| Literature DB >> 27633375 |
Eun Young Lee1, Hae Kyung Yang1, Joonyub Lee1, Borami Kang1, Yeoree Yang1, Seung-Hwan Lee1, Seung-Hyun Ko2, Yu-Bae Ahn2, Bong Yun Cha1, Kun-Ho Yoon1,3, Jae Hyoung Cho4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance is one of the most important contributing factors to cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to investigate the association between coronary artery stenosis (CAS) and triglyceride glucose index (TyG index), a simple insulin resistance marker, in asymptomatic subjects with type 2 diabetes.Entities:
Keywords: Atherosclerosis; Coronary; TyG index; Type 2 diabetes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27633375 PMCID: PMC5024477 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-016-0324-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Baseline characteristics of study population according to the tertiles of TyG index
| Lowest tertile ( | Mid tertile ( | Highest tertile ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 65.4 ± 8.6 | 64.2 ± 9.3 | 62.0 ± 10.2*† | <0.001 |
| Male (%) | 180 (61.4) | 172 (58.1) | 171 (57.2) | 0.295 |
| Duration of diabetes (year) | 12.3 ± 9.3 | 12.2 ± 9.6 | 11.8 ± 9.3 | 0.779 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.2 ± 3.1 | 24.6 ± 3.0* | 24.9 ± 3.3* | <0.001 |
| WC (cm) | 85.6 ± 8.5 | 89.8 ± 11.3* | 89.8 ± 8.5* | 0.005 |
| WHR (cm) | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1* | 0.010 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 123.7 ± 14.5 | 126.6 ± 13.3 | 127.0 ± 15.8* | 0.016 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 73.2 ± 9.7 | 74.8 ± 9.5 | 77.0 ± 9.7*† | <0.001 |
| TyG index | 8.2 ± 0.3 | 8.9 ± 0.2* | 9.7 ± 0.4*† | <0.001 |
| HOMA-IR | 2.1 (1.3–3.7) | 3.9 (2.1–7.1) * | 5.2 (3.2–10.1) *† | <0.001 |
| FPG (mg/dL) | 117.1 ± 28.8 | 138.8 ± 31.6* | 188.4 ± 71.1*† | <0.001 |
| PPG (mg/dL) | 185.6 ± 65.8 | 205.6 ± 76.0* | 245.6 ± 83.6*† | <0.001 |
| HbA1c (%) | 7.4 ± 1.8 | 7.7 ± 1.9 | 8.8 ± 2.0*† | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 155.5 ± 30.7 | 165.9 ± 32.8* | 182.9 ± 42.5*† | <0.001 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 68 (54–83) | 115 (94–138)* | 188 (145–253) *† | <0.001 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 52.0 ± 13.4 | 46.5 ± 10.2* | 44.2 ± 10.4* | <0.001 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 89.9 ± 27.4 | 96.1 ± 29.7 | 97.4 ± 37.7* | 0.009 |
| Estimated GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 95.7 ± 24.6 | 93.8 ± 25.1 | 93.1 ± 24.2 | 0.125 |
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | 4.9 ± 1.3 | 5.0 ± 1.4 | 5.2 ± 1.6 | 0.046 |
| Insulin, n (%) | 59 (20.1) | 66 (22.3) | 83 (27.8) | 0.028 |
| Sulfonylurea, n (%) | 117 (39.9) | 127 (42.9) | 109 (36.5) | 0.383 |
| Meglitinide, n (%) | 39 (13.3) | 33 (11.1) | 35 (11.7) | 0.551 |
| Metformin, n (%) | 161 (54.9) | 193 (65.3) | 202 (67.6) | 0.002 |
| Thiazolidinedione, n (%) | 8 (2.7) | 8 (2.7) | 12 (4.0) | 0.370 |
| α-glucosidase inhibitor, n (%) | 69 (23.5) | 63 (21.3) | 36 (12.0) | <0.001 |
| DPP-IV inhibitor, n (%) | 19 (6.5) | 25 (8.4) | 22 (7.4) | 0.689 |
| Antiplatelet agent, n (%) | 192 (66.2) | 173 (58.6) | 153 (51.7) | <0.001 |
| Statin, n (%) | 151 (51.5) | 176 (59.5) | 138 (53.8) | 0.580 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD, median (interquartile range), or N (%). ACR, albumin to creatinine ratio; BMI body mass index, DBP diastolic blood pressure, DPP-IV dipeptidyl peptidase IV, FPG fasting plasma glucose, GFR glomerular filtration rate, HDL high density lipoprotein, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment – insulin resistance, LDL low density lipoprotein, PPG postprandial plasma glucose, SBP systolic blood pressure, WC waist circumference, WHR waist to hip ratio. * vs. lowest tertile, † vs. mid tertile
Fig. 1Correlation between TyG index and HOMA-IR after adjustment for age and sex
Multiple regression analysis for coronary artery stenosis
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TyG index tertile | OR (95 % CI) |
| OR (95 % CI) |
| OR (95 % CI) |
| OR (95 % CI) |
|
| Lowest | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | ||||
| Mid | 2.36 (1.370–4.078) | 0.002 | 2.28 (1.313–3.967) | 0.003 | 1.71 (0.729–3.991) | 0.219 | 1.63 (0.674–3.924) | 0.279 |
| Highest | 2.50 (1.432–4.348) | 0.001 | 2.54 (1.418–4.544) | 0.002 | 3.42 (1.519–7.709) | 0.003 | 3.19 (1.371–7.424) | 0.007 |
| P for trend | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.006 | ||||
Model 1: adjusted for age and sex
Model 2: model + adjusted for HbA1c and duration of diabetes
Model 3: model 2 + adjusted for systolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, estimated GFR, uric acid and smoking
Model 4: model 3 + adjusted for insulin, oral hypoglycemic agents, antiplatelet agents, antihypertensive medication, and statin
CI confidence interval, GFR glomerular filtration rate, OR odds ratio
Fig. 2Subgroup analysis for coronary artery stenosis. Odds ratio of the highest tertile of TyG index was presented in comparison with the odds ratio of the lowest tertile of TyG index