Literature DB >> 12803906

Site-specific selfish genes as tools for the control and genetic engineering of natural populations.

Austin Burt1.   

Abstract

Site-specific selfish genes exploit host functions to copy themselves into a defined target DNA sequence, and include homing endonuclease genes, group II introns and some LINE-like transposable elements. If such genes can be engineered to target new host sequences, then they can be used to manipulate natural populations, even if the number of individuals released is a small fraction of the entire population. For example, a genetic load sufficient to eradicate a population can be imposed in fewer than 20 generations, if the target is an essential host gene, the knockout is recessive and the selfish gene has an appropriate promoter. There will be selection for resistance, but several strategies are available for reducing the likelihood of it evolving. These genes may also be used to genetically engineer natural populations, by means of population-wide gene knockouts, gene replacements and genetic transformations. By targeting sex-linked loci just prior to meiosis one may skew the population sex ratio, and by changing the promoter one may limit the spread of the gene to neighbouring populations. The proposed constructs are evolutionarily stable in the face of the mutations most likely to arise during their spread, and strategies are also available for reversing the manipulations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12803906      PMCID: PMC1691325          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  32 in total

1.  The use of mRNA display to select high-affinity protein-binding peptides.

Authors:  D S Wilson; A D Keefe; J W Szostak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Averting a malaria disaster.

Authors:  N J White; F Nosten; S Looareesuwan; W M Watkins; K Marsh; R W Snow; G Kokwaro; J Ouma; T T Hien; M E Molyneux; T E Taylor; C I Newbold; T K Ruebush; M Danis; B M Greenwood; R M Anderson; P Olliaro
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-06-05       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Insect population control using a dominant, repressible, lethal genetic system.

Authors:  D D Thomas; C A Donnelly; R J Wood; L S Alphey
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Directed evolution of the site specificity of Cre recombinase.

Authors:  Stephen W Santoro; Peter G Schultz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mutations altering the cleavage specificity of a homing endonuclease.

Authors:  Lenny M Seligman; Karen M Chisholm; Brett S Chevalier; Meggen S Chadsey; Samuel T Edwards; Jeremiah H Savage; Adeline L Veillet
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Outcrossed sex allows a selfish gene to invade yeast populations.

Authors:  M R Goddard; D Greig; A Burt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Sex chromosomes, recombination, and chromatin conformation.

Authors:  B D McKee; M A Handel
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 8.  Humans as the world's greatest evolutionary force.

Authors:  S R Palumbi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-07       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Transgenic anopheline mosquitoes impaired in transmission of a malaria parasite.

Authors:  Junitsu Ito; Anil Ghosh; Luciano A Moreira; Ernst A Wimmer; Marcelo Jacobs-Lorena
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-05-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  An intron-encoded protein is active in a gene conversion process that spreads an intron into a mitochondrial gene.

Authors:  A Jacquier; B Dujon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  212 in total

1.  Use of Wolbachia to drive nuclear transgenes through insect populations.

Authors:  Steven P Sinkins; H Charles J Godfray
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Modeling the Manipulation of Natural Populations by the Mutagenic Chain Reaction.

Authors:  Robert L Unckless; Philipp W Messer; Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Opinion: Is CRISPR-based gene drive a biocontrol silver bullet or global conservation threat?

Authors:  Bruce L Webber; S Raghu; Owain R Edwards
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Caution urged over editing DNA in wildlife (intentionally or not).

Authors:  Heidi Ledford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Cheating evolution: engineering gene drives to manipulate the fate of wild populations.

Authors:  Jackson Champer; Anna Buchman; Omar S Akbari
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Can CRISPR-Cas9 gene drives curb malaria?

Authors:  Luke Alphey
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Genetically engineered underdominance for manipulation of pest populations: a deterministic model.

Authors:  Krisztian Magori; Fred Gould
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Malaria, mosquitoes and the legacy of Ronald Ross.

Authors:  Robert E Sinden
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 9.408

9.  The population genetics of using homing endonuclease genes in vector and pest management.

Authors:  Anne Deredec; Austin Burt; H C J Godfray
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Genetic control of Aedes mosquitoes.

Authors:  Luke Alphey; Andrew McKemey; Derric Nimmo; Marco Neira Oviedo; Renaud Lacroix; Kelly Matzen; Camilla Beech
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.