Literature DB >> 31847762

Fitness consequences of a non-recombining sex-ratio drive chromosome can explain its prevalence in the wild.

Kelly A Dyer1, David W Hall1.   

Abstract

Understanding the pleiotropic consequences of gene drive systems on host fitness is essential to predict their spread through a host population. Here, we study sex-ratio (SR) X-chromosome drive in the fly Drosophila recens, where SR causes the death of Y-bearing sperm in male carriers. SR males only sire daughters, which all carry SR, thus giving the chromosome a transmission advantage. The prevalence of the SR chromosome appears stable, suggesting pleiotropic costs. It was previously shown that females homozygous for SR are sterile, and here, we test for additional fitness costs of SR. We found that females heterozygous for SR have reduced fecundity and that male SR carriers have reduced fertility in conditions of sperm competition. We then use our fitness estimates to parametrize theoretical models of SR drive and show that the decrease in fecundity and sperm competition performance can account for the observed prevalence of SR in natural populations. In addition, we found that the expected equilibrium frequency of the SR chromosome is particularly sensitive to the degree of multiple mating and performance in sperm competition. Together, our data suggest that the mating system of the organism should be carefully considered during the development of gene drive systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fecundity; gene drive; longevity; meiotic drive; polyandry; sperm competition

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31847762      PMCID: PMC6939924          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  35 in total

1.  Population dynamics under parasitic sex ratio distortion.

Authors:  M J Hatcher; D E Taneyhill; A M Dunn; C Tofts
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Site-specific selfish genes as tools for the control and genetic engineering of natural populations.

Authors:  Austin Burt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Fitness effects of X chromosome drive in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni.

Authors:  G S Wilkinson; P M Johns; E S Kelleher; M L Muscedere; A Lorsong
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 4.  Selfish genetic elements, genetic conflict, and evolutionary innovation.

Authors:  John H Werren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Fitness consequences of a non-recombining sex-ratio drive chromosome can explain its prevalence in the wild.

Authors:  Kelly A Dyer; David W Hall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  SUPPRESSION OF SEX-RATIO MEIOTIC DRIVE AND THE MAINTENANCE OF Y-CHROMOSOME POLYMORPHISM IN DROSOPHILA.

Authors:  John Jaenike
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 7.  Dissecting the genetics of longevity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Annalise B Paaby; Paul S Schmidt
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 2.160

8.  The fertility effects of pericentric inversions in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Coyne; W Meyers; A P Crittenden; P Sniegowski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genome-wide analysis in Drosophila reveals age-specific effects of SNPs on fitness traits.

Authors:  Mary F Durham; Michael M Magwire; Eric A Stone; Jeff Leips
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  No evidence for female discrimination against male house mice carrying a selfish genetic element.

Authors:  Andreas Sutter; Anna K Lindholm
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 2.624

View more
  9 in total

1.  X-linked meiotic drive can boost population size and persistence.

Authors:  Carl Mackintosh; Andrew Pomiankowski; Michael F Scott
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Selfish genetic elements and male fertility.

Authors:  Rudi L Verspoor; Tom A R Price; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Gene drive: progress and prospects.

Authors:  N Wedell; T A R Price; A K Lindholm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Fitness consequences of a non-recombining sex-ratio drive chromosome can explain its prevalence in the wild.

Authors:  Kelly A Dyer; David W Hall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Diverse mating phenotypes impact the spread of wtf meiotic drivers in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  José Fabricio López Hernández; Rachel M Helston; Jeffrey J Lange; R Blake Billmyre; Samantha H Schaffner; Michael T Eickbush; Scott McCroskey; Sarah E Zanders
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 6.  Resistance to natural and synthetic gene drive systems.

Authors:  Tom A R Price; Nikolai Windbichler; Robert L Unckless; Andreas Sutter; Jan-Niklas Runge; Perran A Ross; Andrew Pomiankowski; Nicole L Nuckolls; Catherine Montchamp-Moreau; Nicole Mideo; Oliver Y Martin; Andri Manser; Mathieu Legros; Amanda M Larracuente; Luke Holman; John Godwin; Neil Gemmell; Cécile Courret; Anna Buchman; Luke G Barrett; Anna K Lindholm
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Linked supergenes underlie split sex ratio and social organization in an ant.

Authors:  German Lagunas-Robles; Jessica Purcell; Alan Brelsford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Inter- and intraspecific variation in mycotoxin tolerance: A study of four Drosophila species.

Authors:  Prajakta P Kokate; Morgan Smith; Lucinda Hall; Kui Zhang; Thomas Werner
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 3.167

9.  Polyandry blocks gene drive in a wild house mouse population.

Authors:  Andri Manser; Barbara König; Anna K Lindholm
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.