| Literature DB >> 31941911 |
Oliver Beuing1, Anja Lenz2, Aneta Donitza2, Mathias Becker2, Steffen Serowy2, Martin Skalej2.
Abstract
Intracranial stents have expanded endovascular therapy options for intracranial aneurysms. The braided Accero stent is available for clinical use since May 2015. To date, no clinical reports on the stent are available. Purpose of this study was the evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the Accero stent in stent-assisted coiling. All patients, in whom implantation of the stent was performed, were included. Primary endpoints were good clinical outcome (mRS ≤ 2) and aneurysm occlusion grades 1 and 2 (Raymond Roy Occlusion Classification). Secondary endpoints were procedural and device-related complications with permanent disability or death, complications in the course, and the recanalization rate. Between September 2015 and August 2018, thirty-four aneurysms were treated with stent-assisted coiling using the Accero. Sixteen aneurysms were untreated, four of these were ruptured. Mild neurological complications occurred in 2/34 (5.9%) treatments. Two stent occlusions occurred during follow-up. No patient had a poor procedure- or device-related outcome. After an average of 15 months of follow-up, 28/30 aneurysms were completely or near-completely occluded. The Accero stent proved to be safe and effective in the treatment of broad-based intracranial aneurysms. The complication rate and the rate of successful aneurysm occlusions are similar to those of other stents.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31941911 PMCID: PMC6962445 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-57102-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1High-resolution volume-of-interest (VOI) imaging of two implanted Accero stents. (A) Thick-slab maximum intensity projection after multiplanar reconstruction after deployment of the stent in the left PICA. The stent has opened completely and shows a complete wall-apposition. The metal artifacts caused by the previous coiling do not affect the assessability of the stent lumen. (B) Incomplete opening at the distal end of the stent (white arrow). Note the intended bulging of the stent into the aneurysmal lumen (white arrowhead), which, however, substantially increased by trying to reach the distal end of the stent with a balloon catheter. However, the bulging was not sufficient to cover the ostium sufficiently for coiling, so that a second stent was implanted.
Morphological aneurysm characteristics.
| All (n = 34) | Pretreated (n = 18) | Untreated (n = 16) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sizea (mm) | Mean/SD | 5.1 (±4.8) | 3.3* (±1.2) | 7.0* (±6.4) |
| Median | 3, 9 | 3.1 | 5.2 | |
| Range | 1.6–28.7 | 1.6– | 2.6–28.7 | |
| Neck width (mm) | Mean/SD | 4.0 (±1.4) | 3.6* (±1.2) | 4.6* (±1.6) |
| Median | 4.0 | 3.6 | 4.3 | |
| Range | 1.8–7.1 | 1.8–6.0 | 2.1–7.1 | |
| Max. widthb (mm) | Mean/SD | 6.2 (±4.6) | 4.7* (±1.8) | 8.0* (±6.1) |
| Median | 4.7 | 4.4 | 6.8 | |
| Range | 1.8–27.4 | 1.8–8.0 | 2.7–27.4 | |
| Heightc (mm) | Mean/SD | 5.0 (±4.8) | 3.4* (±1.2) | 6.9* (±6.4) |
| Median | 3.9 | 3.1 | 5.2 | |
| Range | 1.6–28.7 | 1.6–5.7 | 2.6–28.7 | |
| Aspect Ratiod | Mean/SD | 1.21 (±0.67) | 1.02 (±0.46) | 1.42 (± 0.81) |
| Median | 1.06 | 0.99 | 1.19 | |
| Range | 0.42–4.03 | 0.42–2.01 | 0.70–4.03 | |
| Dome-to-Neck Ratio | Mean/SD | 1.47 (±0.56) | 1.31 (±0.32) | 1.64 (±0.71) |
| Median | 1.33 | 1.26 | 1.43 | |
| Range | 0.72–3.85 | 0.72–1.80 | 0.97–3.85 | |
| Vessel Diameter proximal (mm) | Mean/SD | 2.7 (±0.60) | 2.6 (±0.60) | 2.8 (±0.63) |
| Median | 2, 6 | 2, 5 | 2.8 | |
| Range | 1.8–4.0 | 1.8–4.0 | 1.9–4.0 | |
| Vessel Diameter distal (mm) | Mean/SD | 2.2 (±0.51) | 2.2 (±0.50) | 2.1 (±0.51) |
| Median | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.0 | |
| Range | 1.6–3.7 | 1.7–3.5 | 1.6–3.7 | |
aMeasured along the axis from the center of the neck plane to the farthest point on the aneurysm dome[31]. bMaximum transverse diameter perpendicular to the long axis. cMaximum perpendicular distance from dome to neck plane. Calculated by dividing height by neck width. *Significant (p < 0.05) difference between the untreated and pretreated group. As expected, the untreated aneurysms were significantly larger than the reperfused ones. However, aspect ratios (AR) and dome-to-neck ratios (DNR) as well as the vessel diameters didn’t differ significantly.
Figure 2Initial treatment result and follow-up after SAC of an aneurysm at the pericallosal artery with the jailing technique. (A) Working projection with microcatheters immediately proximal to the aneurysm. The aneurysm develops from the apex of a sharp curve. A little further distally again sharp bend of the vessel. (B) Result immediately after the intervention. Still little inflow into the aneurysm sac (RROG 3, white arrows). Note the slightly different vascular anatomy after stenting. (C) In the control-DSA after 6 months complete aneurysm occlusion (RROG 1). Note the discreet intimal hyperplasia in the region of the aneurysm ostium (white arrowhead).
Initial and follow-up treatment results.
| n = 30 | Follow-Up Result | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RR1 | RR2 | RR3 | ||
| RR1 | 14 | 2 | 0 | |
| RR2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | |
| RR3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | |
| Sum: | 21 (70.0%) | 7 (23.3%) | 2 (6.7%) | |