Literature DB >> 10990383

The Wagner revision prosthesis consistently restores femoral bone structure.

J Isacson1, A Stark, R Wallensten.   

Abstract

The short-term results are reported for 43 hip revision operations with the long-stemmed Wagner prosthesis. The patients were followed-up for an average of 25 months. The Charnley scores were; pain 5.2, movement 4.0 and walking 4.0. All patients except one showed abundant new bone formation. The stem subsided more than 20 mm in 5 patients and in 22 the subsidence was less than 5 mm. The major complication was dislocation, which occurred in 9 patients; 8 of these were reoperated and from then on remained stable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10990383      PMCID: PMC3619870          DOI: 10.1007/s002640000130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  8 in total

1.  Distal femoral stem-bone anchorage of a cementless revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of 14 patients by CT.

Authors:  Rüdiger J Weiss; Fredrik Strömwall; Mats O Beckman; Karl A Hansson; André Stark
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

2.  Proximal bone remodelling differed between two types of titanium long femoral components after cementless revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daiki Iwana; Takashi Nishii; Hidenobu Miki; Nobuhiko Sugano; Takashi Sakai; Kenji Ohzono; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Single 3° tapered fluted femoral stems demonstrate low subsidence at mid-term follow-up in severe bony deficiency.

Authors:  Albert W T Ngu; Fiachra E Rowan; Alberto V Carli; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 4.  The transfemoral approach for controlled removal of well-fixed femoral stems in hip revision surgery.

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-11-09

5.  Influence of prosthesis design and implantation technique on implant stresses after cementless revision THR.

Authors:  Markus O Heller; Manav Mehta; William R Taylor; Dong-Yeong Kim; Andrew Speirs; Georg N Duda; Carsten Perka
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Differences between proximal bone remodeling in femoral revisions for aseptic loosening and periprosthetic fractures using the Wagner SL stem.

Authors:  Gábor Friebert; Csaba Gombár; András Bozó; Ilona Polyák; Ádám Brzózka; Krisztián Sisák
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Stem modularity alone is not effective in reducing dislocation rate in hip revision surgery.

Authors:  Dario Regis; Andrea Sandri; Pietro Bartolozzi
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-11-18

8.  Extensively coated revision stems in proximally deficient femur: early results in 15 patients.

Authors:  S K S Marya; R Thukral
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.251

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.