and functional levels, which serve as a foundation to study rumen function and its role in cattle feed efficiency. The findings that the active rumen microbiome may contribute to variations in feed efficiency of beef cattle highlight the possibility of enhancing nutrient utilization and improve cattle feed efficiency through modification of rumen microbial functions.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RNA-seq; beef cattle; feed efficiency; metatranscriptome; rumen microbiome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28235871      PMCID: PMC5394315          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00061-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  72 in total

1.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  SortMeRNA: fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data.

Authors:  Evguenia Kopylova; Laurent Noé; Hélène Touzet
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.

Authors:  Ben Langmead; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Relating the metatranscriptome and metagenome of the human gut.

Authors:  Eric A Franzosa; Xochitl C Morgan; Nicola Segata; Levi Waldron; Joshua Reyes; Ashlee M Earl; Georgia Giannoukos; Matthew R Boylan; Dawn Ciulla; Dirk Gevers; Jacques Izard; Wendy S Garrett; Andrew T Chan; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Fate of supplementary B-vitamins in the gastrointestinal tract of dairy cows.

Authors:  D E Santschi; R Berthiaume; J J Matte; A F Mustafa; C L Girard
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Isolation of Succinivibrionaceae implicated in low methane emissions from Tammar wallabies.

Authors:  P B Pope; W Smith; S E Denman; S G Tringe; K Barry; P Hugenholtz; C S McSweeney; A C McHardy; M Morrison
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR.

Authors:  David M Stevenson; Paul J Weimer
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Effect of source of rumen-degraded protein on production and ruminal metabolism in lactating dairy cows.

Authors:  G A Broderick; S M Reynal
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Composition and similarity of bovine rumen microbiota across individual animals.

Authors:  Elie Jami; Itzhak Mizrahi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation.

Authors:  Nicola Segata; Jacques Izard; Levi Waldron; Dirk Gevers; Larisa Miropolsky; Wendy S Garrett; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  72 in total

1.  RAPID COMMUNICATION: Residual feed intake in beef cattle is associated with differences in protein turnover and nutrient transporters in ruminal epithelium.

Authors:  Ahmed A Elolimy; Emad Abdel-Hamied; Liangyu Hu; Joshua C McCann; Daniel W Shike; Juan J Loor
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Poor feed efficiency in sheep is associated with several structural abnormalities in the community metabolic network of their ruminal microbes.

Authors:  Rocky D Patil; Melinda J Ellison; Sara M Wolff; Courtney Shearer; Anna M Wright; Rebecca R Cockrum; Kathy J Austin; William R Lamberson; Kristi M Cammack; Gavin C Conant
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The impact of feed efficiency selection on the ruminal, cecal, and fecal microbiomes of Angus steers from a commercial feedlot.

Authors:  Christina B Welch; Jeferson M Lourenco; Dylan B Davis; Taylor R Krause; Mia N Carmichael; Michael J Rothrock; T Dean Pringle; Todd R Callaway
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Effect of cattle breed and basal diet on digestibility, rumen bacterial communities, and eating and rumination activity.

Authors:  Pedro H V Carvalho; Ana C J Pinto; Danilo D Millen; Tara L Felix
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Digestive tract microbiota of beef cattle that differed in feed efficiency.

Authors:  Harvey C Freetly; Aaron Dickey; Amanda K Lindholm-Perry; Richard M Thallman; John W Keele; Andrew P Foote; James E Wells
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Assessment of Rumen Microbiota from a Large Dairy Cattle Cohort Reveals the Pan and Core Bacteriomes Contributing to Varied Phenotypes.

Authors:  Mingyuan Xue; Huizeng Sun; Xuehui Wu; Le Luo Guan; Jianxin Liu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Variation in animal performance explained by the rumen microbiome or by diet composition.

Authors:  Claire B Gleason; Robin R White
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Effect of ergot alkaloids and a mycotoxin deactivating product on in vitro ruminal fermentation using the Rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC).

Authors:  Jenna M Sarich; Kim Stanford; Karen S Schwartzkopf-Genswein; Robert J Gruninger; Tim A McAllister; Sarah J Meale; Barry R Blakley; Gregory B Penner; Gabriel O Ribeiro
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.338

9.  Microbiomes attached to fresh perennial ryegrass are temporally resilient and adapt to changing ecological niches.

Authors:  Christopher J Creevey; Alison H Kingston-Smith; Sharon A Huws; Joan E Edwards; Wanchang Lin; Francesco Rubino; Mark Alston; David Swarbreck; Shabhonam Caim; Pauline Rees Stevens; Justin Pachebat; Mi-Young Won; Linda B Oyama
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 14.650

10.  Inter and intraspecies comparison of the level of selected bacterial phyla in in cattle and sheep based on feces.

Authors:  Natalia Szeligowska; Paulina Cholewińska; Katarzyna Czyż; Konrad Wojnarowski; Marzena Janczak
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.