Literature DB >> 35451775

Overview of Genomic Prediction Methods and the Associated Assumptions on the Variance of Marker Effect, and on the Architecture of the Target Trait.

Réka Howard1, Diego Jarquin2, José Crossa3.   

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) is a methodology that revolutionized the process of breeding improved genetic materials in plant and animal breeding programs. It uses predicted genomic values of the potential of untested/unobserved genotypes as surrogates of phenotypes during the selection process. Such that the predicted genomic values are obtained using exclusively the marker profiles of the untested genotypes, and these potentially can be used by breeders for screening the genotypes to be advanced in the breeding pipeline, to identify potential parents for next improvement cycles, or to find optimal crosses for targeting genotypes among others. Conceptually, GS initially requires a set of genotypes with both molecular marker information and phenotypic data for model calibration and then the performance of untested genotypes is predicted using their marker profiles only. Hence, it is expected that breeders would look at these values in order to conduct selections. Even though the concept of GS seems trivial, due to the high dimensional nature of the data delivered from modern sequencing technologies where the number of molecular markers (p) excess by far the number of data points available for model fitting (n; p ≫ n) a complete renovated set of prediction models was needed to cope with this challenge. In this chapter, we provide a conceptual framework for comparing statistical models to overcome the "large p, small n problem." Given the very large diversity of GS models only the most popular are presented here; mainly we focused on linear regression-based models and nonparametric models that predict the genetic estimated breeding values (GEBV) in a single environment considering a single trait only, mainly in the context of plant breeding.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genomic estimate of breeding values; Genomic selection; Prediction models; “large p, small n problem”

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35451775     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2205-6_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  26 in total

1.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model.

Authors:  C R Henderson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Commercial application of marker- and gene-assisted selection in livestock: strategies and lessons.

Authors:  J C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Genomic selection in a commercial winter wheat population.

Authors:  Sang He; Albert Wilhelm Schulthess; Vilson Mirdita; Yusheng Zhao; Viktor Korzun; Reiner Bothe; Erhard Ebmeyer; Jochen C Reif; Yong Jiang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values.

Authors:  D Habier; R L Fernando; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The use marker alleles for the introgression of linked quantitative alleles.

Authors:  M Soller; J Plotkin-Hazan
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Reliability of genomic predictions across multiple populations.

Authors:  A P W de Roos; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Whole-genome regression and prediction methods applied to plant and animal breeding.

Authors:  Gustavo de Los Campos; John M Hickey; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Hans D Daetwyler; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Persistence of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values over generations in layer chickens.

Authors:  Anna Wolc; Jesus Arango; Petek Settar; Janet E Fulton; Neil P O'Sullivan; Rudolf Preisinger; David Habier; Rohan Fernando; Dorian J Garrick; Jack C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Genomic selection accuracies within and between environments and small breeding groups in white spruce.

Authors:  Jean Beaulieu; Trevor K Doerksen; John MacKay; André Rainville; Jean Bousquet
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.