| Literature DB >> 32089767 |
Heitor Ceolin Araujo1,2, Ana Cláudia Melo Stevanato Nakamune3,4, Wilson Galhego Garcia4, Juliano Pelim Pessan1,2, Cristina Antoniali1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Oxidative stress biomarkers can be found at detectable concentrations in saliva. These salivary biomarkers reflect specific oxidation pathways associated with caries and periodontitis. Our study evaluated the influence of dental caries severity (assessed using the ICCMS™ criteria) on the levels of oxidative stress biomarkers in saliva from children. Unstimulated saliva samples were collected from patients (from one to three years old) in a day care center in Birigui, SP, Brazil, two hours after fasting. Children were divided into four groups (n = 30/group), according to caries severity: caries free (group A), early carious lesions (group B), moderate carious lesions (group C), and advanced carious lesions (group D). The following salivary biomarkers were determined: total proteins (TP), measured by the Lowry method; oxidative damage, measured by the TBARS method; total antioxidant capacity (TAC); superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzymatic antioxidant activity; and uric acid (UA) non-enzymatic antioxidant activity. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test, Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients, and multivariable linear regression (p < 0.05). TP, TAC, SOD enzymatic antioxidant activity, and UA non-enzymatic antioxidant activity increased with caries severity, consequently reducing salivary oxidative damage. It was concluded that higher caries severity increases salivary antioxidant system activity, with consequent reduction in salivary oxidative damage.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32089767 PMCID: PMC7008261 DOI: 10.1155/2020/3695683
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
General characteristics of children by group.
| Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (months) | 17.8 ± 4.5a | 23.6 ± 5.6b | 32.6 ± 4.5c | 35.0 ± 2.8d | ||||
| Gender | Boys | Girls | Boys | Girls | Boys | Girls | Boys | Girls |
| 46.6%a | 53.4%a | 50%a | 50%a | 46.6%a | 53.4%a | 50%a | 50%a | |
| Number of erupted teeth | 12.7 ± 3.8a | 17.4 ± 40b | 19.8 ± 0.5c | 19.9 ± 0.3c | ||||
| Number of lesions ± SD | 0 | 1.93 ± 0.94a | 1.83 ± 0.87a | 2.57 ± 1.10a | ||||
| Salivary flow (mL/min) | 0.187 ± 0.017a | 0.180 ± 0.013a | 0.185 ± 0.013a | 0.181 ± 0.015a | ||||
Similar superscript letters on the same line mean statistical similarity (p > 0.05). Different superscript letters on the same line mean statistical differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Total protein (mg/dL) in saliva samples of caries-free children (Group A) and in those with caries at different stages (Groups B-D). Bars represent the mean ± SD. Equal letters represent statistical similarity (p > 0.05) and different letters mean statistical differences (p < 0.001).
Figure 2Concentration of 2-thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) (in nmol/L for the graph in (a) and in nmol/L/mg protein for the graph in (b)) in the saliva samples of caries-free children (Group A) and in those with caries at different stages (Groups B-D). Bars represent the mean ± SD. Equal letters represent statistical similarity (p > 0.05) and different letters mean statistical differences (p < 0.001).
Pearson's correlation coefficients (r values) among the dependent variables: TBARS (substances reactive to thiobarbituric acid), TAC (total antioxidant capacity), UA (uric acid), and SOD (superoxide dismutase).
| TAC (mmol/L FeSO4/mg protein) | UA (mg/mL/mg protein) | SOD (UE/mL/mg protein) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBARS (mg/mL/mg protein) | -0.85 | -0.35 | -0.65 |
|
| TAC | 0.72 |
Multivariate linear regression analysis of factors associated with oxidative damage.
| Coefficient | Standard deviation |
|
| VIF |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | -0.000986 | 0.0000737 | -13.39 | <0.001 | 3.808 | 0.832 |
| No. of lesions | 0.000219 | 0.000045 | 4.872 | <0.001 | 1.81 | |
| Age (in months) | -0.0000132 | 0.00000887 | -1.486 | 0.14 | 2.949 |
VIF=collinearity; t = force of the equation.
Figure 3Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) (in μmol/L FeSO4 for the graph in (a) and in μmol/L FeSO4/mg protein for the graph in (b)) in saliva samples of caries-free children (Group A) and in those with caries at different stages (Groups B-D). Bars represent the mean ± SD. Equal letters represent statistical similarity (p > 0.05) and different letters mean statistical differences (p < 0.001).
Figure 4Uric acid (UA) concentration (in mg/mL for the graph in (a) and in mg/mL/mg protein for the graph in (b)) in saliva samples of caries-free children (Group A) and in those with caries at different stages (Groups B-D). Bars represent the mean ± SD. Equal letters represent statistical similarity (p > 0.05) and different letters mean statistical differences (p < 0.001).
Figure 5Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (in UE/mL for the graph in (a) and in UE/mL/mg protein for the graph in (b)) in saliva samples of caries-free children (Group A) and in those of with caries at different stages (Groups B-D). Bars represent the mean ± SD. Equal letters represent statistical similarity (p > 0.05) and different letters mean statistical differences (p < 0.001).