| Literature DB >> 33121053 |
Fanny J González-Fuentes1, Gustavo A Molina2, Rodolfo Silva3, José Luis López-Miranda1, Rodrigo Esparza1, Angel R Hernandez-Martinez1, Miriam Estevez1.
Abstract
Detection and quantification of diverse analytes such as molecules, cells receptor and even particles and nanoparticles, play an important role in biomedical research, particularly in electrochemical sensing platform technologies. In this study, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) prepared by green synthesis from Sargassum sp. were characterized using ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) and Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopies, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS) and zeta potential (ζ) obtaining organic capped face-centered cubic 80-100 nm AuNPs with an excellent stability in a wide range of pH. The AuNPs were used to modify a carbon nanotubes-screen printed electrode (CNT-SPE), through the drop-casting method, to assemble a novel portable electrochemical sensing platform for glucose, using a novel combination of components, which together have not been employed. The ability to sense and measure glucose was demonstrated, and its electrochemical fundamentals was studied using cyclic voltammetry (CV). The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) to glucose were 50 μM and 98 μM, respectively, and these were compared to those of other sensing platforms.Entities:
Keywords: Sargassum sp.; carbon nanotubes-screen printed electrodes; electrochemistry; green synthesis; nanoparticles; sensing platform
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33121053 PMCID: PMC7662439 DOI: 10.3390/s20216108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Electrochemical oxidation of the CNT surface on SPE. (a) Application of a H2SO4 drop on the CNT, (b) cyclic voltammetry for electrochemical oxidation, and (c) oxidized surface of the CNT on the SPE.
Figure 2Electrode modification pathway by drop-casting technique using green synthesis AuNPs from Ssp for the assembly of a sensor with carbon nanotubes-screen printed electrodes (CNT-SPE) for glucose detection and quantification. (a) Extract of Sargassum sp. by infusion method. (b) Green synthesis of AuNPs using Ssp extract. (c) AuNPs with an organic capping from Ssp compounds. (d) Drop-casting of AuNPs on CNT-SPE electrode and their interaction. (e) Semi-reaction of glucose oxidation on the CNT-SPE modified with AuNPs.
Figure 3(a) UV-Vis analysis of the precursor salt, Ssp extract, and AuNPs before and after the purification process. (b,c) UV-Vis spectra of the zones I and II obtained from the (a).
Figure 4UV-Vis analysis of AuNPs varying (a) HAuCl4 solution concentration and (b) Sargassum sp. extract volume, (c) Rietveld refinement XRD pattern of Au nanoparticles.
Figure 5(a) FT-IR analysis of AuNPs, and Sargassum sp. extract before and after the synthesis reaction. (b) Scheme of the reaction mechanism for AuNPs in the presence of phenolic compounds and (c) Scheme for the reaction mechanism for AuNPs in presence of (1) alginic acid and (2) fucoidan.
Figure 6(a) SE-SEM and (b) BSE+SE SEM images showing the size and morphology of AuNPs synthesized with Ssp extract.
Figure 7DLS graph and zeta potential (ζ) of AuNPs as a function of pH, ranging from 3 to 12.
Figure 8Cyclic voltammetry of (a) Sorensen buffer pH7, (b) Glucose 8 mM, (c) Glucose 4 mM on CNT-SPE electrochemically activated (CNT-SPE/A) and without activation (CNT-SPE/NA), and (d) comparison between Sorensen buffer (pH = 7) and glucose 8 mM on CNT-SPE/A.
Scheme 1Reactions involved in the oxidation and reduction of (a) Sorensen buffer and (b) glucose to sorbitol.
Figure 9(a,b) SE-SEM images of commercial CNT-SPE, (c,d) SE-SEM images of the commercial CNT-SPE modified with AuNPs, and (e) EDS spectrum of commercial CNT-SPE and AuNPs.
Figure 10Cyclic voltammogram curves of (a) Sorensen buffer (support electrolyte @ pH = 7) on CNT-SPE/A and CNT-SPE/A/AuNPs, (b) close up of the oxidation peaks of CNT-SPE/A and CNT-SPE/A/AuNPs on the support electrolyte, (c) glucose 8 mM studied on CNT-SPE/A and glucose 8 mM on CNT-SPE/A/AuNPs after 24 h modification, (d) glucose 4 mM on CNT-SPE/A/AuNPs after 5 and 24 h modification.
