Literature DB >> 26761843

Profile of Hanwoo Steer Carcass Characteristics, Meat Quality and Fatty Acid Composition after Feeding Italian Ryegrass Silage.

Won Ho Kim1, Suk-Nam Kang2, Mariadhas Valan Arasu1, Gyo-Moon Chu3, Da Hye Kim4, Jae-Hong Park5, Young Kyoon Oh6, Ki Choon Choi1.   

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate the growth performance, feed intake, slaughter characteristics, meat quantity and quality characteristics of Hanwoo steers fed with Italian ryegrass (IRG) silage (TRT). IRG silage consisted 11.70% protein, 2.84% ether extract, 53.50% dry matter digestibility and 63.34% total digestible nutrients. The daily weight gain and feed conversion ratio of TRT were significantly (p<0.01) higher than that of control diet (CON; fed rice straw) in the whole periods. However, the slaughter weight, dressing percentage, quantity grade and quantity traits (marbling score, meat color, fat color, and quality grade) of either TRT or CON were similar. Meat fed TRT diet showed higher crude fat and lightness (L*) value and lower moisture content and pH value compared with the CON diet (p<0.05). Overall the carcass yield was 12.5% higher than CON diet.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hanwoo steers; Italian ryegrass silage; carcass characteristics; fatty acid profiles; meat quality

Year:  2015        PMID: 26761843      PMCID: PMC4662352          DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.3.299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour        ISSN: 1225-8563            Impact factor:   2.622


Introduction

It is widely recognized that diet plays a major role in modulating the fatty acid composition of cattle (Jensen, 2002), goats (Chilliard ) and sheep (Bocquier and Caja, 2001). However, feed costs represent the largest single variable cost in beef production in Korea. Contributing to this situation is high operating costs, where the feed component is the major cost of total cost. The grass is the cheapest source of feed available for beef (and milk) production, which provided that the environment and management permit high yields of high-quality herbage to be utilized (McGee, 2005). Production and efficient utilization of high yields of high nutritive value grass throughout an extended grazing season are critical for cost efficient beef production (O’Riordan ). Production of beef cattle fed with grass silage diet supplements containing a high source of protein have been evaluated (Keating ; Petit ; Steen, 1984; Veira ). Grass-feed based production systems are low-input methods that are particularly suitable to meet the demand of meat retailers and consumers for the naturalist and animal-friendly production of beef (Razminowicz ). Therefore, in Korea, the combination of roughage and concentration commonly available in the market is used to rear Hanwoo. Especially, the study of manufacturing silage using whole crop barley silage or whole crop rye silage was carried out to expand the usage of roughage (Shinekhuu ). Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.; IRG) is an important crop cultivated for the production of highquality forage in temperate regions around the world for various purposes. It is a preferred forage crop due to its fast growth, palatability, high forage yield and good nutritional quality. It is utilised as green forage or silage. Fresh as well as dry matter (DM) yield and nutritional quality of IRG vary considerably with varieties, the stages at which harvested, climatic conditions and agronomic factors. However, the benefits of feeding diet combinations of concentrate and IRG silages from growing period to finishing period of Hanwoo steer have not been evaluated. In order to determine the efficacy of the IRG silage/concentrate feeding system for Hanwoo steer, it was essential to conduct feeding trials to evaluate the IRG silage combined with concentrate system and compare to a traditional rice straw combined with concentrate based system. The objectives of this study were to compare the growth performance, and carcass quality of Hanwoo steer fed IRG silage/concentrate and rice straw/concentrate diet, and meat quantity and quality characteristics.

