Literature DB >> 17453400

The effect of middle-age body weight and physical activity on the risk of early revision hip arthroplasty: a cohort study of 1,535 individuals.

Gunnar B Flugsrud1, Lars Nordsletten, Birgitte Espehaug, Leif I Havelin, Haakon E Meyer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Overweight and a high level of physical activity are known risk factors for loosening of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to primary osteoarthritis. We wanted to investigate how these factors, together with age and sex, affect the risk of revision surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We matched data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register with information on risk factors collected at a cardiovascular screening. We identified 1,535 primary THAs in the screened cohort (930 cemented implants using well-documented cement). Of the participants included, 969 were female. Mean age at screening was 49 years, at primary THA 63 years, and 69 years at the end of follow-up. We used Cox regression analysis to estimate relative risks (RRs). Event was defined as implant revision due to aseptic loosening of cup, stem or both. Follow-up was time from primary THA to event or censoring.
RESULTS: Men were at greater risk than women of loosening of the femoral stem (RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3-3.2). Both men and women with upper-quartile body weight were at increased risk of revision due to loosening of the stem (RR 2.5 and 2.7, respectively). Men with a high level of physical activity during leisure time were at increased risk of revision due to loosening of the cup (RR 4.8, 95% CI 1.3-18). In the multivariate model with adjustment for activity, there was little association between age at primary THA and risk of revision due to loosening.
INTERPRETATION: We found that body weight and physical activity recorded long before THA affected the survival of total hip arthroplasties. Controlling for these variables weakened the association between age at primary surgery and aseptic loosening. Men had an increased risk of loosening of the femoral stem, also after controlling for lifestyle factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17453400     DOI: 10.1080/17453670610013493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  27 in total

1.  Does impact sport activity influence total hip arthroplasty durability?

Authors:  Matthieu Ollivier; Solenne Frey; Sebastien Parratte; Xavier Flecher; Jean-Noël Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Patient-oriented functional results of total femoral endoprosthetic reconstruction following oncologic resection.

Authors:  Kevin B Jones; Anthony M Griffin; Coonoor R Chandrasekar; David Biau; Antoine Babinet; Benjamin Deheshi; Robert S Bell; Robert J Grimer; Jay S Wunder; Peter C Ferguson
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  No differences in outcomes between cemented and uncemented acetabular components after 12-14 years: results from a randomized controlled trial comparing Duraloc with Charnley cups.

Authors:  Kristian Bjørgul; Wendy M Novicoff; S T Andersen; K Brevig; F Thu; M Wiig; O Ahlund
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-03-03

4.  Male gender, Charnley class C, and severity of bone defects predict the risk for aseptic loosening in the cup of ABG I hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jiri Gallo; Vitezslav Havranek; Jana Zapletalova; Jiri Lostak
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty?

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Franco M Impellizzeri; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  How active are patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty?: A systematic review.

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Franco M Impellizzeri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Patient activity after total hip arthroplasty declines with advancing age.

Authors:  Stefan Kinkel; Nicole Wollmerstedt; Jennifer A Kleinhans; Christian Hendrich; Christian Heisel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Activity following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: What should surgeons be advising?

Authors:  Scott J MacInnes; Katherine E Mackie; Andrew Titchener; Rebekah Gibbons; Allan W Wang
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-08-08

9.  Use of a Digital Protractor and a Spirit Level to Determine the Intraoperative Anteversion of Femoral Component during Cemented Hip Hemiarthroplasty: a Prospective Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Anuwat Pongkunakorn; Patanapong Palawong; Swist Chatmaitri; Nawakun Phetpangnga
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-07

10.  Cementless jumbo cups for revision of failed Furlong prosthesis. A case series.

Authors:  Ahmed Salem Eid; Ahmed Kotb; Waleed Elshabrawy
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-08-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.