| Literature DB >> 32190646 |
Lin Yang1, Chao Zhang2, Wenbo Liu3, Hang Wang1, Junying Xia4, Benyuan Liu4, Xuetao Shi4, Xiuzhen Dong4, Feng Fu4, Meng Dai4.
Abstract
Hemothorax is a serious medical condition that can be life-threatening if left untreated. Early diagnosis and timely treatment are of great importance to produce favorable outcome. Although currently available diagnostic techniques, e.g., chest radiography, ultrasonography, and CT, can accurately detect hemothorax, delayed hemothorax cannot be identified early because these examinations are often performed on patients until noticeable symptoms manifest. Therefore, for early detection of delayed hemothorax, real-time monitoring by means of a portable and noninvasive imaging technique is needed. In this study, we employed electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to detect the onset of hemothorax in real time on eight piglet hemothorax models. The models were established by injection of 60 ml fresh autologous blood into the pleural cavity, and the subsequent development of hemothorax was monitored continuously. The results showed that EIT was able to sensitively detect hemothorax as small as 10 ml in volume, as well as its location. Also, the development of hemothorax over a range of 10 ml up to 60 ml was well monitored in real time, with a favorable linear relationship between the impedance change in EIT images and the volume of blood injected. These findings demonstrated that EIT has a unique potential for early diagnosis and continuous monitoring of hemothorax in clinical practice, providing medical staff valuable information for prompt identification and treatment of delayed hemothorax.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32190646 PMCID: PMC7064861 DOI: 10.1155/2020/1357160
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Puncture point in the establishment of the hemothorax model. (a) Schematic diagram (indices 1-16 represent EIT electrodes 1-16). (b) Experimental photo.
Figure 2EIT electrode application. (a) Electrode placement. (b) Electrode consolidation using a self-adhesive bandage.
Figure 3View of EIT monitoring of simulated pulmonary hemothorax on a piglet.
Figure 4The established hemothorax model. (a) Incision line to expose the pleural cavity. (b) Anatomical structure of the hemothorax model.
Figure 5EIT imaging in a normal respiratory circle. (a) Total boundary voltage variation (TBVV). (b) EIT images. In the EIT images in this study, the red and blue areas represent a regional impedance reduction and increase, respectively.
Figure 6Separation of respiration and blood injection by filtering. (a) Raw EIT images during inhalation when using the data at the end of exhalation as the reference frame, raw total boundary voltage (TBV) during blood injection, and raw power spectra. (b) EIT images, TBV, and power spectra corresponding to blood injection obtained through a 4th-order low-pass Butterworth filter with a cutoff frequency of 0.15 Hz. (c) TBV and power spectra corresponding to respiration obtained by subtracting TBV caused by blood injection from the raw TBV.
Figure 7EIT imaging of the hemothorax procedure in the piglets. (a) A series of reconstructed EIT images of the eight subjects before and during the entire course of blood injection. (b) The individualized region of interest (ROI) in each of the subjects where blood was injected. (c) The statistical comparison of regional impedance variation (RIV) for all the subjects before and after blood injection. (d) The linear regression analysis between RIV in EIT images and the volume of blood injection for all eight piglets as well as for the pooled data. Each line represents a single piglet marked with a unique color and a symbol. The bold blue line denotes the mean relationship between RIV and blood volume for the eight piglets.
Linear regression analysis between regional impedance variation (RIV) in the EIT images and the volume of blood injected into the pleural cavity of each of eight piglets (P1-P8) to establish a hemothorax model. The F test was used to evaluate the established linear statistical model.
| Subject | Determination coefficient ( | Regression coefficient |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | 0.947 | -1.77 × 10−2 | 2.27 × 10−4 |
| P2 | 0.955 | -2.01 × 10−2 | 1.52 × 10−4 |
| P3 | 0.993 | -7.51 × 10−3 | 1.64 × 10−6 |
| P4 | 0.978 | -2.17 × 10−2 | 2.38 × 10−5 |
| P5 | 0.995 | -1.37 × 10−2 | 6.34 × 10−7 |
| P6 | 0.976 | -1.97 × 10−2 | 3.01 × 10−5 |
| P7 | 0.980 | -1.35 × 10−2 | 1.97 × 10−5 |
| P8 | 0.994 | -7.59 × 10−3 | 8.05 × 10−7 |
| Pooled data | 0.669 | -1.52 × 10−2 | 1.41 × 10−14 |