Literature DB >> 3183209

Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses.

W V Summers1, D B Pisoni, R H Bernacki, R I Pedlow, M A Stokes.   

Abstract

Acoustical analyses were carried out on a set of utterances produced by two male speakers talking in quiet and in 80, 90, and 100 dB SPL of masking noise. In addition to replicating previous studies demonstrating increases in amplitude, duration, and vocal pitch while talking in noise, these analyses also found reliable differences in the formant frequencies and short-term spectra of vowels. Perceptual experiments were also conducted to assess the intelligibility of utterances produced in quiet and in noise when they were presented at equal S/N ratios for identification. In each experiment, utterances originally produced in noise were found to be more intelligible than utterances produced in the quiet. The results of the acoustic analyses showed clear and consistent differences in the acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced in quiet versus noisy environments. Moreover, these accounts differences produced reliable effects on intelligibility. The findings are discussed in terms of: (1) the nature of the acoustic changes that taken place when speakers produce speech under adverse conditions such as noise, psychological stress, or high cognitive load: (2) the role of training and feedback in controlling and modifying a talker's speech to improve performance of current speech recognizers; and (3) the development of robust algorithms for recognition of speech in noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3183209      PMCID: PMC3507387          DOI: 10.1121/1.396660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Effect of level of distracting noise upon speaking rate, duration and intensity.

Authors:  T D HANLEY; M D STEER
Journal:  J Speech Disord       Date:  1949-12

2.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech.

Authors:  M A Picheny; N I Durlach; L D Braida
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1986-12

3.  Regulation of voice communication by sensory dynamics.

Authors:  H Lane; B Tranel; C Sisson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech.

Authors:  M A Picheny; N I Durlach; L D Braida
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-03

5.  Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts.

Authors:  W E Cooper; S J Eady; P R Mueller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 1.840

  5 in total
  57 in total

1.  Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: talker-, listener-, and item-related factors.

Authors:  A R Bradlow; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Focal manipulations of formant trajectories reveal a role of auditory feedback in the online control of both within-syllable and between-syllable speech timing.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Calling louder and longer: how bats use biosonar under severe acoustic interference from other bats.

Authors:  Eran Amichai; Gaddi Blumrosen; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Children's perception of speech produced in a two-talker background.

Authors:  Mallory Baker; Emily Buss; Adam Jacks; Crystal Taylor; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Effects of increasing sound pressure level on lip and jaw movement parameters and consistency in young adults.

Authors:  Jessica E Huber; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Evaluating the role of spectral and envelope characteristics in the intelligibility advantage of clear speech.

Authors:  Jean C Krause; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  An investigation of articulatory setting using real-time magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Vikram Ramanarayanan; Louis Goldstein; Dani Byrd; Shrikanth S Narayanan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Evidence that the Lombard effect is frequency-specific in humans.

Authors:  Lauren M Stowe; Edward J Golob
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A new method for eliciting three speaking styles in the laboratory.

Authors:  James D Harnsberger; Richard Wright; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 2.017

10.  Perceptual adaptation and intelligibility of multiple talkers for two types of degraded speech.

Authors:  Tessa Bent; Adam Buchwald; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.