Literature DB >> 30322584

Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.

Ties Boerma1, Carine Ronsmans2, Dessalegn Y Melesse3, Aluisio J D Barros4, Fernando C Barros5, Liang Juan6, Ann-Beth Moller7, Lale Say7, Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor8, Mu Yi6, Dácio de Lyra Rabello Neto9, Marleen Temmerman10.   

Abstract

In this Series paper, we describe the frequency of, trends in, determinants of, and inequalities in caesarean section (CS) use, globally, regionally, and in selected countries. On the basis of data from 169 countries that include 98·4% of the world's births, we estimate that 29·7 million (21·1%, 95% uncertainty interval 19·9-22·4) births occurred through CS in 2015, which was almost double the number of births by this method in 2000 (16·0 million [12·1%, 10·9-13·3] births). CS use in 2015 was up to ten times more frequent in the Latin America and Caribbean region, where it was used in 44·3% (41·3-47·4) of births, than in the west and central Africa region, where it was used in 4·1% (3·6-4·6) of births. The global and regional increases in CS use were driven both by an increasing proportion of births occurring in health facilities (accounting for 66·5% of the global increase) and increases in CS use within health facilities (33·5%), with considerable variation between regions. Based on the most recent data available for each country, 15% of births in 106 (63%) of 169 countries were by CS, whereas 47 (28%) countries showed CS use in less than 10% of births. National CS use varied from 0·6% in South Sudan to 58·1% in the Dominican Republic. Within-country disparities in CS use were also very large: CS use was almost five times more frequent in births in the richest versus the poorest quintiles in low-income and middle-income countries; markedly high CS use was observed among low obstetric risk births, especially among more educated women in, for example, Brazil and China; and CS use was 1·6 times more frequent in private facilities than in public facilities.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30322584     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  228 in total

Review 1.  Rising Cesarean Rates: Are Primary Sections Overused?

Authors:  Kalpana Mahadik
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2019-06-13

2.  Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Following Trial of Labor After Two Previous Cesareans: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ayala Hirsch; Reut Rotem; Hen Y Sela; Arnon Samueloff; Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky; Misgav Rottenstreich
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 3.  The Use of Copper as an Antimicrobial Agent in Health Care, Including Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Authors:  Linda P Arendsen; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Bacterial Baptism: Scientific, Medical, and Regulatory Issues Raised by Vaginal Seeding of C-Section-Born Babies.

Authors:  Noel T Mueller; Suchitra K Hourigan; Diane E Hoffmann; Lauren Levy; Erik C von Rosenvinge; Betty Chou; Maria-Gloria Dominguez-Bello
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 5.  Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Pregnancy and Outcomes Among Pregnant Women and Neonates: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Elyse G Mark; Samuel McAleese; W Christopher Golden; Maureen M Gilmore; Anna Sick-Samuels; Melanie S Curless; Lawrence M Nogee; Aaron M Milstone; Julia Johnson
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section.

Authors:  Myfanwy J Williams; Carolina Carvalho Ribeiro do Valle; Gillian Ml Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-04

7.  Interventions for preventing nausea and vomiting in women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  James D Griffiths; Gillian Ml Gyte; Phil A Popham; Kacey Williams; Shantini Paranjothy; Hannah K Broughton; Heather C Brown; Jane Thomas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-18

Review 8.  Cesarean delivery in low- and middle-income countries: A review of quality of care metrics and targets for improvement.

Authors:  Adeline A Boatin; Joseph Ngonzi; Gabriel Ganyaglo; Magatte Mbaye; Blair J Wylie; Khady Diouf
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Inequalities in access to birth by caesarean section in the context of user fee exemption for maternal health services in southwest and north central Nigeria.

Authors:  Anthony Idowu Ajayi
Journal:  Int Health       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.473

10.  Association of Gestational Age at Birth With Brain Morphometry.

Authors:  Hanan El Marroun; Runyu Zou; Michelle F Leeuwenburg; Eric A P Steegers; Irwin K M Reiss; Ryan L Muetzel; Steven A Kushner; Henning Tiemeier
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 16.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.