| Literature DB >> 31991925 |
Hsuan Chiu1, Hui-Ju Tsai2,3,4, Jiun-Chi Huang5,6,7, Pei-Yu Wu5,7, Wei-Hao Hsu7,8, Mei-Yueh Lee6,8, Szu-Chia Chen4,5,6,7.
Abstract
Keywords: triglyceride-glucose index; microangiopathy; macroangiopathy; type 2 diabetes mellitus.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31991925 PMCID: PMC7071226 DOI: 10.3390/nu12020328
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Flowchart.
Comparison of Baseline Characteristics According to TyG index Quartile.
| Characteristics | Quartile 1 | Quartile 2 | Quartile 3 | Quartile 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (<8.7) | (≥8.7, <9.1) | (≥9.1, <9.5) | (≥9.5) | |
| TyG index | 8.3 ± 0.3 | 8.9 ± 0.1 a | 9.3 ± 0.1 ab | 10.0 ± 0.5 abc |
| Age (years) | 64.4 ± 12.1 | 64.7 ± 10.5 | 64.1 ± 11.4 | 63.1 ± 11.2 |
| Male (%) | 45.9 | 46.1 | 38.6 | 41.5 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 132.9 ± 19.6 | 134.3 ± 18.2 | 135.6 ± 17.5 | 136.8 ± 19.5 a |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 75.2 ± 10.6 | 78.1 ± 11.1 a | 78.2 ± 10.8 a | 79.8 ± 12.3 a |
| Pulse pressure (mmHg) | 57.7 ± 16.4 | 56.2 ± 14.7 | 57.4 ± 14.6 | 57.0 ± 15.3 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.8 ± 3.4 | 26.0 ± 3.6 a | 26.2 ± 3.5 a | 26.4 ± 3.6 a |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 89.4 ± 47.8 | 90.1 ± 9.6 | 92.3 ± 40.8 | 90.8 ± 9.2 |
| Laboratory parameters | ||||
| Fasting glucose (mg/dL) | 115.6 ± 30.3 | 134.6 ± 31.6 a | 154.4 ± 41.9 ab | 189.5 ± 62.6 abc |
| HbA1c (%) | 7.0 ± 1.2 | 7.3 ± 1.3 a | 7.7 ± 1.5 ab | 8.6 ± 2.0 abc |
| TG (mg/dL) | 77.0 ± 23.0 | 114.2 ± 27.4 a | 149.7 ± 38.7 ab | 278.7 ± 217.8 abc |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 172.0 ± 30.5 | 177.7 ± 29.8 a | 188.0 ± 34.7 ab | 204.9 ± 48.3 abc |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 70.7 ± 19.0 | 69.3 ± 19.3 | 67.0 ± 19.8 a | 67.6 ± 20.4 |
| Albuminuria ≥ 30 mg/g (%) | 25.4 | 30.9 | 36.6 a | 47.5 abc |
| DR (%) | 34.0 | 34.3 | 37.2 | 34.9 |
| CAD (%) | 17.9 | 16.2 | 14.5 | 18.8 |
| CVA (%) | 3.6 | 4.0 | 5.3 | 6.8 |
| ABI < 0.9 (%) | 3.4 | 4.2 | 3.0 | 5.4 |
| Medications | ||||
| ACEI and/or ARB (%) | 70.2 | 75.6 | 73.8 | 74.8 |
| Statin use (%) | 46.6 | 58. 5 a | 63.3 a | 71.2 ab |
| Fibrate use (%) | 4.7 | 8.2 | 14.6 ab | 39.0 abc |
Abbreviations: ABI = ankle-brachial index; ACEI = angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB = angiotensin II receptor blocker; CAD = coronary artery disease; CVA = cerebrovascular disease; DR = diabetic retinopathy; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin A1c; TG = triglyceride; TyG = triglyceride-glucose. The TyG index was calculated as ln (fasting triglyceride [mg/dL] × fasting glucose [mg/dL]/2); a p < 0.05 vs. quartile 1, b p < 0.05 vs. quartile 2, c p < 0.05 vs. quartile 3.
