| Literature DB >> 32042441 |
Il-Hoon Cho1, Dong Hyung Kim2, Sangsoo Park3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The electrochemical biosensor is one of the typical sensing devices based on transducing the biochemical events to electrical signals. In this type of sensor, an electrode is a key component that is employed as a solid support for immobilization of biomolecules and electron movement. Thanks to numerous nanomaterials that possess the large surface area, synergic effects are enabled by improving loading capacity and the mass transport of reactants for achieving high performance in terms of analytical sensitivity. MAIN BODY: We categorized the current electrochemical biosensors into two groups, carbon-based (carbon nanotubes and graphene) and non-carbon-based nanomaterials (metallic and silica nanoparticles, nanowire, and indium tin oxide, organic materials). The carbon allotropes can be employed as an electrode and supporting scaffolds due to their large active surface area as well as an effective electron transfer rate. We also discussed the non-carbon nanomaterials that are used as alternative supporting components of the electrode for improving the electrochemical properties of biosensors.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32042441 PMCID: PMC7001310 DOI: 10.1186/s40824-019-0181-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomater Res ISSN: 1226-4601
Fig. 1Scheme of analytical principle for electrochemical biosensors based on carbon and non-carbon nanomaterials
Summary of representative carbon-based nanomaterials used in electrode and label of electrochemical biosensor
| Materials | Advantage | Limitations | Feature | Limit of detection | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWCNT | Large surface area to volume ratio (S/V) Low charge-carried density Delocalized π-orbitals Electrical conductivity improvements | Limited surface to interface with large biological components Nonspecific adsorption of protein Difficult manipulation during sensor fabrication process Difficult chemical functionalization | Electrode | DeoxyriboNucleic acid (DNA) 71 pM | [ |
| Electrode | Glucose 7.06 μA/mM | [ | |||
| Electrode | aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) 0.01 nM | [ | |||
| Electrode | Anti-IgG 0.2 pM | [ | |||
| MWCNT | Excellent conducting and electro-catalytic properties | Need to functionalize surface for increasing biocompatibility Irreversible agglomerates in aqueous solution | Electrode | Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) 0.0055 fM | [ |
| Electrode | Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) 0.05 pM | [ | |||
| Electrode | Prostate specific antigen (PSA) 0.11 fM | [ | |||
| Electrode | Mouse IgG 0.066 pM | [ | |||
| Label | PSA 0.13 pM | [ | |||
| Graphene | High S/V Large active sites Fast electron transfer High thermal conductivity Better mechanical flexibility Good biocompatibility | Hard to dissolve in water | Electrode | dibutyl phthalate (DBP) 0.025 μM | [ |
| Electrode | PSA 0.33 pM | [ | |||
| Electrode | Cystatin C 0.002 nM | [ | |||
| Label | Cry1C 0.02 pM | [ | |||
| Label | CEA 0.003 pM | [ |
Summary for the features of non-carbon nanomaterials to construct electrochemical biosensors
| Materials | Advantage | Limitations | Feature | Limit of detection | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metallic nanoparticles | Efficient electron transfer Increase in S/V Supplying superior conductivity Good biocompatibility Easy functionalization | Electrical instability in high salt concentration Inconsistent upon signal amplification | Electrode (AuNPs) | CEA 0.01 pM | [ |
Electrode (AgNPs) | PSA 0.1 pM | [ | |||
Label (Fe3O4/Ag/Au) | IgG 0.33 fM | [ | |||
Label (PtNPs) | Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) 0.001 pM | [ | |||
Label (Pt/Cu NPs) | PSA 0.55 fM | [ | |||
| Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) | High pore volume and surface area Good electron transfer and high loading capability Well-defined surface properties Tunability of size and shape | Difficult in preparation of well-ordered Scattered size distribution Formulation of stable-colloidal suspensions | Label (MSN/Au) | PSA 0.01 pM | [ |
Label (MSN/Au/Ru) | p53 22.8 fM | [ | |||
Label (MSN/Ag) | N6-methyladenosine (m6A) 0.078 nM | [ | |||
| Nanowire | High S/V Rapid response High electro-catalytic capability and reproducibility Improvement of the charge transfer and stability | Decrease in electrostatic potential with distance | Electrode (Ag) | IgG 0.03 pM | [ |
Label (Pt) | hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) 0.14 fM | [ | |||
Electrode (Cu2O) | AFP 0.0015 fM | [ | |||
Electrode (Si) | cardiac troponin I (cTnI) 0.14 pM | [ | |||
| ITO | Low cost / High transmittance Good electrical conductivity Ease of surface modification | Slow kinetics of electron- transfer upon coating surface with antibodies | Electrode (ITO/PET) | Receptor for Activated C Kinase 1 0.83 fM | [ |
Electrode (ITO) | Creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) 0.24 fM | [ | |||
| Electrode (ITO/Au) | Guanine 250 nM | [ | |||
| Electrode (ITO) | microRNA 2.0 fM | [ | |||
| Organic polymer | High-throughput Low-cost Good flexibility, functionality, solubility, and specificity | Need to reproducibility of thin-film morphology Chance to physical delamination High operating voltages Uncertainties in material stability | Electrode (5, 2′:5′,2″-terthiophene-3′-carboxylic acid) | Glutamate 0.1 μM | [ |
Electrode (polypyrrole) | Serotonin 0.03 μM | [ | |||
Electrode (poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene) | Dopamine 0.22 μM | [ |