Literature DB >> 30361403

Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study.

Mohammed Walid Zimmo1,2,3, Katariina Laine4,5, Sahar Hassan6, Bettina Bottcher7, Erik Fosse2,3, Hadil Ali-Masri2,3,8, Kaled Zimmo2,3,9, Ragnhild Sørum Falk10, Marit Lieng2,11, Åse Vikanes3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the current situation of caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS).
DESIGN: A population-based birth cohort study.
SETTING: Obstetrical departments in three governmental hospitals in Gaza. PARTICIPANTS: All women (18 908) who gave birth between 1 January 2016 and 30 April 2017.
METHODS: The contributions of each group to the study population and to the overall rate of caesarean section were calculated, as well as the rate of caesarean section in each TGCS group. Differences in proportions between study hospitals were assessed by χ2 test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was the contributions of each group to the overall caesarean section rate.
RESULTS: The overall rate of caesarean section was 22.9% (4337 of 18 908), ranging from 20.6% in hospital 1 to 24.6% in hospital 3. The largest contributors to the overall caesarean section rate were multiparous women with single cephalic full-term pregnancy who had undergone at least one caesarean section (group 5, 42.6%), women with multiple pregnancies (group 8, 11.6%) and those with single cephalic preterm labour (group 10, 8.1%). Statistically significant differences in caesarean section rates between the study hospitals were observed in group 1 (nulliparous women with single cephalic full-term pregnancy and spontaneous labour), group 4 (multiparous with single cephalic full-term pregnancy with induced labour or prelabour caesarean section), group 5 (multiparous with single cephalic full-term pregnancy with previous caesarean section) and in group 7 (multiparous with breech presentation).
CONCLUSION: Women in groups 5, 8 and 10 were the largest contributors to the overall caesarean section rate in the study hospitals. Efforts to reduce the differences in obstetrical care between hospitals need to be directed towards increasing the proportion of vaginal births after caesarean section and by reducing primary caesarean section in multiple pregnancies and preterm labour. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caesarean section; gaza; maternal medicine; palestine; prenatal diagnosis; robson ten group classification system

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30361403      PMCID: PMC6224732          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  25 in total

1.  Cesarean delivery in the United States 2005 through 2014: a population-based analysis using the Robson 10-Group Classification System.

Authors:  Mark P Hehir; Cande V Ananth; Zainab Siddiq; Karen Flood; Alexander M Friedman; Mary E D'Alton
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Reporting Caesarean Delivery in Quebec Using the Robson Classification System.

Authors:  Stéphanie Roberge; Eric Dubé; Simon Blouin; Nils Chaillet
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2017-03

3.  Appropriate technology for birth.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-08-24       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  [Robson classification: A tool for assessment of caesarean practices in France].

Authors:  C Le Ray; C Prunet; C Deneux-Tharaux; F Goffinet; B Blondel
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  2015-04-07

5.  Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor.

Authors:  Donal J Brennan; Michael S Robson; Martina Murphy; Colm O'Herlihy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth.

Authors:  Marcos Nakamura-Pereira; Maria do Carmo Leal; Ana Paula Esteves-Pereira; Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues; Jacqueline Alves Torres; Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias; Maria Elisabeth Moreira
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Building a research registry for studying birth complications and outcomes in six Palestinian governmental hospitals.

Authors:  Sahar Hassan; Ase Vikanes; Katariina Laine; Khaled Zimmo; Mohammad Zimmo; Espen Bjertness; Erik Fosse
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  National Variation in Caesarean Section Rates: A Cross Sectional Study in Ireland.

Authors:  Sarah-Jo Sinnott; Aoife Brick; Richard Layte; Nathan Cunningham; Michael J Turner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betrán; Jianfeng Ye; Anne-Beth Moller; Jun Zhang; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Maria Regina Torloni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Implementation of the Robson classification in clinical practice:Lithuania's experience.

Authors:  Justina Kacerauskiene; Egle Bartuseviciene; Dalia Regina Railaite; Meile Minkauskiene; Arnoldas Bartusevicius; Mindaugas Kliucinskas; Renata Simoliuniene; Ruta J Nadisauskiene
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Rising Cesarean Rates: Are Primary Sections Overused?

Authors:  Kalpana Mahadik
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2019-06-13

2.  Prevalence of underweight, overweight and obesity among Palestinian school-age children and the associated risk factors: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Saad Al-Lahham; Nidal Jaradat; Mohammad Altamimi; Ola Anabtawi; Alma Irshid; Malik AlQub; Majdi Dwikat; Fouad Nafaa; Lama Badran; Rawan Mohareb; Reema Haji; Tareq Aqqad; Sadeq Jayyab; Budour Abu Ghosh; Rina Taher; Hamzeh Al Zabadi
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.125

3.  Caesarean sections in teaching hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis of hospitals in 22 countries.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Esra Zhubi; Krenare Grezda; Blerta Kryeziu; Jeta Bunjaku; Fitim Sadiku; Riaz Agahi; Daniel Adrian Lungu; Manila Bonciani; George Little
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  The Rates of Cesarean Section Deliveries According to Robson Classification System During the Year of 2018 Among Patients in King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Shaymaa M Alsulami; Mohammed T Ashmawi; Rafeef O Jarwan; Israa A Malli; Suheal K Albar; Hatim M Al-Jifree
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-11-17

5.  Trends, wealth inequalities and the role of the private sector in caesarean section in the Middle East and North Africa: A repeat cross-sectional analysis of population-based surveys.

Authors:  Stephen J McCall; Aline Semaan; Noon Altijani; Charles Opondo; Mohamed Abdel-Fattah; Tamar Kabakian-Khasholian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Using the Robson classification to assess caesarean section rates in Brazil: an observational study of more than 24 million births from 2011 to 2017.

Authors:  Enny S Paixao; Christian Bottomley; Liam Smeeth; Maria Conceicao N da Costa; Maria Gloria Teixeira; Maria Yury Ichihara; Ligia Gabrielli; Mauricio L Barreto; Oona M R Campbell
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Utilizing the Robson 10-Group Classification System as an Audit Tool in Assessing the Soaring Caesarean Section Rates in Ibadan, Nigeria.

Authors:  Oluwasomidoyin Olukemi Bello; Adebayo Damilola Agboola
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2022-08-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.