Materials and Methods

Experimental design and animal management

This experiment was conducted according to the Hanwoo care and user guidelines of the National Livestock Research Institute of Korea. The calves of Hanwoo steers were obtained upon weaning (body weight of 190.00±26.64 kg and from 120 to 180 d of age) and maintained in the individual feeding barn of the National Institute of Animal Science in Korea and cared according to the Hanwoo guidelines of the National Livestock Research Institute of Korea (MFAFF, 2007). Hanwoo steers (4-6 mon age) were individually penned and fed the experimental diets twice daily at 09:00 AM and 16:00 PM and had free access to mineral blocks. Each treatment was fed to steers via an individual gate feeding system. Twenty-four Hanwoo steer were used in this experiment that lasted for 739 d (August 2008-September, 2010). Hanwoo steers were randomly allotted to two treatments (three pens per treatment, four Hanwoo steers per pen) and then investigated by stage of each period. Average body weight ± SD at the start of the experiment was 212.40 kg for the control and 167.60 kg for the treatment, respectively. Animals were fed in a semi-covered barn with two pens per treatment. Animals had ad libitum access to fresh water. At the end of the feeding trial, all animals were slaughtered at a commercial abattoir (National Agricultural Cooperative Federation, Korea). The rice straw was purchased from a beef cattle farm and chopped to 4-5 cm lengths. The IRG was grown on a research farm at National Livestock Research Institute of Korea, harvested at heading stage and packed with Lactobacillus plantarum in round bale wrapper using the silage wrapping machine, and IRG silage was stored for 90 d. Ingredient composition and chemical analysis of the concentrate diets were showed in Table 1.
Table 1.

Ingredient composition and chemical analysis of the experimental diets

Growing periodEarly fattening periodMiddle fattening periodLate fatting period
Cornflake25.0029.0030.0035.00
Barley---8.00
Cottonseed whole---3.00
Wheat18.0018.0018.0018.00
Gluten feed8.009.5812.003.00
Rice bran polished-1.002.361.93
Tapioca residue4.586.225.235.23
Wheat bran11.7912.4013.816.34
Palm kernal meal8.005.003.002.05
Coconut oil meal3.002.001.001.00
Rapseed meal5.003.003.002.00
Soybean meal7.393.280.942.12
Distillers dried grains2.223.504.005.71
Limestone2.172.311.751.64
Molasses3.003.003.003.00
Salt0.810.810.690.69
Probiotics0.050.100.100.10
Magnesium oxide0.300.300.300.30
Sodium bicarbonate0.300.300.500.50
Mineral premixa0.210.210.210.21
Vitamin premixb0.18-0.100.18
Total100.00100.00100.00100.00
Dry matter (%)87.7187.3287.2187.06
Crude protein (% of DM)16.0014.0013.7212.39
Acid detergent fiber (% of DM)9.3710.058.148.16
Neutral detergent fiber (% of DM)26.2826.0624.4322.67
TDN70.1772.0773.3075.00

aSteers had free access to mineral blocks (Rincal block, Daehan New Pham, Korea; provided following nutrients per kg: I, 150 mg; Mn, 200 mg; S, 4,000 mg; Co, 100 mg; Fe, 2,000 mg; Zn, 100 mg; Ni, 50 mg; Cu, 100 mg; Mg, 3,000 mg; Ca, 2,000 mg; Se, 40 μg; NaCl, 380 g) throughout the experiment.

bProvided following nutrients per kg of additive (Grobic-DC, Bayer HealthCare, Germany): Vitamin A, 2,650,000 IU; Vitamin D3, 530,000 IU; Vitamin E, 1,050 IU; Niacin, 10,000 mg; Mn, 4,400 mg; Zn, 4,400 mg; Fe, 13,200 mg; Cu, 2,200 mg; I, 440 mg; Co, 440 mg.

