Literature DB >> 31844361

Rising Cesarean Rates: Are Primary Sections Overused?

Kalpana Mahadik1.   

Abstract

Doubling of C-section rates from year 2000 to 2015 globally was declared an eye-opener on October 13, 2018, in FIGO World Congress. Rapid increase in rates without clear evidence of concomitant decrease in maternal or neonatal morbidity or mortality raises significant concern that cesarean delivery is overused. This review addresses issues related to exponentially rising rates, reasons for it, and strategies to reduce. Previous cesarean delivery has main contribution to rising rates as per evidence from the literature search in last 5 years. Focus on optimizing indications of primary C-section resulted in making us rethink modifiable indications like labor dystocia, indeterminate fetal heart rate tracing, suspected fetal macrosomia, malposition, risk-adapted obstetrics, litigation fears, on demand cesarean in literate women and overuse of labor induction. Use of uniform classification system (Robson/WHO classification) with recommendations of WHO, FIGO and annual audits with cloud-based anonymous registry will streamline decisions for cesarean in nullipara and help to control the situation. © Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Labor dystocia; Modifiable indications of cesarean; Primary cesarean; Rising cesarean rates; Robson classification

Year:  2019        PMID: 31844361      PMCID: PMC6889110          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-019-01246-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  23 in total

Review 1.  Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits?

Authors:  Kimberly D Gregory; Sherri Jackson; Lisa Korst; Moshe Fridman
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term.

Authors:  Shiliang Liu; Robert M Liston; K S Joseph; Maureen Heaman; Reg Sauve; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Electronic fetal monitoring, cerebral palsy, and caesarean section: assumptions versus evidence.

Authors:  Karin B Nelson; Thomas P Sartwelle; Dwight J Rouse
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-12-01

4.  Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study.

Authors:  Mohammed Walid Zimmo; Katariina Laine; Sahar Hassan; Bettina Bottcher; Erik Fosse; Hadil Ali-Masri; Kaled Zimmo; Ragnhild Sørum Falk; Marit Lieng; Åse Vikanes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.

Authors:  Ties Boerma; Carine Ronsmans; Dessalegn Y Melesse; Aluisio J D Barros; Fernando C Barros; Liang Juan; Ann-Beth Moller; Lale Say; Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor; Mu Yi; Dácio de Lyra Rabello Neto; Marleen Temmerman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys.

Authors:  Joshua P Vogel; Ana Pilar Betrán; Nadia Vindevoghel; João Paulo Souza; Maria Regina Torloni; Jun Zhang; Özge Tunçalp; Rintaro Mori; Naho Morisaki; Eduardo Ortiz-Panozo; Bernardo Hernandez; Ricardo Pérez-Cuevas; Zahida Qureshi; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Marleen Temmerman
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 26.763

Review 7.  Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maria Regina Torloni; Ana Pilar Betran; Joao Paulo Souza; Mariana Widmer; Tomas Allen; Metin Gulmezoglu; Mario Merialdi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth.

Authors:  Marcos Nakamura-Pereira; Maria do Carmo Leal; Ana Paula Esteves-Pereira; Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues; Jacqueline Alves Torres; Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias; Maria Elisabeth Moreira
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.223

9.  Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop.

Authors:  Catherine Y Spong; Vincenzo Berghella; Katharine D Wenstrom; Brian M Mercer; George R Saade
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn't work and how to improve it.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betrán; Nadia Vindevoghel; Joao Paulo Souza; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Maria Regina Torloni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.