| Literature DB >> 32019268 |
Jolanta Jaroszuk-Ściseł1, Artur Nowak1, Iwona Komaniecka2, Adam Choma2, Anna Jarosz-Wilkołazka3, Monika Osińska-Jaroszuk3, Renata Tyśkiewicz1,4, Adrian Wiater1, Jerzy Rogalski3.
Abstract
Exopolymeric substances (Entities:
Keywords: FTIR analyses; Fusarium culmorum; antioxidant activity; culture optimization; exopolymeric substances; sugar monomers
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32019268 PMCID: PMC7037457 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25030616
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Scheme for the procedure of isolation and fractionation of EPS from liquid cultures of the three Fusarium culmorum strains (DEMFc2, DEMFc5 and DEMFc37) in three forms: Ethanol Precipitated (EP), Crude (C) and Proteolysed EPS (P) and the protocol for studies of EPS properties.
Figure 2Macrographs (A, D, F, G) and LM micrographs (B, C) documenting the steps of the procedure of obtaining three forms of EPS from three Fusarium culmorum strain cultures.
Figure 3EPS precipitation procedure using different alcohols (methanol, ethanol) and different liquid culture:alcohol ratio.
Figure 4Fungal dry biomass [g/L], EPS yield: EPS concentration [g/L], EPS concentration converted into fungal biomass dry weight [mg/g], and final pH of the post-culture liquid at different condition of: (A) time of incubation, (B) temperature of incubation, (C) medium initial pH value of F. culmorum cultures. Statistical data analysis: one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s HSD test, p < 0.05. Mean values labeled with the same letter within the same series are not significantly different (p > 0.05). Standard deviations are shown as deviation bars (n = 9).
Figure 5Principal component analysis (PCA) - dependence of EPS concentrations (EPS), fungal dry biomass (B), and pH values in post-culture liquid on the cultivation time in cultures of F. culmorum strains with sucrose (S) and peptone (P) as an C and N source, respectively.
Figure 6The EPS concentration in F. culmorum strain culture on: (A). carbon source, (B). sucrose concentration (g/L), C:N ratio, (C). nitrogen source, (D). peptone concentration (g/L), N:C ratio. One-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s HSD test, p < 0.05. Mean values labeled with the same letter within the same series are not significantly different (p > 0.05). Standard deviations are shown as deviation bars (n = 9).
Figure 7PCA-dependence of EPS concentrations (EPS), fungal dry biomass (B), and pH values in post-culture liquid on: (A) C and N source type, (B) sucrose concentration (g/L), (C) peptone concentration (g/L) in F. culmorum strains culture. Descriptions: S – sucrose, P – peptone, G – glucose, F – fructose, M – mannose, N – ammonium nitrate, S - ammonium sulphate; the numbers correspond to the concentration of C and N sources.
Figure 8Total sugar in crude (C) and proteolysed (P) EPS obtained from cultures of three F. culmorum strains: DEMFc2, DEMFc5, and DEMFc37. ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s HSD test, p < 0.05. Mean values labeled with the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05). Standard deviations are shown as deviation bars (n = 9).
Figure 9Concentration of protein, phenolic compounds and total sugar in water solution of crude (C) and proteolysed (P) EPS obtained from cultures of three F. culmorum strains: DEMFc2, DEMFc5, and DEMFc37. ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s HSD test, p < 0.05. Mean values labeled with the same letter within the same series are not significantly different (p > 0.05). Standard deviations are shown as deviation bars (n = 9).
Figure 10Concentration of protein (A), phenolic compounds (B) and total sugar (C) in (I). Solutions (water, sodium hydroxide, hydrochloride) obtained by dissolving EPS directly in each of the three solvents and (II). fractions (aqueous-water, alkalic-sodium hydroxide, acidic-hydrochloride), obtained in step fractionation of crude (C) and proteolysed (P) EPS obtained from cultures of three F. culmorum strains: DEMFc2, DEMFc5, and DEMFc37. ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s HSD test, p < 0.05. Mean values labeled with the same letter within the same series are not significantly different (p > 0.05). Standard deviations are shown as deviation bars (n = 9).
Figure 11Sum of protein (A), phenolic compounds (B) and total sugar (C) in three I. Solutions (water, sodium hydroxide, hydrochloride) obtained by dissolving EPS directly in each of the three solvents and three II. fractions (aqueous-water, alkalic-sodium hydroxide, acidic-hydrochloride) obtained in step fractionation of crude (C) and proteolysed (P) EPS from cultures of three F. culmorum strains: DEMFc2, DEMFc5, and DEMFc37. ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s HSD test, p < 0.05. Mean values labeled with the same letter within the same series are not significantly different (p > 0.05). Standard deviations are shown as deviation bars (n = 9).
Figure 12Percentage (%) content of sugar monomers (mannose, glucose, galactose, arabinose, glucosamine and galactosamine) in: (A) crude EPS (C) and (B) proteolysed (P) EPS obtained from cultures of three F. culmorum strains: DEMFc2, DEMFc5, and DEMFc37.
Distribution of the main peaks at FT-IR spectra of proteolysed EPS (P) obtained from cultures of three F. culmorum strains: DEMFc2, DEMFc5, and DEMFc37.
| Wavenumbers [cm−1] | Functional Groups Identified |
|---|---|
| 3260 | -OH; stretching vibrations of OH groups related to inter-residue hydrogen linkages |
| 2928 | C-H; stretching vibrations of aromatic and aliphatic C-H groups |
| 2320 | N-H groups; stretching vibrations of N-H groups from protein |
| 1643 | C=C ring carbons; stretching vibrations from the hexameric ring carbons (phenolic compounds or amino acids) |
| 1420 | -OH groups; stretching vibrations from alcohol -OH groups |
| 1040–1060 | -C-O- and -C-C- stretching vibrations and –C-OH- bending vibrations |
| 880 | the β-glycosidic linkages from sugars |
| 860 | C-H aryl; bending vibrations from aromatic rings |
Figure 13Infrared (FTIR) spectra of A. crude EPS (C) and B. proteolysed EPS (P) obtained from cultures of three F. culmorum strains: DEMFc2, DEMFc5, and DEMFc37.
