Literature DB >> 8136601

Potential biological effects following high X-ray dose interventional procedures.

L K Wagner1, P J Eifel, R A Geise.   

Abstract

Some interventional procedures can result in very high x-ray doses. Potential biological effects of high x-ray doses are reviewed. Deterministic and stochastic effects in skin, bone, parotid glands, and lung are discussed. Threshold doses for the effects and relevant dosimetric principles are addressed. General principles for minimizing the potential for these effects are presented. Knowledge about these effects and the means to minimize radiation dose can assist the physician in the care of patients undergoing lengthy invasive radiologic procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8136601     DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(94)71456-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  70 in total

1.  Doctors' knowledge of exposure to ionising radiation: doctors need to be aware of possible radiation injury from fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Simon S Lo
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-15

2.  In-patient to isocenter KERMA ratios in CT.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Kent M Ogden; Robert L Lavallee; Marsha L Roskopf; Ernest M Scalzetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Xin Liu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Mingliang Qu; Jodie Christner; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2009-10

4.  Cumulative radiation dose during hospitalization for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  S I Moskowitz; W J Davros; M E Kelly; D Fiorella; P A Rasmussen; T J Masaryk
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Comparison of magnetic wire navigation with the conventional wire technique for percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions: a randomised, controlled study.

Authors:  Christian Roth; Rudolf Berger; Sabine Scherzer; Lisa Krenn; Clemens Gangl; Daniel Dalos; Georg Delle-Karth; Thomas Neunteufl
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Use of a graphics processing unit (GPU) to facilitate real-time 3D graphic presentation of the patient skin-dose distribution during fluoroscopic interventional procedures.

Authors:  Vijay Rana; Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2012-02-23

7.  Non-fluoroscopic catheter visualization using MediGuide™ technology: experience from the first 600 procedures.

Authors:  P Sommer; S Richter; G Hindricks; S Rolf
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Updates in the real-time Dose Tracking System (DTS) to improve the accuracy in calculating the radiation dose to the patients skin during fluoroscopic procedures.

Authors:  Vijay K Rana; Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2013-03-06

9.  Radiation dermatitis after spinal arteriovenous malformation embolization: case report.

Authors:  G J Carstens; M B Horowitz; P D Purdy; A G Pandya
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Patient skin dose during neuroembolization by multiple-point measurement using a radiosensitive indicator.

Authors:  S Suzuki; S Furui; Y Matsumaru; S Nobuyuki; M Ebara; T Abe; D Itoh
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.