aSteers had free access to mineral blocks (Rincal block, Daehan New Pham, Korea; provided following nutrients per kg: I, 150 mg; Mn, 200 mg; S, 4,000 mg; Co, 100 mg; Fe, 2,000 mg; Zn, 100 mg; Ni, 50 mg; Cu, 100 mg; Mg, 3,000 mg; Ca, 2,000 mg; Se, 40 μg; NaCl, 380 g) throughout the experiment. bProvided following nutrients per kg of additive (Grobic-DC, Bayer HealthCare, Germany): Vitamin A, 2,650,000 IU; Vitamin D3, 530,000 IU; Vitamin E, 1,050 IU; Niacin, 10,000 mg; Mn, 4,400 mg; Zn, 4,400 mg; Fe, 13,200 mg; Cu, 2,200 mg; I, 440 mg; Co, 440 mg. Lactobacillus plantarum strain procured from Chung-Mi Bio Co., Korea was used for the preparation of silage. All animals were also fed concentrate diets for each growing period. After feeding the roughage or silage, the concentrate was offered each feeding time. The leftover feed is collected every day just before the evening feeding time (17:00) to measure the feed intake. The classification of growing period was divided into initial period for 137 d, first fattening period for 124 d, mid fattening period for 184 days, finish fattening period for 295 d, and a final period of 739 d, respectively, from the beginning of feeding period. Random grab samples of rice straw and IRG silage were taken monthly and were ground through a 1 mm screen for the proximal analysis by the method of AOAC (1995). The chemical composition of rice straw or IRG silage was analyzed.

Chemical composition analyses

The dry matter content of the rice straw and IRG silages were determined by freeze-drying for at least 24 h. Crude ash was obtained at 550℃ for 5 h. The crude protein, ether extract, and crude ash were determined by AOAC (1995). Digestible energy values were calculated from the total digestible nutrients (TDN) using the factors suggested by the NRC (2001), and the data were subjected to analysis of variance (Snedecor and Cochran, 1968).

Measurements and analyses

All the steers were slaughtered for the examination of carcass characteristics. Samples of intramuscular (M. longissimusdorsi) (LM) at the 13-14th ribs were taken and ground, and mixed well for fatty acids analysis. Carcasses were weighed immediately post the slaughter process, and then chilled at 4℃ for 48 h. The day after slaughtering, the left side of the carcass was ribbed between the last rib and the first lumbar vertebrae to evaluate carcass traits. After 30 min of blooming period, evaluation was performed for quantity grade (5 = grade A to 2 = grade D), marbling score (1 = low fat to 5 = high fat), meat color (1 = very light cherry red to 7 = very dark red), fat color (1 = white to 7 = yellow), texture (1 = very fine to 3 = very coarse), maturity (1 = below 15 mon old to 15- 26 mon old = 2), and quality grade (7 = grade 1+ to grade 3 = 1) on the basis of Animal Products Grading Service (APGS) manual (2007). Briefly, back fat thickness was determined by measuring, perpendicular to the outside surface, at a point two-thirds of the length of the rib-eye ribbed between the last rib and the first lumbar vertebrae. The area of the rib-eye was determined at the surface of the cut using a standard grid. Ten grams of chopped meat was mixed with 10 mL deionized water. The pH of the slurry was measured using the pH meter (F-12, Horiba, Japan). The cooking loss was performed as described by Kang . The sample of cooking loss was then used for the shear force assessment. The sample was cut into 1 cm2 cross section with the fiber direction and 1.5 cm in length. The shear force was measured using a texture analyzer (TA-XT2i, Stable Microsystems Ltd., UK) equipped with a 25 kg load cell, a Warner-Bratzler shear blade, and a test speed setting at 2.0 mm/s. Only the maximum force (kg) was taken into account. Part of meat samples were cut into pieces of 2 cm in width, 4 cm in length and 0.5 cm in thickness. In addition, they were roasted using the electronic pan for home use until the internal temperature of 73℃ was attained.

Fatty acid analysis

The total contents of lipids were extracted from the ground LM. Tissues were homogenized in chloroform/methanol solution (Folch ) using a homogeizer (PT-MR3100, Switzerland). The chloroform recovered from the measured aliquots of the extract was evaporated in the dry bath (Type 16500, USA) at 50℃ using nitrogen gas. Methylation of the lipids extracted followed the method of Lepage and Roy (1986) prior to injecting into a gas chromatograph (HP 5890 II fixed with a G1513A autosampler, Hewlett-Packard Co.). A fused silica capillary column (100 m × 0.25 mm, i.d. × 0.20 μm thickness, Supelco, SP TM-2560, USA) was used for the fatty acid analyses and ultra-pure helium was used as the carrier gas (flower rate = 1.0 mL/min). The injector and detector temperature was maintained at 250℃. The initial oven temperature was 140℃ (held for 30 min), and then increased by 15℃/min to 220℃ (held for 40 min).

Statistical analysis

Samples were analyzed in triplicate, and the data were presented as mean ± standard error of the means. The pen was considered as the experimental unit. An analysis of variance was performed on all the variables measured using the general linear model procedure of the SAS statistical package (Statistics Analytical System, USA, 2002). The Duncan’s multiple range tests were used to determine differences between treatment means.

Results and Discussion

Performance and characteristics

The nutrient composition of rice straw and IRG silage are shown in Table 2. Results revealed that the percent of crude protein in IRG silage was significantly higher (11.70%). The other components of IRG silage such as ether extract (2.84%), in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) (53.50%), total digestible nutrient (TDN) (63.34%), lower dry matter (68.04%), crude ash (12.70%) and neutral detergent fiber (55.32%) were comparatively higher than those of rice straw (p<0.05). The chemical compositions of the silages used are typical of well-preserved, lactate silages (McDonald and Edwards, 1976). The nutrition value of IRG silage in this study was similar to the silage of barley and ryegrass (Kim ; McIsacc and Lovering, 1982). Kunelius and Narasimhalu (1983) and Narasimhalu also reported that ryegrass harvested annually showed high crude protein (160-190 g kg−1 DM) that results in high quality of forage for ruminants. In this study, Hanwoo steers were fed a diet consisting of 2.41 kg DM rice straw and 7.41 kg DM concentrate for the control group and 4.00 kg DM IRG silage and 6.20 concentrate on treatment group per a day, respectively (See Materials and methods). Tables 3 and 4 show the effects of feeding IRG silage/concentrate diet on growth performance and feed intake of Hanwoo steers while growing, first, middle and finish fattening period. The effects of feeding IRG silage/concentrate on growth performance and feed intake of Hanwoo steers during the whole period are shown in Table 5. In the middle fattening period, the final body weight of the group fed IGR silage/concentrate diet (Treatment) (554.90 kg) were significantly higher than those of the control group (CON), although the initial body weight of CON and IRG groups were 212.40 and 167.60 kg respectively. However, the final body weight of Hanwoo steers fed either IRG silage/concentrate or rice straw/concentrate diet in the growing, first and finish fattening periods were similar. The daily weight gain of steer fed treatment diet was significantly higher than that of CON diet during the period of growing and middle fattening (p<0.05), whereas no significant difference was found in the period of middle and finish fattening period (p>0.05). As a whole, the daily weight gain of treatment was significantly (p<0.01) higher than that of CON (Table 5). The daily weight gain of treatment was higher 57.54%, 31.82%, 18.04%, and 5.10% compared with CON in the growing, first fattening, middle fattening and finish the fattening period, respectively. This result indicated that the increase in daily weight gain of the growing period was relatively higher than those of other periods (p<0.05). In addition, we could suggest that the whole period of the daily weight gain was mainly affected by the growing and middle fattening period in Hanwoo steer (Tables 3 and 4). The total feed intake of treatment was higher (p<0.01) than that of CON in the growing period, but no significant difference was found in the other periods, which may affect the whole period of total feed intake. During the feed intake of concentrate, treatment was higher than CON in the first or middle fattening period (p<0.01). Therefore, the feed intake of concentrate on treatment showed significantly (p<0.01) higher than that of CON in the whole period. However, in the growing period and final fattening period, there were no significant differences between CON and treatment of the feed intake of concentrate. These results are in agreement with the results of Christensen and Cho who reported that the total feed intake was increased and concentrate feed intake was decreased in the group fed barley silage compared with roughage feeding system in cows. No significant differences were observed in feed efficiency and feed conversion ratio between T and CON groups in each period of Hanwoo steer (p>0.05). Thomas and Baker et al. (1992) reported that diets containing a high proportion of grass silage have sustained lower growth rates and resulted in a greater fat deposition in the grain-fed beef when cattle were given high-concentrate diets in the forms of similar amount of energy and protein. However, the feed conversion ratio of treatment was significantly (p<0.05) higher than CON in the whole period.
Table 2.