Scheme 2Mechanism proposed for glucose electrooxidation.
Figure 11(a) Cyclic voltammogram at different scan rates, (b) plots of anodic peak currents versus scan rate, up to 100 mV-s−1 (c) anodic peak currents versus scan rate up to 80 mV-s−1 and (d) logarithmic plots of anodic peak currents versus scan rate. All the voltammograms correspond to glucose 10 mM in Sorensen buffer pH 7 on CNT-SPE/A/AuNPs.
Figure 12Linear regression to anodic potential against logarithmic sweep rate of glucose 10 mM on CNT-SPE/A/AuNPs in Sorensen buffer pH 7.
Figure 13(a) Cyclic voltammetry to glucose at different concentrations, (b) Calibration curve using the cathodic peak currents, (c) Close-up of the oxidation signal, (d) Close-up of the reduction signal.
Figure 14(a) Effects of the presence of food additives fructose and citric acid on the CV measurement for 7 mM of glucose in CNT-SPE/A/AuNPs, (b) electrochemical response stability of the CNT-SPE electrode after 30 days to 7 mM of glucose, (c) evaluation of repeatability, and (d) evaluation of reproducibility.
Figure 15Cyclic voltammogram analysis corresponding to prepared orange juice, and glucose 7 mM. Scan rate: 50 mV/s and window potential: −1.0 to +1.0 V on CNT-SPE/A/AuNPs in Sorensen buffer pH 7.
Comparison of different electrochemical sensors for detecting glucose.
| Working Electrode | Type of Cell | Advantage | Disadvantage | LOD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu-nanoflower decorated AuNPs-GO Nano Fibers [ | Conventional 3-electrode cell. | Promising electrochemical biosensor | Uses enzyme, electrospinning and requiring an organic solvent, which is harmful to health and environment | 0.018 μM |
| Three-dimensional graphene foam decorated with Cu-xCu2O nanoparticles [ | Conventional 3-electrode cell: | Inexpensive, feasible, and non-enzymatic | Mercury content in the reference electrode which makes it toxic | 16 μM |
| Gold layer onto graphene paper [ | Conventional 3-electrode cell: | High performance, stability, non-enzymatic | Require additional methods to modification such as furnace or laser | Down to 2.5 μM |
| Nanoporous | Conventional 3-electrode cell: | Enhanced electrocatalytic activity towards glucose oxidation and non-enzymatic | Highly specialized equipment to produce the Pt-Au alloy and additional preparation for an electrochemical ink | 0.5 μM |
| Pt surface with nanostructures AuNPs with GOx 3 [ | Conventional 3-electrode cell: | Promising applicability for glucose detection in saliva | Highly specialized process which use chromium for AuNPs pattering on Pt | 3.4 nM |
| Au-Pt bimetallic nanoparticles on SWCNT 4 [ | Conventional 3-electrode cell | In-situ synthesis of Au-Pt nanoparticles on working electrode | Use of a catalytic ink based on highly toxic metals such as cobalt (II) molybdenum (II) | 50 μM |
| PTFE 5/GOx/PANI 6/MWCNT 7 on glassy carbon electrode [ | Conventional 3-electrode cell: | High biocompatibility, selectivity, reproducibility, and stability | Uses enzyme, previous synthesis of various components used for the working electrode and sealant needed to maintain the layer-by-layer structure | 0.19 μM |
| Ternary layer of ITO/PbS/SiO2/AuNPs [ | Conventional 3-electrode cell: | Photoelectrochemical detection of glucose | Use of toxic reactants as lead (II) used for Pbs QD | 0.46 μM |
| G-AuNPs | CNT-SPE | It is a miniaturized system that only requires 50 μL of sample | Its detection limit can be an area of opportunity | 50 μM |
1 Reference electrode 2 Counter electrode 3 Glucose oxidase 4 Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. 5 Poly(tetrafluoroethylene) 6 Poly(aniline) 7 Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes.