Literature DB >> 21094763

Host specificity of the ruminal bacterial community in the dairy cow following near-total exchange of ruminal contents.

P J Weimer1, D M Stevenson, H C Mantovani, S L C Man.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the stability and host specificity of a cow's ruminal bacterial community following massive challenge with ruminal microflora from another cow. In each of 2 experiments, 1 pair of cows was selected on the basis of differences in ruminal bacterial community composition (BCC), determined by automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA), a culture-independent "community fingerprinting" technique. Each pair of cows was then subjected to a 1-time exchange of >95% of ruminal contents without changing the composition of a corn silage/alfalfa haylage-based TMR. In experiment 1, the 2 cows differed (P<0.01) in prefeed ruminal pH (mean = 6.88 vs. 6.14) and prefeed total VFA concentration (mean = 57 vs. 77 mM), averaged over 3 d. Following exchange of ruminal contents, ruminal pH and total VFA concentration in both cows returned to their preexchange values within 24h. Ruminal BCC also returned to near its original profile, but this change required 14 d for 1 cow and 61 d for the other cow. In experiment 2, the 2 other cows differed in prefeed ruminal pH (mean = 6.69 vs. 6.20) and total VFA concentration (mean = 101 vs. 136 mM). Following exchange of ruminal contents, the first cow returned to its preexchange pH and VFA values within 24h; the second cow's rumen rapidly stabilized to a higher prefeed pH (mean = 6.47) and lower prefeed VFA concentration (mean = 120 mM) that was retained over the 62-d test period. Both cows reached somewhat different BCC than before the exchange. However, the BCC of both cows remained distinct and were ultimately more similar to that of the preexchange BCC than of the donor animal BCC. The data indicate that the host animal can quickly reestablish its characteristic ruminal pH and VFA concentration despite dramatic perturbation of its ruminal microbial community. The data also suggest that ruminal BCC displays substantial host specificity that can reestablish itself with varying success when challenged with a microbial community optimally adapted to ruminal conditions of a different host animal.
Copyright © 2010 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21094763     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  74 in total

1.  Validating the Use of Bovine Buccal Sampling as a Proxy for the Rumen Microbiota by Using a Time Course and Random Forest Classification Approach.

Authors:  Juliana Young; Joseph H Skarlupka; Madison S Cox; Rafael Tassinari Resende; Amelie Fischer; Kenneth F Kalscheur; Jennifer C McClure; John B Cole; Garret Suen; Derek M Bickhart
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Changes in the Rumen Microbiota of Cows in Response to Dietary Supplementation with Nitrate, Linseed, and Saponin Alone or in Combination.

Authors:  Milka Popova; Jessie Guyader; Mathieu Silberberg; Ahmad Reza Seradj; Cristina Saro; Aurélien Bernard; Christine Gérard; Cécile Martin; Diego P Morgavi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Engineering the microbiome for animal health and conservation.

Authors:  Se Jin Song; Douglas C Woodhams; Cameron Martino; Celeste Allaband; Andre Mu; Sandrine Javorschi-Miller-Montgomery; Jan S Suchodolski; Rob Knight
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-02-18

4.  Methanogen colonisation does not significantly alter acetogen diversity in lambs isolated 17 h after birth and raised aseptically.

Authors:  Emma J Gagen; Pascale Mosoni; Stuart E Denman; Rafat Al Jassim; Christopher S McSweeney; Evelyne Forano
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Comparisons of bacterial and archaeal communities in the rumen and a dual-flow continuous culture fermentation system using amplicon sequencing.

Authors:  I J Salfer; C Staley; H E Johnson; M J Sadowsky; M D Stern
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  RUMINANT NUTRITION SYMPOSIUM: Tiny but mighty: the role of the rumen microbes in livestock production.

Authors:  Kristi M Cammack; Kathleen J Austin; William R Lamberson; Gavin C Conant; Hannah C Cunningham
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  The players may change but the game remains: network analyses of ruminal microbiomes suggest taxonomic differences mask functional similarity.

Authors:  Tasia M Taxis; Sara Wolff; Sarah J Gregg; Nicholas O Minton; Chiqian Zhang; Jingjing Dai; Robert D Schnabel; Jeremy F Taylor; Monty S Kerley; J Chris Pires; William R Lamberson; Gavin C Conant
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Inhibition of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes by select phytochemicals.

Authors:  Jourdan E Lakes; Christopher I Richards; Michael D Flythe
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.331

9.  Effect of progressive inoculation of fauna-free sheep with holotrich protozoa and total-fauna on rumen fermentation, microbial diversity and methane emissions.

Authors:  Alejandro Belanche; Gabriel de la Fuente; Charles J Newbold
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 4.194

10.  Adaptation and withdrawal of feeding dried Aspergillus oryzae fermentation product to dairy cattle and goats on in vitro NDF digestibility of selected forage sources.

Authors:  Ursula C Hymes-Fecht; David P Casper
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.