Literature DB >> 32042741

Single 3° tapered fluted femoral stems demonstrate low subsidence at mid-term follow-up in severe bony deficiency.

Albert W T Ngu1, Fiachra E Rowan1, Alberto V Carli1, Fares S Haddad1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tapered femoral stems have become popular in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Increasing the distal taper angle may mitigate subsidence. This study reports osseointegration of a new 3 degree distal taper revision stem at minimum 4 years post-operatively.
METHODS: Indication for surgery, pre-operative bony deficiency and latest clinical, tribological and radiological follow-up were analysed. Radiographs were assessed by two blinded observers for preoperative femoral bone stock according to Paprosky, postoperative subsidence according to Callaghan and restoration of femoral bone stock over time according to Kolstad. Stem integration was determined using the Rodriguez classification.
RESULTS: Twenty-three cases were analyzed at 5.9±1.0 years. All patients presented with Paprosky III defects. All stems met the criteria for osseointegration. Spot welds occurred distal to the proximal modular junction and at the tip. Two femora with severe proximal femoral bone loss recovered bone stock by final follow-up but two demonstrated stress shielding. No intraoperative fractures occurred. One stem subsided early but remained stable and osseointegrated at final follow up. There were no stem failures due to taper corrosion or modular junctional failure.
CONCLUSIONS: This study reports good osseointegration and low subsidence with a novel fluted, 3-degree tapered femoral stem demonstrates at medium-term follow-up in cases with severe femoral bone deficiency. 2019 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Revision hip arthroplasty; femoral bone loss; osseointegration; tapered stems

Year:  2019        PMID: 32042741      PMCID: PMC6990008          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  22 in total

1.  Cone prosthesis for the hip joint.

Authors:  H Wagner; M Wagner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  The Wagner revision prosthesis consistently restores femoral bone structure.

Authors:  J Isacson; A Stark; R Wallensten
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification.

Authors:  Craig J Della Valle; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Influence of technique with distally fixed modular stems in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Preetesh D Patel; Alison K Klika; Trevor G Murray; Karim A Elsharkawy; Viktor E Krebs; Wael K Barsoum
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  A distal fluted, proximal modular femoral prosthesis in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Myung-Sik Park; Ju-Hong Lee; Jong-Hyuk Park; Dong-Hun Ham; Yang-Keun Rhee
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Patterns of osseointegration and remodeling in femoral revision with bone loss using modular, tapered, fluted, titanium stems.

Authors:  Jose A Rodriguez; Ajit J Deshmukh; Wolfgang U Klauser; Vijay J Rasquinha; Philipp Lubinus; Chitranjan S Ranawat
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem : evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years.

Authors:  P Böhm; O Bischel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Hospital resource utilization for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Patricia Katz; Miriam Cisternas; Linda Ono; Michael D Ries; Jonathan Showstack
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Adverse local tissue reaction arising from corrosion at the femoral neck-body junction in a dual-taper stem with a cobalt-chromium modular neck.

Authors:  H John Cooper; Robert M Urban; Richard L Wixson; R Michael Meneghini; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Accuracy of migration analysis in hip arthroplasty. Digitized and conventional radiography, compared to radiostereometry in 51 patients.

Authors:  H Malchau; J Kärrholm; Y X Wang; P Herberts
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1995-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of two tapered fluted modular titanium (TFMT) stems used in revision hip arthroplasty from a single center.

Authors:  Rajesh Pawar; Rye Yap; Jody Blow; Mohanrao Garabadi; Mark Rowsell; Hasnat Minhas; Prasad Antapur
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-01

2.  Subsidence of monoblock and modular titanium fluted tapered stems in revision hip arthroplasty: A retrospective multicentre comparison study.

Authors:  Eoghan Pomeroy; Seán O Flynn; Mihai Grigoras; Terence P Murphy; Alexandra I Stavrakis; Fiachra E Rowan
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-09-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.