Literature DB >> 32001985

Cementless jumbo cups for revision of failed Furlong prosthesis. A case series.

Ahmed Salem Eid1, Ahmed Kotb1, Waleed Elshabrawy1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Revision of failed total hip arthroplasty (THA) presents great challenge to any orthopaedic surgeon especially in the presence of acetabular defects where the main goal is to achieve durable fixation of prosthetic components to bone which is the key to successful revision surgery.
METHODS: Seventeen patients (17 hips) with mean age of 52 (40-61) years had revision surgery for aseptic failure of Furlong hydroxyapatite-ceramic-coated (HAC) prosthesis using cementless jumbo cups. Patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically with mean follow-up of 3.5 years (2-6). No patient was lost to follow up.
RESULTS: All revised acetabular components showed polyethylene wear, severe metallosis, with acetabular defects IIB (4/17), and IIIA (13/17) according to Paprosky classification. The femoral component was well fixed in all cases but one patient had stem revision for femoral fracture mal-union. There was one early post-operative infection; there was no postoperative dislocation, sciatic nerve injury, periprosthetic fracture or deep venous thrombosis. At last follow-up, no progressive radiolucencies or acetabular migration was identified. The mean Harris hip score improved from 42 (24-59) pre-operatively to 85 (72-92).
CONCLUSION: Good clinical results and radiographic stability were obtained at short term follow up after acetabular revision using cementless jumbo cups, which justify its use in revision surgery even in the face of major acetabular defects. Furlong HAC femoral component gives excellent long-term survival in young and active patients with a survival rate of 94% at 18.6 years.
© 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabular revision; Arthroplasty; Furlong; Jumbo cup

Year:  2018        PMID: 32001985      PMCID: PMC6985161          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  40 in total

1.  Acetabular revision arthroplasty using so-called jumbo cementless components: an average 7-year follow-up study.

Authors:  J T Dearborn; W H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years.

Authors:  J T Dearborn; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Dealing with the deficient acetabulum in revision hip arthroplasty: the importance of implant migration and use of the jumbo cup.

Authors:  R H Emerson; W C Head
Journal:  Semin Arthroplasty       Date:  1993-01

4.  Early results of 827 trabecular metal revision shells in acetabular revision.

Authors:  Eerik T Skyttä; Antti Eskelinen; Pekka O Paavolainen; Ville M Remes
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Hydroxyapatite-ceramic-coated femoral components in young patients followed-up for 16 to 19 years: an update of a previous report.

Authors:  N N Shah; A J Edge; D W Clark
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-07

6.  Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components.

Authors:  C A Engh; P Massin; K E Suthers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results.

Authors:  C A Engh; J D Bobyn; A H Glassman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-01

8.  Revision of a cemented acetabular component to a cementless acetabular component. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study.

Authors:  J E Templeton; J J Callaghan; D D Goetz; P M Sullivan; R C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Primary total hip replacement with a Furlong fully hydroxyapatite-coated titanium alloy femoral component: Results at a minimum follow-up of 20 years.

Authors:  N Sandiford; C Doctor; S S Rajaratnam; S Ahmed; D J East; K Miles; A Butler-Manuel; J A N Shepperd
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.082

10.  The effect of middle-age body weight and physical activity on the risk of early revision hip arthroplasty: a cohort study of 1,535 individuals.

Authors:  Gunnar B Flugsrud; Lars Nordsletten; Birgitte Espehaug; Leif I Havelin; Haakon E Meyer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of jumbo cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Authors:  Qiuyuan Wang; Qi Wang; Pei Liu; Juncheng Ge; Qidong Zhang; Wanshou Guo; Weiguo Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-10-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.