Literature DB >> 35451779

Genome and Environment Based Prediction Models and Methods of Complex Traits Incorporating Genotype × Environment Interaction.

José Crossa1,2, Osval Antonio Montesinos-López3, Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez2, Germano Costa-Neto4, Roberto Fritsche-Neto4, Rodomiro Ortiz5, Johannes W R Martini1, Morten Lillemo6, Abelardo Montesinos-López7, Diego Jarquin8, Flavio Breseghello9, Jaime Cuevas10, Renaud Rincent11.   

Abstract

Genomic-enabled prediction models are of paramount importance for the successful implementation of genomic selection (GS) based on breeding values. As opposed to animal breeding, plant breeding includes extensive multienvironment and multiyear field trial data. Hence, genomic-enabled prediction models should include genotype × environment (G × E) interaction, which most of the time increases the prediction performance when the response of lines are different from environment to environment. In this chapter, we describe a historical timeline since 2012 related to advances of the GS models that take into account G × E interaction. We describe theoretical and practical aspects of those GS models, including the gains in prediction performance when including G × E structures for both complex continuous and categorical scale traits. Then, we detailed and explained the main G × E genomic prediction models for complex traits measured in continuous and noncontinuous (categorical) scale. Related to G × E interaction models this review also examine the analyses of the information generated with high-throughput phenotype data (phenomic) and the joint analyses of multitrait and multienvironment field trial data that is also employed in the general assessment of multitrait G × E interaction. The inclusion of nongenomic data in increasing the accuracy and biological reliability of the G × E approach is also outlined. We show the recent advances in large-scale envirotyping (enviromics), and how the use of mechanistic computational modeling can derive the crop growth and development aspects useful for predicting phenotypes and explaining G × E.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genome-enabled prediction; Genomic selection; Models with G × E interaction; Plant breeding

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35451779     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2205-6_9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  61 in total

1.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Systems of Mating. I. the Biometric Relations between Parent and Offspring.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1921-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree.

Authors:  Gustavo de los Campos; Hugo Naya; Daniel Gianola; José Crossa; Andrés Legarra; Eduardo Manfredi; Kent Weigel; José Miguel Cotes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Integrating environmental covariates and crop modeling into the genomic selection framework to predict genotype by environment interactions.

Authors:  Nicolas Heslot; Deniz Akdemir; Mark E Sorrells; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 5.  Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: Methods, Models, and Perspectives.

Authors:  José Crossa; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Jaime Cuevas; Osval Montesinos-López; Diego Jarquín; Gustavo de Los Campos; Juan Burgueño; Juan M González-Camacho; Sergio Pérez-Elizalde; Yoseph Beyene; Susanne Dreisigacker; Ravi Singh; Xuecai Zhang; Manje Gowda; Manish Roorkiwal; Jessica Rutkoski; Rajeev K Varshney
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 18.313

6.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers.

Authors:  José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Paulino Pérez; Daniel Gianola; Juan Burgueño; José Luis Araus; Dan Makumbi; Ravi P Singh; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jianbing Yan; Vivi Arief; Marianne Banziger; Hans-Joachim Braun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Accuracy of genotypic value predictions for marker-based selection in biparental plant populations.

Authors:  Robenzon E Lorenzana; Rex Bernardo
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Comparison between linear and non-parametric regression models for genome-enabled prediction in wheat.

Authors:  Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Daniel Gianola; Juan Manuel González-Camacho; José Crossa; Yann Manès; Susanne Dreisigacker
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Genomic prediction in maize breeding populations with genotyping-by-sequencing.

Authors:  José Crossa; Yoseph Beyene; Semagn Kassa; Paulino Pérez; John M Hickey; Charles Chen; Gustavo de los Campos; Juan Burgueño; Vanessa S Windhausen; Ed Buckler; Jean-Luc Jannink; Marco A Lopez Cruz; Raman Babu
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Genomic prediction in CIMMYT maize and wheat breeding programs.

Authors:  J Crossa; P Pérez; J Hickey; J Burgueño; L Ornella; J Cerón-Rojas; X Zhang; S Dreisigacker; R Babu; Y Li; D Bonnett; K Mathews
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.