Figure 2There were significant trends for stepwise increases in albuminuria ≥ 30 mg/g (p for trend < 0.001) and cerebrovascular disease (p for trend = 0.013) corresponding to quartiles of TyG index, but not diabetic retinopathy (p for trend = 0.573), coronary artery disease (p for trend = 0.880), and peripheral artery occlusive disease (p for trend = 0.223).
Determinants of Microangiopathies Using Forward Binary Logistic Regression Analysis a.
| Microangiopathies | Multivariate a | |
|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| Albuminuria ≥ 30 mg/g b | ||
| TyG index | ||
| Quartile 1 | Reference | |
| Quartile 2 | 1.215 (0.905–1.631) | 0.196 |
| Quartile 3 | 1.424 (1.062–1.910) | 0.018 |
| Quartile 4 | 1.948 (1.437–2.642) | <0.001 |
| Pulse pressure (per 10 mm Hg) | 1.171(1.096–1.251) | <0.001 |
| Body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 | 1.370 (1.115–1.683) | 0.003 |
| HbA1c (per 1%) | 1.172 (1.099–1.249) | <0.001 |
| eGFR (per 10 mL/min/1.73 m2) | 0.903(0.856–0.952) | <0.001 |
| DR c | ||
| Pulse pressure (per 10 mm Hg) | 1.139(1.068–1.215) | <0.001 |
| HbA1c (per 1%) | 1.106 (1.040–1.176) | 0.001 |
| Cholesterol (per 1 mg/dL) | 0.997 (0.995–1.000) | 0.044 |
| eGFR (per 10 mL/min/1.73 m2) | 0.882(0.838–0.929) | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; DR = diabetic retinopathy; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin A1c; OR = odds ratio; TG =triglyceride; a Covariates in the multivariate model included quartiles of TyG index, age, sex, pulse pressure, body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2, waist circumference, HbA1c, total cholesterol, eGFR, and statin or fibrate use. b Global p value estimated by Hosmer and Lemeshow Goodness-of-Fit Test = 0.810. c Global p value estimated by Hosmer and Lemeshow Goodness-of-Fit Test = 0.556.
Determinants of Macroangiopathies Using Forwad Binary Logistic Regression Analysisa.
| Macroangiopathies | Multivariate a | |
|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| CAD b | ||
| Age (per 1 year) | 1.062 (1.046–1.077) | <0.001 |
| Body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 | 1.380 (1.062–1.793) | 0.016 |
| Cholesterol (per 1 mg/dL) | 0.996 (0.992–0.999) | 0.020 |
| eGFR (per 10 mL/min/1.73 m2) | 0.917 (0.851–0.989) | 0.024 |
| CVA c | ||
| TyG index | ||
| Quartile 1 | Reference | |
| Quartile 2 | 1.127 (0.585–2.171) | 0.720 |
| Quartile 3 | 1.618 (0.862–3.038) | 0.134 |
| Quartile 4 | 2.264 (1.243–4.122) | 0.008 |
| Age (per 1 year) | 1.059 (1.036–1.082) | <0.001 |
| Male (vs female) | 1.686 (1.101–2.581) | 0.016 |
| ABI < 0.9 d | ||
| Age (per 1 year) | 1.048 (1.019–1.077) | 0.001 |
| eGFR (per 10 mL/min/1.73 m2) | 0.702 (0.607–0.811) | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: ABI = ankle-brachial index; CAD = coronary artery disease; CI = confidence interval; CVA = cerebrovascular disease; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; OR = odds ratio; a Covariates in the multivariate model included quartiles of TyG index, age, sex, pulse pressure, body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2, waist circumference, HbA1c, total cholesterol, eGFR, and statin or fibrate use. b Global p value estimated by Hosmer and Lemeshow Goodness-of-Fit Test = 0.558. c Global p value estimated by Hosmer and Lemeshow Goodness-of-Fit Test = 0.297. d Global p value estimated by Hosmer and Lemeshow Goodness-of-Fit Test = 0.488.