Literature DB >> 23090537

Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop.

Catherine Y Spong, Vincenzo Berghella, Katharine D Wenstrom, Brian M Mercer, George R Saade.   

Abstract

With more than one third of pregnancies in the United States being delivered by cesarean and the growing knowledge of morbidities associated with repeat cesarean deliveries, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists convened a workshop to address the concept of preventing the first cesarean delivery. The available information on maternal and fetal factors, labor management and induction, and nonmedical factors leading to the first cesarean delivery was reviewed as well as the implications of the first cesarean delivery on future reproductive health. Key points were identified to assist with reduction in cesarean delivery rates including that labor induction should be performed primarily for medical indication; if done for nonmedical indications, the gestational age should be at least 39 weeks or more and the cervix should be favorable, especially in the nulliparous patient. Review of the current literature demonstrates the importance of adhering to appropriate definitions for failed induction and arrest of labor progress. The diagnosis of "failed induction" should only be made after an adequate attempt. Adequate time for normal latent and active phases of the first stage, and for the second stage, should be allowed as long as the maternal and fetal conditions permit. The adequate time for each of these stages appears to be longer than traditionally estimated. Operative vaginal delivery is an acceptable birth method when indicated and can safely prevent cesarean delivery. Given the progressively declining use, it is critical that training and experience in operative vaginal delivery are facilitated and encouraged. When discussing the first cesarean delivery with a patient, counseling should include its effect on future reproductive health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23090537      PMCID: PMC3548444          DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182704880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  34 in total

1.  Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?

Authors:  M S Robson
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.237

2.  Physician incentives and the timing of cesarean sections: evidence from California.

Authors:  J Spetz; M W Smith; S F Ennis
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Long-term effects of vacuum and forceps deliveries.

Authors:  D S Seidman; A Laor; R Gale; D K Stevenson; S Mashiach; Y L Danon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Helain J Landy; D Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Shoshana Haberman; Kimberly D Gregory; Christos G Hatjis; Mildred M Ramirez; Jennifer L Bailit; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Judith U Hibbard; Matthew K Hoffman; Michelle Kominiarek; Lee A Learman; Paul Van Veldhuisen; James Troendle; Uma M Reddy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  The effect of forceps delivery on cognitive development.

Authors:  B D Wesley; B J van den Berg; E A Reece
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  The singleton, cephalic, nulliparous woman after 36 weeks of gestation: contribution to overall cesarean delivery rates.

Authors:  Donal J Brennan; Martina Murphy; Michael S Robson; Colm O'Herlihy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Dwight J Rouse; Steven J Weiner; Steven L Bloom; Michael W Varner; Catherine Y Spong; Susan M Ramin; Steve N Caritis; Alan M Peaceman; Yoram Sorokin; Anthony Sciscione; Marshall W Carpenter; Brian M Mercer; John M Thorp; Fergal D Malone; Margaret Harper; Jay D Iams; Garland D Anderson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Man Wah Pang; Tse Ngong Leung; Tze Kin Lau; Tony Kwok Hang Chung
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.689

9.  Outcomes of care in birth centers. The National Birth Center Study.

Authors:  J P Rooks; N L Weatherby; E K Ernst; S Stapleton; D Rosen; A Rosenfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-12-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maria Regina Torloni; Ana Pilar Betran; Joao Paulo Souza; Mariana Widmer; Tomas Allen; Metin Gulmezoglu; Mario Merialdi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  111 in total

1.  Using the Probability of Cesarean from a Validated Cesarean Prediction Calculator to Predict Labor Length and Morbidity.

Authors:  Rebecca F Hamm; Katheryne L Downes; Sindhu K Srinivas; Lisa D Levine
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  On the variation in maternal birth canal in vivo viscoelastic properties and their effect on the predicted length of active second stage and levator ani tears.

Authors:  Paige V Tracy; Shreya Wadhwani; Jourdan Triebwasser; Alan S Wineman; Francisco J Orejuela; Susan M Ramin; John O DeLancey; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Applying a physiologic partograph to Consortium on Safe Labor data to identify opportunities for safely decreasing cesarean births among nulliparous women.

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Nancy K Lowe; Aaron B Caughey; Kelly A Bennett; Ellen L Tilden; Nicole S Carlson; Julia C Phillippi; Mary S Dietrich
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.689

4.  Metabolic Pathways Associated With Term Labor Induction Course in African American Women.

Authors:  Nicole S Carlson; Jennifer K Frediani; Elizabeth J Corwin; Anne Dunlop; Dean Jones
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 2.522

Review 5.  Vacuum extraction vaginal delivery: current trend and safety.

Authors:  Jihan Jeon; Sunghun Na
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2017-10-23

Review 6.  Prevention of the first cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Catherine Y Spong
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  The influence of detailed maternal ethnicity on cesarean delivery: findings from the U.S. birth certificate in the State of Massachusetts.

Authors:  Joyce K Edmonds; Summer S Hawkins; Bruce B Cohen
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.689

8.  The impact of variations in obstetric practice on maternal birth trauma.

Authors:  Ixora Kamisan Atan; Shek Ka Lai; Suzanne Langer; Jessica Caudwell-Hall; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Reframing US Maternity Care: Lessons Learned From End-of-Life Care.

Authors:  Ellen L Tilden; Jonathan M Snowden; Aaron B Caughey; Nancy K Lowe
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.388

10.  Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals; reducing variation may address quality and cost issues.

Authors:  Katy Backes Kozhimannil; Michael R Law; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.301

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.