Literature DB >> 8945858

Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study.

K G Boone1, D S Holder.   

Abstract

A computer simulation is used to investigate the relationship between skin impedance and image artefacts in electrical impedance tomography. Sets of electrode impedance are generated with a pseudo-random distribution and used to introduce errors in boundary voltage measurements. To simplify the analysis, the non-idealities in the current injection circuit are replaced by a fixed common-mode error term. The boundary voltages are reconstructed into images and inspected. Where the simulated skin impedance remains constant between measurements, large impedances (> 2k omega) do not cause significant degradation of the image. Where the skin impedances 'drift' between measurements, a drift of 5% from a starting impedance of 100 omega is sufficient to cause significant image distortion. If the skin impedances vary randomly between measurements, they have to be less than 10 omega to allow satisfactory images. Skin impedances are typically 100-200 omega at 50 kHz on unprepared skin. These values are sufficient to cause image distortion if they drift over time. It is concluded that the patient's skin should be abraded to reduce impedance, and measurements should be avoided in the first 10 min after electrode placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8945858     DOI: 10.1007/bf02520003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  3 in total

1.  The Sheffield data collection system.

Authors:  B H Brown; A D Seagar
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1987

2.  Using compound electrodes in electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  P Hua; E J Woo; J G Webster; W J Tompkins
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Finite element modeling of electrode-skin contact impedance in electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  P Hua; E J Woo; J G Webster; W J Tompkins
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.538

  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  EIT image reconstruction with four dimensional regularization.

Authors:  Tao Dai; Manuchehr Soleimani; Andy Adler
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Novel electrode-skin interface for breast electrical impedance scanning.

Authors:  Zhenyu Ji; Xiuzhen Dong; Xuetao Shi; Fusheng You; Feng Fu; Ruigang Liu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Equivalence of time and aperture domain additive noise in ultrasound coherence.

Authors:  Nick B Bottenus; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Different displacement of bioimpedance vector due to Ag/AgCl electrode effect.

Authors:  L Nescolarde; H Lukaski; A De Lorenzo; B de-Mateo-Silleras; M P Redondo-Del-Río; M A Camina-Martín
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Coherence-based quantification of acoustic clutter sources in medical ultrasound.

Authors:  James Long; Will Long; Nick Bottenus; Gregg Trahey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Eigenspace-based beamformer using oblique signal subspace projection for ultrasound plane-wave imaging.

Authors:  Saeid Aliabadi; Yuanyuan Wang; Jinhua Yu; Jinxin Zhao; Wei Guo; Shun Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Real-Time Detection of Hemothorax and Monitoring its Progression in a Piglet Model by Electrical Impedance Tomography: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Lin Yang; Chao Zhang; Wenbo Liu; Hang Wang; Junying Xia; Benyuan Liu; Xuetao Shi; Xiuzhen Dong; Feng Fu; Meng Dai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.