Literature DB >> 19729272

Influence of technique with distally fixed modular stems in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Preetesh D Patel1, Alison K Klika, Trevor G Murray, Karim A Elsharkawy, Viktor E Krebs, Wael K Barsoum.   

Abstract

Distally fixed modular implants have seen a recent increase in use, to manage proximal femoral bone loss often encountered during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Forty-three distally fixed modular stems implanted at our institution between 1999 and 2006 were clinically and radiographically reviewed. These patients had either a minimum 2-year follow-up (average, 2.4 years; range, 2-5.6 years) or failure (ie, explant or rerevision required). Eleven stems subsided, and 4 were rerevised (n = 4), for a rate of 9.3%. All revised stems were radiographically undersized, emphasizing the importance of the technique. Although being a valuable option in revision THA, these stems are not free of complications. The high rate of subsidence encountered in our early experience shows that there is a learning curve. This complication is preventable by avoiding undersizing. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19729272     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  11 in total

1.  Cementless femoral revision in patients with a previous cemented prosthesis.

Authors:  Min Zeng; Jie Xie; Mingqing Li; Shaoru Lin; Yihe Hu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  The management of type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: when to fix and when to revise.

Authors:  Adam T Yasen; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  SF-36 physical function and general health domains are independent predictors of acute hospital length of stay after hip fracture surgery.

Authors:  Craigven H S Sim; Rehena Sultana; Kenny X K Tay; C Y Howe; T S Howe; Joyce S B Koh
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2022-07-07

4.  Mid- to long-term results of the Cone-Conical modular system in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Abd-Allah El Ashmawy; Hazem A H Hosny; Ahmed El-Bakoury; Rathan Yarlagadda; Jonathan Keenan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Subsidence of monoblock and modular titanium fluted tapered stems in revision hip arthroplasty: A retrospective multicentre comparison study.

Authors:  Eoghan Pomeroy; Seán O Flynn; Mihai Grigoras; Terence P Murphy; Alexandra I Stavrakis; Fiachra E Rowan
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-09-13

6.  Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with modular stems.

Authors:  Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Jesus Fernandez-Lombardia; Jimena Llorens de los Rios; Ivan Perez-Coto; Susana Iglesias-Fernandez
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Single 3° tapered fluted femoral stems demonstrate low subsidence at mid-term follow-up in severe bony deficiency.

Authors:  Albert W T Ngu; Fiachra E Rowan; Alberto V Carli; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

8.  Medium-term outcomes of cemented prostheses and cementless modular prostheses in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Long Wang; Pengfei Lei; Jie Xie; Kanghua Li; Zixun Dai; Yihe Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Medium Term Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Using a Modular Tapered Hip Revision Implant.

Authors:  Gihan Jayasinghe; Chris Buckle; Lucy Clare Maling; Christopher To; Chukwudubem Anibueze; Parthiban Vinayakam; Richard Slack
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-04-05

10.  Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using a modular tapered, fluted titanium stem: 5- to 16-year results of 163 cases.

Authors:  Dieter C Wirtz; Sascha Gravius; Rudolf Ascherl; Miguel Thorweihe; Raimund Forst; Ulrich Noeth; Uwe M Maus; Matthias D Wimmer; Günther Zeiler; Moritz C Deml
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.