| Literature DB >> 31296225 |
Alessandra da Silva1, Ana Paula Silva Caldas2, Helen Hermana Miranda Hermsdorff2, Ângela Cristine Bersch-Ferreira3, Camila Ragne Torreglosa3, Bernardete Weber3, Josefina Bressan2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The triglyceride-glucose index (TyG index) is a tool for insulin resistance evaluation, however, little is known about its association with coronary artery disease (CAD), which is the major cardiovascular death cause, and what factors may be associated with TyG index.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiovascular diseases; Coronary artery disease; Risk factors; Secondary care; Triglyceride-glucose index
Year: 2019 PMID: 31296225 PMCID: PMC6625050 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-019-0893-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Socio-demographic, anthropometric, clinical and food consumption characteristics of patients in secondary care for cardiovascular diseases according to TyG index tertiles
| Variables | TyG index tertiles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (lowest) (n = 777) | T2 (n = 777) | 3 (highest) (n = 776) | ||
| TyG index | 8.3 ± 0.3a | 8.9 ± 0.1b | 9.7 ± 0.5c | < |
| Male, sex [%] | 468 [34.5] | 424 [31.2] | 466 [34.3] | 0.942 |
| Age (years) | 63.7 ± 8.8a | 63.4 ± 8.8a | 62.4 ± 9.2b |
|
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.5 ± 4.6a | 29.4 ± 5.0b | 30.3 ± 4.9c | < |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 95.9 ± 11.9a | 100.2 ± 11.9b | 103.2 ± 11.6c | < |
| Waist-to-height ratio | 0.6 ± 0.1a | 0.6 ± 0.1b | 0.6 ± 0.1c | < |
| VAI | 1.4 ± 0.7a | 2.5 ± 0.9b | 5.1 ± 4.3c | < |
| SBP (mmHg) | 129.0 ± 19.7a | 131.8 ± 19.4b | 131.4 ± 19.4b | < |
| DBP (mmHg) | 77.9 ± 12.5a | 79.5 ± 12.4b | 80.4 ± 12.6b | < |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 155.1 ± 39.0a | 170.3 ± 43.3b | 185.3 ± 49.4c | < |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 47.2 ± 14.3a | 43.0 ± 11.3b | 39.9 ± 9.8c | < |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 89.3 ± 33.8a | 98.6 ± 38.8b | 97.5 ± 42.5b | < |
| LDL-C/HDL-C ratio | 2.0 ± 0.9a | 2.4 ± 0.9b | 2.6 ± 1.2b | < |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 89.9 ± 21.7a | 145.0 ± 32.2b | 258.2 ± 154.2c | < |
| Glycemia (mg/dl) | 95.8 ± 15.6a | 108.0 ± 24.5b | 151.7 ± 67.6c | < |
| Smoking [%] | 475 [33.2] | 453 [31.7] | 501 [35.1] | 0.146 |
| Sedentary [%] | 479 [32.2]a | 493 [33.1]a | 516 [34.7]b |
|
| Dyslipidemic [%] | 571 [31.4]a | 589 [32.3]a | 661 [36.3]b | < |
| Diabetics [%] | 231 [22.5]a | 291 [28.4]b | 504 [49.1]c | < |
| Hypertensive [%] | 676 [32.1]a | 709 [33.7]b | 719 [34.2]b | < |
| Use of hypoglycemic agents [%] | 205 [21.3]a | 280 [29.1]b | 476 [49.5]c | < |
| Use of lipid-lowing agents [%] | 660 [32.9] | 679 [33.8] | 669 [33.3] | 0.468 |
| Family history of CAD [%] | 489 [62.9] | 510 [65.8] | 517 [67.1] | 0.089 |
| Calories (Kcal) | 1437.5 ± 526.0 | 1401.2 ± 497.1 | 1429.3 ± 566.4 | 0.551 |
| Carbohydrates (g) | 189.1 ± 39.1a | 188.5 ± 35.6a | 183.8 ± 39.1b |
|
| Proteins (g) | 70.5 ± 22.6 | 69.60 ± 20.6 | 71.5 ± 22.5 | 0.329 |
| Lipids (g) | 43.6 ± 12.9a | 44.7 ± 11.9ab | 45.7 ± 12.8b |
|
Data are mean ± SD (standard deviation) or number [%]. P-values based in Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U for quantitative variables and Chi square of linear trend for categorical variables
Different letters show presence of difference and equal letters show the absence of differences
Italic values show the presence of statistic significance
DAP diastolic blood pressure, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein, TyG index triglyceride-glucose index, SBP systolic blood pressure, VAI visceral adiposity index
Association between TyG index (dependent variable) with energy and macronutrient consumption in patients with heart disease
| Consumption (% energy) | Model 1: TyG index tertiles | Model 2: TyG index tertiles | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (lowest) | 2 | 3 (highest) | 1 (lowest) | 2 | 3 (highest) | |
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||||
| Energy | 0.9 (0.9–1.0) | 0.9 (0.9–1.0) | 0.9 (0.9–1.0) | 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | ||
| Carbohydrates (%) | ||||||
| 45–65 | 1 (Ref.) | 1 (Ref.) | ||||
| < 45 | 0.9 (0.7–1.3) | 1.1 (0.9–1.4) | 0.9 (0.7–1.3) | 1.1 (0.8–1.4) | ||
| > 65 | 0.7 (0.5–1.1) | 0.8 (0.5–1.1) | ||||
| Proteins (%) | ||||||
| 15–20 | 1 (Ref.) | 1 (Ref.) | 1 (Ref.) | 1 (Ref.) | ||
| < 15 | 0.9 (0.7–1.3) | 0.9 (0.7–1.3) | 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | 1.0 (0.7–1.4) | ||
| > 20 | 0.9 (0.8–1.2) | 1.2 (0.9–1.4) | 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | 1.2 (0.9–1.5) | ||
| Lipids (%) | ||||||
| 25–35 | 1 (Ref.) | 1 (Ref.) | ||||
| < 25 | 0.8 (0.6–1.0) | |||||
| > 35 | 0.8 (0.6–1.2) | 0.9 (0.7–1.2) | 0.8 (0.6–1.2) | 0.8 (0.6–1.1) | ||
Data are odds ratio (95% CI) based in multinomial logistic regression
Italic values show the presence of statistic significance
Model 1: crude
Model 2: adjusted by sex, age, use of hypoglycemic, antihypertensive, anticoagulant and lipid-lowing agents
Fig. 1Prevalence of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) in the phases a asymptomatic, b symptomatic and c treated according to TyG index tertiles
Association of TyG index with the different phases of coronary artery disease
| Coronary artery disease (n = 1966) | TyG index tertiles | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (lowest) | 2 | 3 (highest) | |
| PR (95% CI) | |||
| Asymptomatic (n = 380) | |||
| Model 1 | Ref. | 0.94 (0.75–1.18) | 0.97 (0.78–1.22) |
| Model 2 | Ref. | 0.93 (0.74–1.17) | 0.98 (0.79–1.23) |
| Model 3 | Ref. | 0.93 (0.74–1.17) | 0.98 (0.78–1.17) |
| Symptomatic (n = 844) | |||
| Model 1 | Ref. | 1.09 (0.95–1.25) | |
| Model 2 | Ref. | 1.09 (0.95–1.25) | |
| Model 3 | Ref. | 1.08 (0.94–1.24) | |
| Treated (n = 1607) | |||
| Model 1 | Ref. | 1.07 (1.01–1.14) | 1.05 (0.98–1.13) |
| Model 2 | Ref. | 1.07 (1.01–1.15) | 1.05 (0.98–1.12) |
| Model 3 | Ref. | 1.05 (0.99–1.13) | 1.03 (0.97–1.10) |
Data are prevalence ratio (95% CI) based in Poisson regression
Italic values show the presence of statistic significance
Model 1: crude
Model 2: adjusted by sex and age
Model 3: adjusted by model 2, use of hypoglycemic, antihypertensive, anticoagulant, lipid-lowing agents, carbohydrate and lipids intake, stroke, peripheral artery disease, and the presence of any other stage of the disease