Literature DB >> 8325485

The fertility effects of pericentric inversions in Drosophila melanogaster.

J A Coyne1, W Meyers, A P Crittenden, P Sniegowski.   

Abstract

Heterozygotes for pericentric inversions are expected to be semisterile because recombination in the inverted region produces aneuploid gametes. Newly arising pericentric inversions should therefore be quickly eliminated from populations by natural selection. The occasional polymorphism for such inversions and their fixation among closely related species have supported the idea that genetic drift in very small populations can overcome natural selection in the wild. We studied the effect of 7 second-chromosome and 30 third-chromosome pericentric inversions on the fertility of heterokaryotypic Drosophila melanogaster females. Surprisingly, fertility was not significantly reduced in many cases, even when the inversion was quite large. This lack of underdominance is almost certainly due to suppressed recombination in inversion heterozygotes, a phenomenon previously observed in Drosophila. In the large sample of third-chromosome inversions, the degree of underdominance depends far more on the position of breakpoints than on the inversion's length. Analysis of these positions shows that this chromosome has a pair of "sensitive sites" near cytological divisions 68 and 92: these sites appear to reduce recombination in a heterozygous inversion whose breakpoints are nearby. There may also be "sensitive sites" near divisions 31 and 49 on the second chromosome. Such sites may be important in initiating synapsis. Because many pericentric inversions do not reduce the fertility of heterozygotes, we conclude that the observed fixation or polymorphism of such rearrangements in nature does not imply genetic drift in very small populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8325485      PMCID: PMC1205492     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  18 in total

1.  Relationships within the melanogaster species subgroup of the genus Drosophila (Sophophora). II. Phylogenetic relationships between six species based upon polytene chromosome banding sequences.

Authors:  F Lemeunier; M A Ashburner
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1976-05-18

2.  Genetic and chromosomal variability in Drosophila.

Authors:  W S STONE
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1955

3.  A dual level model for speciation by multiple pericentric inversions.

Authors:  M King
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Lack of underdominance in a naturally occurring pericentric inversion in Drosophila melanogaster and its implications for chromosome evolution.

Authors:  J A Coyne; S Aulard; A Berry
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Synaptic adjustment of inversion loops in Neurospora crassa.

Authors:  M Bojko
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Models of speciation. New concepts suggest that the classical sympatric and allopatric models are not the only alternatives.

Authors:  M J White
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-03-08       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Screening for x-ray-induced crossover suppressors in Drosophila melanogaster: prevalence and effectiveness of translocations.

Authors:  P A Roberts
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Fungal recombination.

Authors:  T L Orr-Weaver; J W Szostak
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1985-03

9.  Chromosomal sites necessary for normal levels of meiotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Evidence for and mapping of the sites.

Authors:  R S Hawley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Evidence for heterosynaptic pairing of the inverted segment in pericentric inversion heterozygotes of the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus).

Authors:  I F Greenbaum; M J Reed
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1984
View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Hybridization, introgression, and linkage evolution.

Authors:  L H Rieseberg; S J Baird; K A Gardner
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species.

Authors:  M A Noor; K L Grams; L A Bertucci; J Reiland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Coalescent patterns for chromosomal inversions in divergent populations.

Authors:  Rafael F Guerrero; François Rousset; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Molecular analysis of recombination in a family with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and a large pericentric X chromosome inversion.

Authors:  V Shashi; W L Golden; P S Allinson; S H Blanton; C von Kap-Herr; T E Kelly
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Chromosomal evolution and speciation: a recombination-based approach.

Authors:  Kevin Livingstone; Loren Rieseberg
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Nick Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Recombination and gene flux caused by gene conversion and crossing over in inversion heterokaryotypes.

Authors:  A Navarro; E Betrán; A Barbadilla; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The extent, mechanism, and consequences of genetic variation, for recombination rate.

Authors:  W P Robinson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 9.  Sex chromosome drive.

Authors:  Quentin Helleu; Pierre R Gérard; Catherine Montchamp-Moreau
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 10.005

10.  Experimental evidence for interspecific directional selection on moth pheromone communication.

Authors:  Astrid T Groot; Joy L Horovitz; Jennifer Hamilton; Richard G Santangelo; Coby Schal; Fred Gould
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.