Literature DB >> 9039740

Factors affecting electrode-gel-skin interface impedance in electrical impedance tomography.

E T McAdams1, J Jossinet, A Lackermeier, F Risacher.   

Abstract

The magnitude, mismatch and temporal variations of the electrode-gel-skin interface impedance can cause problems in electrical impedance tomography (EIT) measurement. It is shown that at the high frequencies generally encountered in EIT the capacitive properties of the electrode interface, and especially those of the skin, are of primary importance. A wide range of techniques are reviewed that could possibly be used to minimise these problems. These techniques include the use of skin preparation, penetration enhancers, temperature and electrical impulses. Although several of these techniques appear very attractive, they are not without serious potential drawbacks. A combination of some of these techniques may well hold the key to success.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9039740     DOI: 10.1007/bf02523842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  32 in total

1.  A physical interpretation of Schwan's limit current of linearity.

Authors:  E T McAdams; J Jossinet
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Optimal electrolytic chloriding of silver ink electrodes for use in electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  E T McAdams; P Henry; J M Anderson; J Jossinet
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1992

3.  A hardware design for imaging the electrical impedance of the breast.

Authors:  J Jossinet
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1988

4.  Electrochemical characterization of human skin by impedance spectroscopy: the effect of penetration enhancers.

Authors:  K Kontturi; L Murtomäki; J Hirvonen; P Paronen; A Urtti
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Multi-frequency static imaging in electrical impedance tomography: Part 1. Instrumentation requirements.

Authors:  P J Riu; J Rosell; A Lozano; R Pallàs-Areny
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Skin impedance and electro-osmosis in the human epidermis.

Authors:  S Grimnes
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Impedance measurement of individual skin surface electrodes.

Authors:  S Grimnes
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Multi-electrode systems for electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  E T McAdams; J A McLaughlin; J McC Anderson
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.833

9.  Dielectric breakdown of human skin in vivo.

Authors:  S Grimnes
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 10.  The role of electroosmotic flow in transdermal iontophoresis.

Authors:  M J Pikal
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 15.470

View more
  21 in total

1.  In vivo electrical characteristics of human skin, including at biological active points.

Authors:  E F Prokhorov; J González-Hernández; Y V Vorobiev; E Morales-Sánchez; T E Prokhorova; G Zaldivar Lelo de Larrea
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Investigation into the origin of the noise of surface electrodes.

Authors:  E Huigen; A Peper; C A Grimbergen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Prospective investigation into the influence of various stressors on skin impedance.

Authors:  Michael Winterhalter; Jörg Schiller; Sinika Münte; Michael Bund; Ludwig Hoy; Christoph Weilbach; Siegfried Piepenbrock; Niels Rahe-Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Novel electrode-skin interface for breast electrical impedance scanning.

Authors:  Zhenyu Ji; Xiuzhen Dong; Xuetao Shi; Fusheng You; Feng Fu; Ruigang Liu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  Wearable sensors: modalities, challenges, and prospects.

Authors:  J Heikenfeld; A Jajack; J Rogers; P Gutruf; L Tian; T Pan; R Li; M Khine; J Kim; J Wang; J Kim
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  Statistical estimation of EIT electrode contact impedance using magic Toeplitz matrix.

Authors:  Eugene Demidenko; Andrea Borsic; Yuqing Wan; Ryan J Halter; Alex Hartov
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Absolute Reconstructions Using Rotational Electrical Impedance Tomography for Breast Cancer Imaging.

Authors:  Ethan K Murphy; Aditya Mahara; Ryan J Halter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Impedance sensing device enables early detection of pressure ulcers in vivo.

Authors:  Sarah L Swisher; Monica C Lin; Amy Liao; Elisabeth J Leeflang; Yasser Khan; Felippe J Pavinatto; Kaylee Mann; Agne Naujokas; David Young; Shuvo Roy; Michael R Harrison; Ana Claudia Arias; Vivek Subramanian; Michel M Maharbiz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  In vivo impedance measurements on nerves and surrounding skeletal muscles in rats and human body.

Authors:  E Prokhorov; F Llamas; E Morales-Sánchez; J González-Hernández; A Prokhorov
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Measuring lower leg swelling: optimum frequency for impedance method.

Authors:  A Seo; M Rys; S Konz
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.