Nutrient composition of rice straw and Italian ryegrass (IRG) silage (%)

Rice strawIRG silageSEM1Pr > F2
Dry matter (DM)90.0168.044.560.01
Crude protein (CP)3.6211.701.010.01
Ether extract (EE)1.902.840.320.01
Crude ash (CA)32.4112.701.220.01
Neutral detergent fiber (NDF)80.0255.322.580.01
Acid detergent fiber (ADF)53.1432.703.600.01
In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD)51.6353.500.820.05
Total digestible nutrient (TDN)47.0363.342.460.01

1Standard error of the mean. 2 Probability levels.

Table 3.

Effects of feeding IRG silage/concentrate on growth performance and feed intake of Hanwoo steers during growing and first fattening period

ItemsGrowing periodEarly fattening period

CON1T2SEM3Pr > F4CONTSEMPr > F
Initial body weight (kg)212.40167.604.380.00305.90314.9013.370.64
Final body weight (kg)305.90314.9013.370.64376.30407.7014.850.15
Daily weight gain (kg)50.681.080.120.030.570.750.070.09
Feed intake (kg)66.618.500.300.0111.5912.470.320.13
Concentrate (kg)73.683.220.160.117.094.930.150.00
Rice straw (kg)82.930.00--4.500.00--
IRG silage (kg)90.005.28--0.007.54--
Feed efficiency0.100.130.020.310.050.060.010.19
Feed conversion ration13.478.982.180.1621.0418.581.450.25

1CON: Rice straw+concentrate, 2T: Italian ryegrass silage+concentrate. 3Standard error of the mean. 4Probability levels. 5Total weight gain and daily weight gain calculated for each animal per a day that it received the test diets. 6-9Feed intake, concentrate, and rice straw/IRG silage calculated for each animal for each period that it received the test diets (kg/head/day, DM basis).

Table 4.

Effects of feeding IRG silage/concentrate on growth performance and feed intake of Hanwoo steers during middle fattening and finish fattening period

ItemsMiddle fattening periodLate fatting period

CON1T2SEM3Pr > F4CONTSEMPr > F
Initial body weight (kg)376.30407.7014.850.15501.00554.9017.250.04
Final body weight (kg)501.00554.9017.250.04676.10735.4023.460.09
Daily weight gain (kg)50.680.800.050.080.590.610.030.72
Feed intake (kg)611.4011.430.490.969.579.240.210.33
Concentrate (kg)78.666.960.210.008.497.630.230.06
Rice straw (kg)82.930.00--0.001.60--
IRG silage (kg)90.004.48--1.080.00--
Feed efficiency0.060.070.000.160.060.070.000.36
Feed conversion ration17.3614.800.970.0816.2815.890.990.78

1CON: Rice straw+concentrate, 2T: Italian ryegrass silage+concentrate. 3Standard error of the mean. 4Probability levels. 5Total weight gain and daily weight gain calculated for each animal per a day that it received the test diets. 6-9Feed intake, concentrate and rice straw/IRG silage calculated for each animal for each period that it received the test diets (kg/head/day, DM basis).

Table 5.

