| Literature DB >> 27739493 |
Abstract
In this work, we presented a ratiometric electrochemical immunosensor based on redox substrate and immunoprobe. Carboxymethyl cellulose-Au-Pb2+ (CMC-Au-Pb2+) and carbon-Au-Cu2+ (C-Au-Cu2+) nanocomposites were firstly synthesized and implemented as redox substrate and immunoprobe with strong current signals at -0.45 V and 0.15 V, respectively. Human immunoglobulin G (IgG) was used as a model analyte to examine the analytical performance of the proposed method. The current signals of CMC-Au-Pb2+ (Isubstrate) and C-Au-Cu2+ (Iprobe) were monitored. The effect of redox substrate and immunoprobe behaved as a better linear relationship between Iprobe/Isubstrate and Lg CIgG (ng mL-1). By measuring the signal ratio Iprobe/Isubstrate, the sandwich immunosensor for IgG exhibited a wide linear range from 1 fg mL-1 to 100 ng mL-1, which was two orders of magnitude higher than other previous works. The limit of detection reached 0.26 fg mL-1. Furthermore, for human serum samples, the results from this method were consistent with those of the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), demonstrating that the proposed immunoassay was of great potential in clinical diagnosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27739493 PMCID: PMC5064308 DOI: 10.1038/srep35440
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1TEM images of CMC-Au (A,B), CNP (C) and CNP-Au (D).
Figure 2Schematic illustration of the function principle and the fabrication procedure of the proposed immunosensor.
Figure 3(A) SWV responses of the modified electrodes: CMC-Au-Pb2+/GCE (a), Anti-IgG/CMC-Au-Pb2+/GCE (b), BSA/Anti-IgG/CMC-Au-Pb2+/GCE (c), IgG/BSA/Anti-IgG/CMC-Au-Pb2+/GCE (d) and C-Au-Cu2+-IgG/IgG/BSA/Anti-IgG/CMC-Au-Pb2+/GCE (e). (B) EIS of the modified electrodes: bare GCE (a), CMC-Au-Pb2+/GCE (b), Anti-IgG/CMC-Au-Pb2+/GCE (c), BSA/Anti-IgG/CMC-Au-Pb2+/GCE (d), BSA/Anti-IgG/CMC-Au-Pb2+/GCE (e) and C-Au-Cu2+-IgG/BSA/Anti-IgG/CMC-Au-Pb2+/GCE (f).
Figure 4(A) SWV responses of the immunosensor for different concentrations of IgG. (B) Calibration curves between the Isubstrate/Iprobe and logarithm of IgG concentration.
Comparison of the performances of the present and referenced electrochemical biosensors for IgG.
| Method | LDR | LOD | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|
| (ng mL−1) | (ng mL−1) | ||
| DPV | 0.01–10.0 | 6.9 × 10−3 | |
| DPV | 0.1–1 × 105 | 0.05 | |
| DPV | 0.01–500 | 9.7 × 10−3 | |
| DPV | 0.01–100 | 1 × 10−3 | |
| EIS | 0.5–125 | 0.02 | |
| i-t | 5 × 10−5–5 | 3.2 × 10−6 | |
| LSV | 1 × 10−6–1 | 5 × 10−7 | |
| PC | 1 × 10−5–1.0 | 6 × 10−6 | |
| SWV | 30-1 × 103 | 25 | |
| SWV | 1 × 10−3–0.1 | 5 × 10−5 | |
| SWV | 1 × 10−5–100 | 2.6 × 10−6 | This Work |
*Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), amperometric i-t curve (i-t), photocurrent analysis (PC), linear sweep voltammetry (LSV).