| Literature DB >> 32054916 |
Fariba Peytam1,2, Mehdi Adib3, Reihaneh Shourgeshty1,2, Loghman Firoozpour2, Mahmoud Rahmanian-Jazi2, Mehdi Jahani1, Setareh Moghimi2, Kouros Divsalar4, Mohammad Ali Faramarzi5, Somayeh Mojtabavi5, Fatemeh Safari6, Mohammad Mahdavi7, Alireza Foroumadi8,9.
Abstract
In an attempt to find novel α-glucosidase inhibitors, an efficient, straightforward reaction to synthesize a library of fully substituted 6-amino-pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines 3 has been investigated. Heating a mixture of α-azidochalcones 1 andEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32054916 PMCID: PMC7018746 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59079-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Example of marketed drugs with pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine core.
Scheme 1The general synthetic route for highly substituted 6-amino-pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines 3.
Scheme 2Proposed reaction mechanism.
Substrate scope and in vitro α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of compounds3a–z.
| Compound | Ar | Ar' | Ar” | IC50 (µM)a |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37.8 ± 2.5 | ||||
| 40.0 ± 2.9 | ||||
| 44.5 ± 3.1 | ||||
| 15.2 ± 0.4 | ||||
| 63.3 ± 4.4 | ||||
| 85.7 ± 5.3 | ||||
| 75.6 ± 5.0 | ||||
| 25.7 ± 1.1 | ||||
| 28.1 ± 1.2 | ||||
| 30.3 ± 2.1 | ||||
| 57.4 ± 3.8 | ||||
| 49.3 ± 3.3 | ||||
| 24.7 ± 1.1 | ||||
| 42.6 ± 1.1 | ||||
| 56.2 ± 3.2 | ||||
| 33.2 ± 2.1 | ||||
| 36.5 ± 2.5 | ||||
| 18.4 ± 0.6 | ||||
| 42.3 ± 3.1 | ||||
| 60.0 ± 4.0 | ||||
| 55.6 ± 3.6 | ||||
| 17.6 ± 0.6 | ||||
| 53.7 ± 3.4 | ||||
| 80.3 ± 5.2 | ||||
| 38.2 ± 2.8 | ||||
| 19.3 ± 0.9 | ||||
| — | — | — | 750.0 ± 1.5 | |
aValues are the mean ± SD. All experiments were performed at least three times.
Substrate scope and in vitro α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of compounds 3aa-ai.
| Compound | Ar | Ar' | IC50 (µM)a |
|---|---|---|---|
| 94.0 ± 3.6 | |||
| 150.4 ± 4.0 | |||
| 185.0 ± 6.0 | |||
| 141.0 ± 7.0 | |||
| 116.3 ± 1.8 | |||
| 65.5 ± 3.0 | |||
| 201.3 ± 4.2 | |||
| 161.7 ± 3.2 | |||
| 153.0 ± 5.0 | |||
| — | — | 750.0 ± 1.5 | |
aValues are the mean ± SD. All experiments were performed at least three times.
Figure 2Enzyme Kinetic Studies: (a) The Lineweaver–Burk plot in the absence and presence of different concentrations of compound 3d. (b) The secondary plot between Km and various concentrations of compound 3d. (c) The Lineweaver–Burk plot in the absence and presence of different concentrations of compound 3af. (d) The secondary plot between Km and various concentrations of compound 3af.
Computed ADME properties for the compounds 3.
| Code | MW (g/mol) | HBA | HBD | nROTB | Log | Log | TPSA (Å2) | Bioavailability Score | Drug-likeness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 468.93 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 4.27 | 4.49 | 82.51 | 0.55 | Yes | |
| 482.96 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 4.34 | 4.68 | 82.51 | 0.55 | Yes | |
| 464.53 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 4.07 | 3.69 | 91.74 | 0.55 | Yes | |
| 498.96 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 4.19 | 4.15 | 91.74 | 0.55 | Yes | |
| 468.94 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 4.25 | 4.49 | 82.51 | 0.55 | Yes | |
| 474.97 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 4.22 | 4.12 | 110.75 | 0.55 | Yes |
Figure 3The predicted binding mode of acarbose in the active site pocket.
Figure 4The predicted binding modes of compounds (a) 3d and (b) 3af in the active site pocket.