Effects of feeding IRG silage/concentrate on growth performance and feed intake of Hanwoo steers during whole period

ItemsWhole period
CON1T2SEM3Pr > F4
Daily weight gain (kg)50.630.770.0340.01
Feed intake (kg)69.8310.200.110.08
Concentrate (kg)77.426.200.090.00
Rice straw (kg)82.410.00--
IRG silage (kg)90.004.00--
Feed efficiency0.060.080.000.07
Feed conversion ration16.2213.440.780.02

1CON: Rice straw+concentrate, 2T: Italian ryegrass silage+concentrate. 3Standard error of the mean. 4Probability levels. 5Total weight gain and daily weight gain calculated for each animal per a day that it received the test diets. 6-9Feed intake, concentrate and rice straw/IRG silage calculated for each animal for each period that it received the test diets (kg/head/day, DM basis).

1Standard error of the mean. 2 Probability levels. 1CON: Rice straw+concentrate, 2T: Italian ryegrass silage+concentrate. 3Standard error of the mean. 4Probability levels. 5Total weight gain and daily weight gain calculated for each animal per a day that it received the test diets. 6-9Feed intake, concentrate, and rice straw/IRG silage calculated for each animal for each period that it received the test diets (kg/head/day, DM basis). 1CON: Rice straw+concentrate, 2T: Italian ryegrass silage+concentrate. 3Standard error of the mean. 4Probability levels. 5Total weight gain and daily weight gain calculated for each animal per a day that it received the test diets. 6-9Feed intake, concentrate and rice straw/IRG silage calculated for each animal for each period that it received the test diets (kg/head/day, DM basis). 1CON: Rice straw+concentrate, 2T: Italian ryegrass silage+concentrate. 3Standard error of the mean. 4Probability levels. 5Total weight gain and daily weight gain calculated for each animal per a day that it received the test diets. 6-9Feed intake, concentrate and rice straw/IRG silage calculated for each animal for each period that it received the test diets (kg/head/day, DM basis).

Carcass characteristics

The effect of IRG silage/concentrate on carcass yield and quality traits of Hanwoo steer is shown in Table 6A. The carcass fed IRG silage/concentrated diet significantly increased back-fat thickness and rib-eye area of Hanwoo steers comparing with the CON diet (p<0.05). However, slaughter weight, dressing percentage, quantity grade and quality traits (marbling score, meat color, fat color, texture, matures, and quality grade) of carcass from Hanwoo steers fed either IRG silage/concentrate or rice straw/concentrate diet were similar. These results are in agreement with the results of Kim et al. (2003) who reported that feeding silage affected the back-fat thickness and rib-eye area in steers. Previous research (Steen, 1995) has reported similar findings but have also reported that the carcass weight of steer significantly reduced when concentrate intake reduced, which is in disagreement with our data.
Table 6A.

Effects of feeding IRG silage/concentrate on carcass yield and quality traits of Hanwoo steer

CON1T2SEM3Pr > F4
Carcass yield traits
Back fat thickness (cm)10.5014.501.230.03
Rib-eye area (cm2)83.0091.102.540.04
Slaughter weight (kg)400.60429.1011.750.10
Dressing percent (%)65.9363.890.820.10
Quantity grade54.203.900.190.28
Quality traits
Marbling score64.304.600.740.78
Meat color74.805.000.210.50
Fat color82.903.000.070.33
Texture91.601.500.160.67
Mature102.001.500.240.16
Quality grade113.904.800.370.10
Total Price (₩)6,099,1116,860,567337,7260.15

1CON: Hanwoo steer fed rice straw+concentrate. 2T: Hanwoo steer fed Italian ryegrass silage+concentrate. 3Standard error of the mean. 4Probability levels. 5grade A (5 point) ~ grade D (2 point). 6low fat (1 point) ~ high fat (5 point). 7very light cherry red (1 point) ~ very dark red (7 point). 8white (1 point) ~ yellow (7 point). 9very fine (1 point) ~ very coarse (3 point). 10below 15 month old (1 point) ~ from 15 to 26 month old (2 point). 11grade 1+ (7 point) ~ grade 3 (1 point).

