Literature DB >> 33407114

A review of deep learning applications for genomic selection.

Osval Antonio Montesinos-López1, Abelardo Montesinos-López2, Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez3, José Alberto Barrón-López4, Johannes W R Martini5, Silvia Berenice Fajardo-Flores1, Laura S Gaytan-Lugo6, Pedro C Santana-Mancilla1, José Crossa7,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several conventional genomic Bayesian (or no Bayesian) prediction methods have been proposed including the standard additive genetic effect model for which the variance components are estimated with mixed model equations. In recent years, deep learning (DL) methods have been considered in the context of genomic prediction. The DL methods are nonparametric models providing flexibility to adapt to complicated associations between data and output with the ability to adapt to very complex patterns. MAIN BODY: We review the applications of deep learning (DL) methods in genomic selection (GS) to obtain a meta-picture of GS performance and highlight how these tools can help solve challenging plant breeding problems. We also provide general guidance for the effective use of DL methods including the fundamentals of DL and the requirements for its appropriate use. We discuss the pros and cons of this technique compared to traditional genomic prediction approaches as well as the current trends in DL applications.
CONCLUSIONS: The main requirement for using DL is the quality and sufficiently large training data. Although, based on current literature GS in plant and animal breeding we did not find clear superiority of DL in terms of prediction power compared to conventional genome based prediction models. Nevertheless, there are clear evidences that DL algorithms capture nonlinear patterns more efficiently than conventional genome based. Deep learning algorithms are able to integrate data from different sources as is usually needed in GS assisted breeding and it shows the ability for improving prediction accuracy for large plant breeding data. It is important to apply DL to large training-testing data sets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Genomic selection; Genomic trends; Plant breeding

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33407114      PMCID: PMC7789712          DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-07319-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


  57 in total

1.  Accelerating the domestication of forest trees in a changing world.

Authors:  Antoine Harfouche; Richard Meilan; Matias Kirst; Michele Morgante; Wout Boerjan; Maurizio Sabatti; Giuseppe Scarascia Mugnozza
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 18.313

2.  Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning.

Authors:  Babak Alipanahi; Andrew Delong; Matthew T Weirauch; Brendan J Frey
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Deep Kernel and Deep Learning for Genome-Based Prediction of Single Traits in Multienvironment Breeding Trials.

Authors:  José Crossa; Johannes W R Martini; Daniel Gianola; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Diego Jarquin; Philomin Juliana; Osval Montesinos-López; Jaime Cuevas
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Genomic Prediction of Gene Bank Wheat Landraces.

Authors:  José Crossa; Diego Jarquín; Jorge Franco; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Juan Burgueño; Carolina Saint-Pierre; Prashant Vikram; Carolina Sansaloni; Cesar Petroli; Deniz Akdemir; Clay Sneller; Matthew Reynolds; Maria Tattaris; Thomas Payne; Carlos Guzman; Roberto J Peña; Peter Wenzl; Sukhwinder Singh
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  DeepCpG: accurate prediction of single-cell DNA methylation states using deep learning.

Authors:  Christof Angermueller; Heather J Lee; Wolf Reik; Oliver Stegle
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  Phenotypic Data from Inbred Parents Can Improve Genomic Prediction in Pearl Millet Hybrids.

Authors:  Zhikai Liang; Shashi K Gupta; Cheng-Ting Yeh; Yang Zhang; Daniel W Ngu; Ramesh Kumar; Hemant T Patil; Kanulal D Mungra; Dev Vart Yadav; Abhishek Rathore; Rakesh K Srivastava; Rajeev Gupta; Jinliang Yang; Rajeev K Varshney; Patrick S Schnable; James C Schnable
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  DeepCount: In-Field Automatic Quantification of Wheat Spikes Using Simple Linear Iterative Clustering and Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Pouria Sadeghi-Tehran; Nicolas Virlet; Eva M Ampe; Piet Reyns; Malcolm J Hawkesford
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Predicting yield performance of parents in plant breeding: A neural collaborative filtering approach.

Authors:  Saeed Khaki; Zahra Khalilzadeh; Lizhi Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Portfolio optimization for seed selection in diverse weather scenarios.

Authors:  Oskar Marko; Sanja Brdar; Marko Panić; Isidora Šašić; Danica Despotović; Milivoje Knežević; Vladimir Crnojević
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  21 in total

1.  Choosing the right tool: Leveraging of plant genetic resources in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) benefits from selection of a suitable genomic prediction model.

Authors:  Marcel O Berkner; Albert W Schulthess; Yusheng Zhao; Yong Jiang; Markus Oppermann; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 5.574

2.  Using machine learning to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction of reproduction traits in pigs.

Authors:  Xue Wang; Shaolei Shi; Guijiang Wang; Wenxue Luo; Xia Wei; Ao Qiu; Fei Luo; Xiangdong Ding
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-17

3.  NeuralLasso: Neural Networks Meet Lasso in Genomic Prediction.

Authors:  Boby Mathew; Andreas Hauptmann; Jens Léon; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 4.  Accounting for Correlation Between Traits in Genomic Prediction.

Authors:  Osval Antonio Montesinos-López; Abelardo Montesinos-López; Brandon A Mosqueda-Gonzalez; José Cricelio Montesinos-López; José Crossa
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

5.  Genome-Enabled Prediction Methods Based on Machine Learning.

Authors:  Edgar L Reinoso-Peláez; Daniel Gianola; Oscar González-Recio
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  Automated Machine Learning: A Case Study of Genomic "Image-Based" Prediction in Maize Hybrids.

Authors:  Giovanni Galli; Felipe Sabadin; Rafael Massahiro Yassue; Cassia Galves; Humberto Fanelli Carvalho; Jose Crossa; Osval Antonio Montesinos-López; Roberto Fritsche-Neto
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  GPTransformer: A Transformer-Based Deep Learning Method for Predicting Fusarium Related Traits in Barley.

Authors:  Sheikh Jubair; James R Tucker; Nathan Henderson; Colin W Hiebert; Ana Badea; Michael Domaratzki; W G Dilantha Fernando
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Rootstock-Mediated Genetic Variance in Cadmium Uptake by Juvenile Cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) Genotypes, and Its Effect on Growth and Physiology.

Authors:  Jessica Fernández-Paz; Andrés J Cortés; Camila A Hernández-Varela; Maria Sara Mejía-de-Tafur; Caren Rodriguez-Medina; Virupax C Baligar
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Crop Improvement: Now and Beyond.

Authors:  Pierre Sourdille; Pierre Devaux
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-10

Review 10.  Harnessing Crop Wild Diversity for Climate Change Adaptation.

Authors:  Andrés J Cortés; Felipe López-Hernández
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.