Molecular weight distributions of proteolysed EPS (P) obtained from cultures of three F. culmorum strains.
| Peak No. | DEMFc2 | DEMFc5 | DEMFc37 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mass (kDa) | Mass (kDa) | Mass (kDa) | |
| 1 | 1000–736 | 74 | 1000–736 |
| 2 | 16 | 34 | 19–12 |
| 3 | - | - | 5 |
Percentage of glycosidic bonds in polysaccharidic components of EPSs (P) from F. culmorum strains (methylation analysis according to the Hakomori procedure [88].
| Ret. Time | Glycosidic Linkage | DEMFc2 | DEMFc5 | DEMFc37 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.14 | (terminal) 6-d-Hex(1→ | - | 3,4 | - |
| 12.51 | (terminal) Hex(1→(Man) | 21,5 | 17,5 | 50,4 |
| 14.40 | →2)Hex(1→ | Traces | 16,8 | 24,5 |
| 14.45 | →3)Hex I(1→ | 25,3 | 10,3 | - |
| 14.54 | →4)Hex(1→ | 53,2 | 29,0 | 5,5 |
| 14.88 | →3)Hex II(1→ | - | 3,1 | 7,2 |
| 15.10 | →6)Hex(1→ | - | 4,8 | - |
| 17.03 | →3,6)Hex(1→ | - | 15,2 | 12,3 |
Figure 14Visualization of polysaccharides containing β-glycosidic bonds (using Fluorescence Brightener 28 dye) in the ethanol precipitated EPS (EP) from cultures of F. culmorum strains: (A) DEMFc2, (B) DEMFc5, (C) DEMFc37.
Figure 15Scavenging ability (determined with the ABTS method) of the EPS obtained from cultures of three F. culmorum strains. (A). Comparison of ethanol precipitate EPS (EP), crude EPS (C), and proteolysed EPS (P) used in a concentration range of 6.25-100 µg/mL; (B). Ethanol precipitate EPS (EP) used in a concentration range of 6.25–100 µg/mL and in a range of 100–800 µg/mL. Standard deviations are shown as deviation bars (n = 9).
Scavenging ability (determined with the ABTS method) of the EPS obtained from cultures of three F. culmorum strains. comparison of ethanol precipitate EPS (EP), crude EPS (C), and proteolysed EPS (P) used in a concentration range of 6.25–100 µg/mL and ethanol precipitate EPS (EP) used in a concentration range of 6.25–100 µg/mL and in a range of 100–800 µg/mL. Data are presented as means ± Standard deviation (n = 9).
| Scavenging Ratio (%) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration (µg/mL) | DEMFc2 | DEMFc5 | DEMFc37 | Vit. C | Trolox | ||||||
| EP | C | P | EP | C | P | EP | C | P | |||
|
| 0.52 ± 0.02 | 0.50 ± 0.04 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.03 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 0.52 ± 0.01 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 20.12 ± 0.68 | 19.13 ± 0.61 |
|
| 0.63 ± 0.03 | 0.66 ± 0.04 | 0.20 ± 0.03 | 1.59 ± 0.06 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 1.15 ± 0.04 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 0.36 ± 0.04 | 24.30 ± 1.16 | 25.32 ± 0.49 |
|
| 2.50 ± 0.17 | 1.00 ± 0.06 | 0.36 ± 0.03 | 2.55 ± 0.11 | 0.69 ± 0.03 | 0.85 ± 0.05 | 1.40 ± 0.05 | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 0.40 ± 0.04 | 25.77 ± 0.64 | 26.40 ± 0.32 |
|
| 2.25 ± 0.08 | 1.20 ± 0.05 | 0.95 ± 0.04 | 2.58 ± 0.06 | 0.79 ± 0.04 | 0.96 ± 0.02 | 2.03 ± 0.09 | 0.85 ± 0.04 | 0.98 ± 0.05 | 27.40 ± 0.41 | 27.70 ± 0.65 |
|
| 2.94 ± 0.09 | 2.60 ± 0.02 | 2.20 ± 0.06 | 3.08 ± 0.02 | 1.90 ± 0.06 | 1.50 ± 0.02 | 2.99 ± 0.11 | 1.85 ± 0.09 | 1.36 ± 0.07 | 42.8 ± 0.67 | 33.90 ± 0.51 |
|
| 12.77 ± 0.75 | IS | IS | 7.68 ± 0.39 | IS | IS | 6.75 ± 0.44 | IS | IS | 63.98 ± 0.20 | 70.23 ± 1.05 |
|
| 16.85 ± 0.35 | IS | IS | 9.06 ± 0.52 | IS | IS | 9.41 ± 0.15 | IS | IS | 91.62 ± 0.39 | 91.55 ± 1.20 |
|
| 29.14 ± 1.55 | IS | IS | 18.62 ± 1.02 | IS | IS | 14.41 ± 1.21 | IS | IS | 95.35 ± 0.97 | 92.14 ± 1.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 16Scheme of fractionation of crude EPS (C) and EPS subjected to proteolysis (P) obtained from three F. culmorum strain cultures.