1CON: Hanwoo steer fed rice straw+concentrate. 2T: Hanwoo steer fed Italian ryegrass silage+concentrate. 3Standard error of the mean. 4Probability levels. 5grade A (5 point) ~ grade D (2 point). 6low fat (1 point) ~ high fat (5 point). 7very light cherry red (1 point) ~ very dark red (7 point). 8white (1 point) ~ yellow (7 point). 9very fine (1 point) ~ very coarse (3 point). 10below 15 month old (1 point) ~ from 15 to 26 month old (2 point). 11grade 1+ (7 point) ~ grade 3 (1 point).

Meat characteristics

Table 6B shows that the chemical composition and meat qualities of M. longissimusdorsi (LM) of Hanwoo steer fed IRG silage/concentrate. LM from IRG silage/concentrate diet based production systems resulted in lighter (L*) carcasses with higher fat and lower moisture compared to the LM from rice straw/concentrate diet (p<0.05). Similar to the present study, Duckett found that intramuscular fat content and palatability can be increased by switching from a forage diet to a high concentrate diet 84-196 d prior to slaughter. Furthermore, Schnell and French have reported that cattle finished on forage have subcutaneous fat that is more yellow in color compared to cattle finished on grain, which may be a disadvantage for consumer acceptance of forage finished beef. However, the crude protein and ash compositions of meat composition and redness (a*) and yellowness (b*) values of meat surface color between test diets were similar. Vestergaard mentioned that postmortem glycogen is converted to lactate and H+ resulting in a decrease in pH of the meat, and the glycogen level at slaughter is inversely related to the ultimate pH. Monin and Sellier (1985) suggested that a high energy diet increased capacity for postmortem glycolysis, which would lead to an extended pH decline and lower ultimate pH. However, in this study, the LM from IRG silage/concentrate diet had significantly (p<0.05) higher pH value than the LM from rice straw/concentrate diet (CON). 1CON: Hanwoo steer fed rice straw+concentrate, 2T: Hanwoo steer fed Italian ryegrass silage+concentrate. 3Standard error of the mean. 4 Probability levels. The fatty acid compositions of LM from Hanwoo steer fed IRG silage/concentrate diet is shown in Table 6C. The fatty acid composition of meat (muscle and adipose tissue) is important for two main reasons: it determines nutritional value and it affects various aspects of meat quality, including shelf life and flavour (Wood ). Previous research (Melton ; Scollan ) has reported similar findings like forage-based beef had higher concentrations of n3 PUFA than concentrate-based beef. However, our results were in disagreement with those studies. No significant differences were found in fatty acid compositions between tested groups (p>0.05). The overall results showed that feeding IRG silage had significant increase crude fat and lightness (L*) and decrease pH and moisture of Hanwoo beef, and the increase of rib-eye area, back fat thickness and slaughter weight of the carcass trait. In addition, feeding IRG silage to Hanwoo steer showed 12.5% higher yield than CON diet in an economic perspective. 1CON: Hanwoo steer fed rice straw+concentrate, 2T: Hanwoo steer fed Italian ryegrass silage+concentrate. 3 Standard error of the mean. 4 Probability levels. EFA=Essential fatty acid. SFA=Saturated fatty acid. USFA=Unsaturated fatty acid. MUFA=monounsaturated fatty acid. PUFA=Polyunsaturated fatty acid.
Table 6B.

Chemical composition and meat qualities of M. longissimus dorsi from Hanwoo steer fed IRG silage/concentrate

CON1T2SEM3Pr > F4
Chemical composition
Moisture68.1763.421.220.03
Crude fat11.3317.141.190.01
Crude protein19.9520.420.730.67
Ash0.860.910.020.06
Meat qualities
Cooking loss (%)24.1023.591.020.14
Shear force (kg)3.823.570.110.21
Water holding capacity55.6855.051.080.64
pH5.645.540.010.05
Surface Color
L*38.6441.900.120.00
a*23.2923.430.240.78
b*10.9411.970.130.52

1CON: Hanwoo steer fed rice straw+concentrate, 2T: Hanwoo steer fed Italian ryegrass silage+concentrate. 3Standard error of the mean. 4 Probability levels.

