Literature DB >> 25866355

Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys.

Joshua P Vogel1, Ana Pilar Betrán2, Nadia Vindevoghel3, João Paulo Souza4, Maria Regina Torloni5, Jun Zhang6, Özge Tunçalp2, Rintaro Mori7, Naho Morisaki8, Eduardo Ortiz-Panozo9, Bernardo Hernandez10, Ricardo Pérez-Cuevas11, Zahida Qureshi12, A Metin Gülmezoglu2, Marleen Temmerman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rates of caesarean section surgery are rising worldwide, but the determinants of this increase, especially in low-income and middle-income countries, are controversial. In this study, we aimed to analyse the contribution of specific obstetric populations to changes in caesarean section rates, by using the Robson classification in two WHO multicountry surveys of deliveries in health-care facilities. The Robson system classifies all deliveries into one of ten groups on the basis of five parameters: obstetric history, onset of labour, fetal lie, number of neonates, and gestational age.
METHODS: We studied deliveries in 287 facilities in 21 countries that were included in both the WHO Global Survey of Maternal and Perinatal Health (WHOGS; 2004-08) and the WHO Multi-Country Survey of Maternal and Newborn Health (WHOMCS; 2010-11). We used the data from these surveys to establish the average annual percentage change (AAPC) in caesarean section rates per country. Countries were stratified according to Human Development Index (HDI) group (very high/high, medium, or low) and the Robson criteria were applied to both datasets. We report the relative size of each Robson group, the caesarean section rate in each Robson group, and the absolute and relative contributions made by each to the overall caesarean section rate.
FINDINGS: The caesarean section rate increased overall between the two surveys (from 26.4% in the WHOGS to 31.2% in the WHOMCS, p=0.003) and in all countries except Japan. Use of obstetric interventions (induction, prelabour caesarean section, and overall caesarean section) increased over time. Caesarean section rates increased across most Robson groups in all HDI categories. Use of induction and prelabour caesarean section increased in very high/high and low HDI countries, and the caesarean section rate after induction in multiparous women increased significantly across all HDI groups. The proportion of women who had previously had a caesarean section increased in moderate and low HDI countries, as did the caesarean section rate in these women.
INTERPRETATION: Use of the Robson criteria allows standardised comparisons of data across countries and timepoints and identifies the subpopulations driving changes in caesarean section rates. Women who have previously had a caesarean section are an increasingly important determinant of overall caesarean section rates in countries with a moderate or low HDI. Strategies to reduce the frequency of the procedure should include avoidance of medically unnecessary primary caesarean section. Improved case selection for induction and prelabour caesarean section could also reduce caesarean section rates. FUNDING: None. ©2015 World Health Organization; licensee Elsevier. This is an Open Access article published without any waiver of WHO's privileges and immunities under international law, convention, or agreement. This article should not be reproduced for use in association with the promotion of commercial products, services or any legal entity. There should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organisation or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25866355     DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70094-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Glob Health        ISSN: 2214-109X            Impact factor:   26.763


  153 in total

1.  Secular changes in body height predict global rates of caesarean section.

Authors:  Eva Zaffarini; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Making cesarean delivery SAFE in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison; Robert L Goldenberg
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  A prospective pilot study of Dilapan-S compared with Propess for induction of labour at 41+ weeks in nulliparous pregnancy.

Authors:  David A Crosby; Claire O'Reilly; Helen McHale; Fionnuala M McAuliffe; Rhona Mahony
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Assessing the Accuracy of Reporting of Maternal Red Blood Cell Transfusion at Birth Reported in Routinely Collected Hospital Data.

Authors:  Jillian A Patterson; Sally Francis; Jane B Ford
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-09

Review 5.  Rising Cesarean Rates: Are Primary Sections Overused?

Authors:  Kalpana Mahadik
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2019-06-13

6.  Caesarean section and risk of autism across gestational age: a multi-national cohort study of 5 million births.

Authors:  Benjamin Hon Kei Yip; Helen Leonard; Sarah Stock; Camilla Stoltenberg; Richard W Francis; Mika Gissler; Raz Gross; Diana Schendel; Sven Sandin
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  A prospective study of maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes in the setting of cesarean section in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison; Omrana Pasha; Sarah Saleem; Sumera Ali; Elwyn Chomba; Waldemar A Carlo; Ana L Garces; Nancy F Krebs; K Michael Hambidge; Shivaprasad S Goudar; Bhala Kodkany; Sangappa Dhaded; Richard J Derman; Archana Patel; Patricia L Hibberd; Fabian Esamai; Edward A Liechty; Janet L Moore; Dennis Wallace; Elizabeth M Mcclure; Menachem Miodovnik; Marion Koso-Thomas; Jose Belizan; Antoinette K Tshefu; Melissa Bauserman; Robert L Goldenberg
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Trends in the Mode of Delivery of Pregnant Women in Rural Guatemala from a Quality Improvement Database.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison; Sharon Scarbro; Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga; Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano; Saskia Bunge-Montes; Guillermo A Bolaños; Molly Lamb; Edwin J Asturias; Stephen Berman; Gretchen Heinrichs
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-04

9.  Does maternal obesity explain trends in caesarean section rates? Evidence from a large Irish maternity hospital.

Authors:  Aoife Brick; Richard Layte; Aoife McKeating; Sharon R Sheehan; Michael J Turner
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Proposing a Hybrid Model Based on Robson's Classification for Better Impact on Trends of Cesarean Deliveries.

Authors:  Punit Hans; Renu Rohatgi
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.