Table 6C.

Fatty acid contents in the M. longissimus dorsi of Hanwoo steer fed IRG silage/concentrate

CON1T2SEM3Pr > F4
Myristic3.623.180.280.30
Palmitic27.6927.071.040.69
Palmitoleic5.124.450.410.29
Stearic11.6411.740.440.87
Oleic48.8750.081.170.49
Vaccenic0.170.590.250.28
Linoleic1.741.820.140.72
Y-linolenic0.080.090.010.46
Linolenic0.200.230.030.46
Eicosenoic0.480.580.040.10
Arahidonic0.200.160.030.43
EFA51.2652.981.220.35
SFA42.9541.991.080.55
USFA56.8658.011.050.46
MSFA54.6455.701.020.48
PUFA2.222.310.190.75
N-30.200.230.030.46
N-62.022.080.170.82

1CON: Hanwoo steer fed rice straw+concentrate, 2T: Hanwoo steer fed Italian ryegrass silage+concentrate. 3 Standard error of the mean. 4 Probability levels. EFA=Essential fatty acid. SFA=Saturated fatty acid. USFA=Unsaturated fatty acid. MUFA=monounsaturated fatty acid. PUFA=Polyunsaturated fatty acid.

  15 in total

1.  Pork of low technological quality with a normal rate of muscle pH fall in the immediate post-mortem period: The case of the Hampshire breed.

Authors:  G Monin; P Sellier
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  The eating quality of meat of steers fed grass and/or concentrates.

Authors:  P French; E G O'Riordan; F J Monahan; P J Caffrey; M T Mooney; D J Troy; A P Moloney
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Quality of retail beef from two grass-based production systems in comparison with conventional beef.

Authors:  R H Razminowicz; M Kreuzer; M R L Scheeder
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: a review.

Authors:  J D Wood; R I Richardson; G R Nute; A V Fisher; M M Campo; E Kasapidou; P R Sheard; M Enser
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  The influence of conservation methods on digestion and utilization of forages by ruminants.

Authors:  P McDonald; R A Edwards
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 6.297

Review 6.  The composition of bovine milk lipids: January 1995 to December 2000.

Authors:  Robert G Jensen
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  The effect of date of cut and barley substitution on gain and on the efficiency of utilization of grass silage by growing cattle. 1. Gains in live weight and its components.

Authors:  C Thomas; B G Gibbs; D E Beever; B R Thurnham
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.718

8.  Growth and carcass characteristics of beef steers fed silage and different levels of energy with or without protein supplementation.

Authors:  H V Petit; D M Veira; Y Yu
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Manipulating the fatty acid composition of muscle and adipose tissue in beef cattle.

Authors:  N D Scollan; N J Choi; E Kurt; A V Fisher; M Enser; J D Wood
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.718

10.  Effects of time on feed on beef nutrient composition.

Authors:  S K Duckett; D G Wagner; L D Yates; H G Dolezal; S G May
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  4 in total

1.  Association between Rumen Microbiota and Marbling Score in Korean Native Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Minseok Kim; Tansol Park; Jin Young Jeong; Youlchang Baek; Hyun-Jeong Lee
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 2.  The Effects of Total Mixed Ration Feeding with High Roughage Content on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, and Meat Quality of Hanwoo Steers.

Authors:  Min Jung Ku; Lovelia Mamuad; Ki Chang Nam; Yong Il Cho; Seon Ho Kim; Young Sun Choi; Sang Suk Lee
Journal:  Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2021-01-01

3.  Marbling and Its Nutritional Impact on Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Stephen B Smith
Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Effects of using different roughages in the total mixed ration inoculated with or without coculture of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bacillus subtilis on in vitro rumen fermentation and microbial population.

Authors:  Michelle Miguel; Lovelia Mamuad; Sonny Ramos; Min Jung Ku; Chang Dae Jeong; Seon Ho Kim; Yong Il Cho; Sang Suk Lee
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2020-08-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.